Remedies Flashcards
TRO
an injunction for a short period of time
Under Federal rules, TRO expires
on the date set by the court, not to exceed 14 days after the entry of the order unless the court, extends for good cause or the adverse party consents.
Under CA rule a TRO issued without notice of the defendant generally cannot exceed
15 days.
A TRO may be obtained ex parte, which means no notice is afforded to the defendant. The primary purpose of a TRO is to
preserve the status quo until a preliminrary injunction can be held.
Can a TRO be appealed
When will a TRO be denied
No, but it is not effective until the D recieves notice of it
It is is uneforcebale
TRO Elements (Irish Lads Inhale Beer in Dublin)
Irreparable harm
Likelihood of sucess on the merits
Inadequate legal remedies
Balancing of hardships goes towards P
Defenses - None
Pre lim Injunction
an injunction issued before or during a trial that generally is effective until there is a final judgment by the court. Unlike a TRO, a preliminary injunction cannot be issued with the defendant give notice of the hearing an a opportunity to be heard. Plaintiff must show the same elements that are required for a TRO.
Speific preformance
contractual remedy by which a party to a contract is compellted by court order to render the promised performance or subisute. Generally it is not available unless there is a breach of contract.
For the court to grant a plaintiffs request for speific preformance (chocolate cheesecake is my favorite desert)
Valid contract
contract conditions are certain/clear
inadequate legal remedies
mutuality of performance
feasibility of enforcement
no defenses
Recession (equitable remedy) is the avoidance or unamking of a contract. P must show
- grounds for recession
- P sent notice to D as soon as grounds are discovered
-return any benefits it received under the contract to D
Recession, which is only available to the wrong party is generally available when one party has a valid defense to the formation of a contract. Those are
mistake of fact
misrepresentation
Fraud
Being that recession is an equitable remedy the court has
broad discretion in deciding whether it should be awarded.
What will the court consider in the situtation in whcih they award recession
will considered the equities of the situation, taking into account the fairness of recession to both parties.
Because recession is an equitable remedy, it is subject to equitable defenses like
acquiescence, esotppel, laches, and unclean hands.
Fraud / Misrepresentation
A contract may be invlaid on the basis of fraud where 1) a party made a false statement of past or present fact, 2) the statement was either fraudulent or material to the contract and 2) the other party relied on that statement of fact entering into the contact
Doctrine of Mutual mistake
a contract may be invalidated where both parties are mistaken under a material fact that is the basic assumption of the contract
Doctrine of unilateral mistake
a contract may be invalidated where one party is mistaken about a material fact underlying the contract, and the other party knows or has reason to know about the mistake.
Laches
This defense applies where a claimant unreasonably delays in bringing the suit and where the suit prejudices the plaintiff.
Acquiescence
serves as a defense where the plaintiff has previously acquieseced to similar conduct on the part of the defendant for which the plaintiff is now seeking relief.
Unclean hands - equitable defense
P himself engaged in unethical or immoral acts relating to the K
Estoppel
where a defendant reasonably, foreseeably, and detrimentally relied on the plaintiffs statement that the plaintiff’s conduct is permissible and where its equitable defense to enforce that promise.
Reformation a court will not invalidate the contract in its entirety but rather
Who is it available to?
Is it always awarded
rewrite the contract to confirm it to the parties original intent.
Moreover, like recession, reformation is only available to the wrong party.
Because this is a equitable remedy, the court has broad decision in deviding whether it should be awarded.
Resitutionary remedies are appropriate where the tortfeasor
has been unjustly enriched by his activities.
Punitive damages
Awarded when the defendant has displayed willful, wanton or malicious tort conduct. Only awarded if actual damages are awarded, there is culpability, and relatively proportionate to the actual damages
Nominal damages
awarded when there is a violation of someone’s rights but there are no actual damages or if there is damages, the harm is slight
What are the 3 types of compensatory damages?
Expectation, Consequential, incidental
what potential issues can limit consequential damages
casuation, foreseeability, certainty or the duty to mitigate applies
You must prove Causation for Compensatory damages. Causation exists where
Damages must be caused by the tortious act ie be the actual but for cause
Foreseeable
natural and probable consequences of the tort or breach of contract or contemplated by the parties at the time the contract was formed.
Certainty
damages must be capable of being calculated with certainty and not overly speculative
For compensatory damages, you must prove it was Unavoidable. This means
A plaintiff has a duty to take reasonable steps to mitigate his losses