ELS-The Rule of Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who is A.V. Dicey?

A

19th-century legal thinker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Dicey believe was unique about England’s rule of law?

A

It was distinguished from other European countries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dicey’s 3 key principles about the rule of law.

A
  1. State does not have arbitrary (autocratic) power.
  2. Equality before the law.
  3. Law must be supreme.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does the state not have arbitrary power, as according to Dicey’s principles on the rule of law?

A

Law sets limits on what the state can do, so the government dos not have complete discretionary (optional) powers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evidence the state does not have arbitrary power.

A

Courts stopped May exiting the EU without a vote in Parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is there equality before the law, as according to Dicey’s principles on the rule of law?

A

No one-royals or members of the government-are above the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is the law supreme, as according to Dicey’s principles on the rule of law?

A

In Dicey’s time, most laws came through common law rather than Parliament, though now more laws come from statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who agreed with Dicey that the rule of law limited arbitrary power?

A

F.A. von Hayek

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did F.A. von Hayek claim was happening to the rule of law and why?

A

Argued rule of law was weakening as Parliament passed ever greater amounts of legislation and played an increasing role in everyday life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 problems with Dicey’s viewpoint on the rule of law.

A
  1. Contradicts his own ideas about Parliamentary sovereignty-does Parliament have complete discretionary powers or are these limited by the law?
  2. In practice, equality before the law can depend on factors such as wealth, power, connections etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Joseph Raz argue the rule of law was a means of doing?

A

Controlling parliamentary discretion rather than preventing it completely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Joseph Raz’s 4 key elements of the rule of law.

A
  1. Should be clear rules and procedures for making laws.
  2. Independence of the judiciary must be guaranteed.
  3. Must be natural justice-that is, fair trials.
  4. Courts have the right to review the way in which other principles are implemented to ensure it is within the rule of law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does s.1 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 recognise?

A

“the existing constitutional principle of the rule of law”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does s.1(3) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 state?

A

The government must maintain independence of the judiciary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rule of law in practice in law-making.

A
  1. New statutes need to go through both the Commons and the Lords, with Lords acting as a check on government power.
  2. Although government can introduce statutory instruments, these must be authorised by an existing Act of Parliament.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rule of law in practice in the legal process.

A
  1. No imprisonment without trial
  2. Right to trial by jury for serious offences.
  3. Impartial judges making decisions in civil disputes.
  4. Accessible justice-legal aid.
17
Q

What is substantive law?

A

Law that governs how people are supposed to function.

18
Q

Rule of law in practice in substantive law.

A
  1. Laws in place to protect citizens-e.g., murder, threat
  2. Maximum sentences, keeping state power within bounds
  3. Individuals are free to make contract but the law does try to address power imbalances between parties e.g., CRA 2015
  4. Human Rights Act 1998