Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Things to remember for the Bar > Evidence > Flashcards

Evidence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards
1
Q

Generally when we are looking for the best evidence rule you want the orginal. What kind of items are related to this rule

A

Writings, recordings and photographs,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

You may use a copy under the best evidence rule if

A

its authenticated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

authentication for best evidence rule means

A

no evidence of any tampering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

when does the best evidence rule apply (2 ways)

A

when I’m trying to prove the contents of the document itself

you need the document to prove what the witness is testifying about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Counterargument to the best evidence rule

A

other available evidence can demonstrate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Completeness rule

A

If one party is admitting part of an overall writing, then the other party can require that the other part of the document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the orginal recording is not required under the best evidence rule if

A

the opposing party has control of the original, was put on notice that the original would be a subject of proof at the trial, and fails to produce the original at the trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

hearsay

A

is an out-of-court statement offered to
prove the truth of the matter asserted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Statements that are not offered for the truth and thus not hearsay

A

words of offer and acceptance
Libel or slander
Verbal Acts to show motive or notice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Present sense impression

A

statement that was made while observing fact that is nonemotional

Think of a reporter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Excited Utterance (spontanous statement) and what words need to be included

A

While under excitement of startling event, a statement made w/o reflection which relates to ([CA] narrates, describes, or explains) the event

IE this is a statement made while I am excited

Shrieked, yelled, yelped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Then existing mental, emotional or physical state of mind

A

Statements that generally go to intent or emotional or physical statement of mind (pain). Cannot be used to prove statements of memory or belief unless in a will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Business record

A

Records of acts, conditions, events, transactions, opinions, or diagnoses made at or near the time of event with personal knowledge of matters during regular course of business. Must have a business duty to do it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Example of business record

A

timesheet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Statement for medical diagnosis or treatment statement for medical diagnosis, or treatment

A

statements related to past or present symptoms relating to diagnosis or treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Recorded rellocation

A

the witness once knew about this document, but now can’t remember made by the witness or he adopted it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Recorded rellocation may be

A

read into evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

absence of business record

A

look for abscense of business record

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Learned treatise

A

you’re looking at for the learned treatise, if an expert witness is relying on it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Ancient document (hearsay exception)

A

more than 20 years old and authenticated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Catch all excetion

A

says any other kind of a statement. Any other statement, that is trustworthy material. And in the interest of justice, we should admit it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Dying Declaration

A

D must be unavailable but does not need to be dead

D has to believe they are dying

D statement is about why their dying
only applies to homicie or civil case,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Statement against interest

A

Unavailable declarant where makes a statement, making him or herself look liable or guilty statement against my own interest AND it cannot be a party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Former testimony

A

Declarant is unavailable and a party in the former case,
the former case is about the same subject matter as the current case.,
made under oath,
they had the opportunity and or motive they had the opportunity and or motive to examine or cross examine the witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Admissions are considered nonhearsay. What is an admission

A

statements made by a party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Vicarious admissions

A

statements made by employees of the company about the liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Adopted admissions

A

silence when an reasonable person would have objected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Are jokes adopted admissions

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Prior consistent statement

A

1) Prior statement by declarant
2) The same as current testimony
3) To refute charge of fabrication or motive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

prior sworn inconsitent statment

A

a prior statement, made under oath,That’s inconsistent with my current testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Prior identification

A

declarant testifying about an erarlie identification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Right to confront witness

A

Right to confront a witness concerning an
out-of-court statement depends on if the
statement is TESTIMONIAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Right to confront witnesses turns on whether

A

testimonal or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What is considered nontestimonal

A

statement made to police during emergency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

what is considered testimonal

A

statement not made during ane mergency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Is Physical and Demonstrative evidence admissiable

A

yes, generally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Example of physical and demonstrative evidence

A

scar, limp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Hearsay upon Hearsay

A

TWO different statements
* NOT Admissible unless both meet an
exception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Logical evidence definition

A

Evidence must be relevant for it to be admissible. It is relevant if it tends to prove/disprove a material fact ([CA] “a material fact in dispute”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

In CA logal evidence must be

A

([CA] “a material fact in dispute”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Legal Relevance applies to the

A

balance probative value (PV) w/ risk of prejudice. A judge has broad discretion to exclude relevant evidence if its PV is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice (UP) (e.g., gore, heroin), confusion of the issues, waste of time (e.g., speculative answer), or misleading the jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What evidence is excluded due to public policy

A

subsequent remedial measures
settlement offers or negoitations
offers to pay medical expenses
Withdrawn Guilty Please
Liability Insurance
Expression of sympathy - CA
Mediation of statement of writing - CA

43
Q

Subsequent remedial measures

A

Evidence of repair or precautions inadmissible to show culpability. Can use to show ownership or control or destruction of evidence, or to rebut claim that precautions were impossible

44
Q

Settlement offers or negoitations

A

Inadmissible to prove liability for, or invalidity of, a claim at actual dispute as to validity or amount of liability. Must exclude all contextual statements attached to offer

45
Q

Withdrawn guility pleas

A

Inadmissible as too prejudicial, minimal PV (but can waive inadmissibility

46
Q

Liability insurance or lack of Can’t use to show culpability but Can use to show

A

ownership or control, to impeach, or as part of admission

47
Q

Expressions of sympathy

A

relating to accident V inadmissible in civil cases, other admissions severable

48
Q

Mediation statements and writings are inadmissible during

A

discovery or proceedings

49
Q

Can you waive mediation statements and writings protection

A

yes

50
Q

Authentication

A

Real or written evidence requires proof to support a jury finding that it is what the proponent claims

51
Q

What does authentication usually require

A

first-hand knowledge or familiarity. Preponderance not needed

52
Q

What are examples of self authenticating docs

A

certified public and business records, trade inscriptions ([CA] N/A), official pubs

53
Q

Best evidence / secondary evidence rule

A

To prove the content of a writing or other tangible collection of data relevant to proving some material fact, the original must be introduced if available. Can still be hearsay

54
Q

When is the original evidence not required

A

lost or destroyed (unless by opponent bad faith), opponent fails to produce, collateral matter, subpoena ineffective, independent source (personal knowledge), inscribed chattel

55
Q

Competnency of witness depends on

A

1) have personal knowledge of the matter and 2) affirm/swear to testify truthfully

56
Q

In CA where judges and jurors may testify if there is no objection, FRE says

A

i. Judge and jurors are incompetent to testify at trial.

57
Q

who makes the inital conditional relevancy

A

judge

58
Q

Judical notice allows a party to

A

prove” an adjudicative (non-collateral) fact by the court’s recognition

59
Q

when must a judge take jducial notice

A

if a party requests and supplies necessary information

60
Q

Character evidence

A

one’s disposition with respect to general traits

61
Q

when is character evidence not allowed

A

to prove conduct in conformity therewith. (Just because Δ did [specific bad things showing similar character] before does not mean he did [charged act] in this case.)

62
Q

What is MIMIC Evidence

A

MIMIC evid
Motive
Intent
Mistake (absence of)
Identity (signature m.o.)
Common plan

63
Q

what r the 3 ways to prove character evidence

A

reputation
opinion
speific acts (on cross)

64
Q

When can you use speific acts on direct

A

Δ opens the door or Δ alleges self-defense in homicide

In CA you can use rep/op/sp on direct and cross

65
Q

In CA when the D opens the door and says V is of bad pertient character to show D’s innocence, P can only rebut in CA after

A

D’s evidene of V’s violent character

66
Q

When can you bring in on direct evidence of character

A

when the character is an elment at issue

67
Q

In what instances is when the character is an element at issue

A

i. Defamation (B said A is a thief). Defenses: reputation testimony, truth (A is indeed a thief)
ii. Negligent hiring (bring up all traffic offenses of employee)
iii. Negligent entrustment (loan car to someone, should have known not a good idea to lend it)
iv. Child custody (fitness as parent) v. Self-defense: Survivor’s reasonable belief of imminent deadly harm
vi. Entrapment: Δ had no predisposition commit the crime – but raises predisposition element for Π to rebut

68
Q

What is habit evidence and what should you look for

A

semi-automatic response to a specific and frequent situation. For an organization, a habit is a routine practice of the org. Look for 2+ occurrences, “always,” “every day,” “frequently,” “instinctively”

69
Q

when is a statement not hearsay because it being introduced for another purpose

A

legally operative facts of independent legal significance (e.g., K terms, defamatory words), effect on listener (notice, knowledge, motive), knowledge of speaker, or state of mind (insanity, belief)

70
Q

In CA what are the two hearsay exceptions if the Declarant is unavailable

A

threat of physical harm and past physical or mental conditions

71
Q

Threat of physical harm (CA exception)

A

Statement that describes or explains infliction or threat of physical injury on declarant is admissible if 1) made at or near time of infliction or threat, 2) circumstances indicate trustworthiness, 3) in writing, recorded, made to police or medical personnel

72
Q

Present recollection revived

A

Testifying witness can refresh memory by looking at any evidence (no hearsay problem because evidence itself is offered into evidence)

73
Q
  1. Past recollection recorded: A record that is on a matter
A

1) testifying witness once had personal knowledge of but now cannot recall well enough (refreshing attempted and fails), 2) was made or adopted by W when the matter was fresh in memory, and 3) accurately reflects W’s knowledge

74
Q

Public records

A

Records made within scope of duty of a public employee, entered at or near time of event.

75
Q

Examples of public records that are admissible

A

activities of the office or agency, description of matters observed pursuant to duty (inadmissible if untrustworthy or [FRE] police observations in criminal case), factual findings from investigation by authority (only in civil cases or [FRE] if used against gov’t in criminal cases)

76
Q

What r other issues that can arise with public records

A

if a police record not qualifying as business record, it can be submitted under public records

absecence of public records as long as there was a diligent search

Prior judgeent against a D to prove an essiental document

77
Q

Anicent documents are excpetions to hearsay because

A

Statements in 20YO+ document are admissible and self-authenticating ([CA] 30YO+)

78
Q

Family Records are exceptions to hearsay because

A

Statements of fact concerning personal or family history found in family keepsakes

79
Q

When can you use testimonal evidence and impechment

A

to attack crediability or truthfulness

80
Q

what can a laywitness Can testify as to opinions or inferences only if testimony is

A

1) rationally based on perception (personal knowledge, 5 senses),
2) helpful to a clear understanding to determination of a material fact or of his own testimony, and
3) [FRE] not based on scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge (unless grossly apparent)

81
Q

What requirements must an expert witness meet to be admissible

A

1) Specialized knowledge helpful to jury, 2) qualified as expert, 3) reasonable certainty of opinion, 4) testimony based on proper facts or data, 5) testimony based on reliable principles and methods.

82
Q

What are expert reliability factors

A

1) ) generally accepted in relevant scientific community, 2) peer reviewed (capable of retesting), 3) published, 4) low error rate. [CA] Reliable if generally accepted

83
Q

what can the expert witness not testify to

A

conclusory legal opinions, criminal Δ’s mental state if element of crime or defense

84
Q

What is rehabilitation

A

Impeached W may be rehabilitated on redirect or by EE: W may explain original response; another W may testify to rep or op for truthfulness; pt may show prior consistent statement (only to defeat charge of fabrication) made before time of alleged motive to lie or exaggerate

85
Q

exceptions to leading witnesses

A

) hostile (unwilling) witnesses, 2) adverse witnesses, 3) child witnesses, 4) solicit preliminary background information (“You’re licensed, right?”), or 5) refresh W’s recollection

86
Q

what are other basis for objection to forms of question

A

nonresponsive
Q/A requiring speculation,
compound question
loaded question
argumentative calling for a narrative

87
Q

What is nonresponsive and how do you fix it

A

(answer to different Q or no answer, may be stricken by motion to strike),

88
Q

compound question

A

(more than 1 at a time),

89
Q

Loaded questions

A

(assumes facts—answer requires unintended admission: “Have you stopped beating your wife?”),

90
Q

Argumentive

A

(prompts W to draw legal conclusion),

91
Q

Calls for narrative

A

asks for story, not facts

92
Q

what are the 4 types of privileges

A

Attorney-client
spousal testimonal
Martital communications
Physican/pyschotherapist-patient prcillege (State only)

93
Q

Attorney client privillege

A

Communication between client and atty (or representative employed to assist in rendering legal services, e.g., physician examines client at atty’s request)

intended by client to be confidential and made with purpose to seek legal advice is privileged indefinitely, unless waived by client ([CA] ends when estate distributed).

Attorney may invoke privilege on client’s behalf.

Voluntary disclosure waives privilege w/r/t/ disclosed material

94
Q

What are the exceptions to ac privillege

A

FRE - what client should have known was a crime or fraud, between former joint clients, dispute between attorney and client,

CA-reasonably necessary to prevent death or serious bodily harm

95
Q

Spousal testimonial which applies to criminal case in FRE it applies to civil/crim in

A

CA

96
Q

Spousal priviellge is held by ___ and covers ? How can you waive it

A

i. Held by witness. Must be married at time of testimony. Covers observations and communications

97
Q

What are exceptions to the spousal privillege

A

suits against each other, crime against a spouse or either spouse’s child, joint furtherance of future crime or fraud (spouses are co-Δ)

98
Q

Martial communication is held by ___ and covers ? How can you waive it

A

Covers confidential spousal comm’n from during marriage. Waived by known eavesdroppers

99
Q

Martital communication rule

A

Privilege not to disclose private communication between spouses (civil/crim)

100
Q

Spousal testimonal privillege

A

Privilege not to testify against spouse in criminal cases ([CA] applies to civil/crim)

101
Q

Physician / psychotherapist patient privilege

A

Confidential medical communication between professional and patient made with purpose of diagnosis or treatment. Patient holds privilege (doc may claim privilege on patient’s behalf if patient cannot)

102
Q

Exceptions to Physician / psychotherapist patient privilege

A

patient puts his condition at issue (e.g., personal injury suit), important to prevent injury to a person, sought to aid planning of crime/tort

103
Q

6A confrontation clause overrides hearsay and it is

A

a. Any prior out-of-court testimonial statements by an unavailable declarant are inadmissible against CRIMINAL Δ, unless Δ has had prior opportunity to x-exam declarant at the time of statement, absent forfeiture caused by Δ’s wrongful act intended to keep the witness from testifying

104
Q

Prop 8 Exceptions (CHOP SUR)

A

Consiution
Hearsay
Open the door
Privilege
Secondary evidence rule
Unfair prejudice
Rape-sheild statutes

Things to remember for the Bar (21 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions