Religous Experience Flashcards

1
Q

William James

Noetic quality

A

Knowledge achieve in a seemingly unbelievable way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

William James

Transiency

A

The experience has to end, travelling at a different time rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

William James

Passivity

A

Recognises gods power, he initiated the experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

William James

Ineffability

A

Indescribable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Williams James

3 reasons REs are evidence

A

Psychologist - number of REs says there’s something in it

Pluralism - all religions have truths

Pragmatism - it positively change lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Religious experience

Freuds Criticism

A

Humans are plagued with wishful thinking

Psycho-somatic experience

Conversion meets the psychological needs of people, they desire a father figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Religious experience

Starbuck

A

Most conversions happen between ages 18-24

People more stressed and easily influenced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Religious experience

Marx

A

“Religion is the opiate of the people”

Religion controls society, gets people through life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Religious experience

Swinburne Principle of credulity

A

Senses are usually reliable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Religious experience

Swinburne Principle of testimony

A

Most of the time people tell the truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Religious experience

Maurice wells

A

If REs are real, god is immoral, choosing to reveal himself to a select few

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Religious experience

Vardys principles

A

A change for the better
Has religious significance
Against the laws of nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Religious experience

Hume

A

“A transgression of a law of nature”

The breaking of a law by a supernatural agents, highly improbable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Religious experience

Vardy criticism of Hume

A

Human experience says laws of nature aren’t usually broken

A testimony must simply be stronger than the odds against it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Religious experience

Bertrand Russell

A

“The fact that belief has a good moral effect upon a man is no evidence whatsoever in favour of its truth”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Religious experience

Anthony Flew

A

Statements that aren’t tested empirically are meaningless

James focuses too much on the individual and not if god is actually proved as real

Believers in different faiths all use RE as truth for their faiths

17
Q

Religious experience

Vardy

A

“most stories of miracles come from ignorant and barbarous notions”

We are predisposed to love the fantastic

18
Q

Religious experience

Vardy crit of NML

A

NMLs don’t exist, just gods habits,

We need regularity to function so no rules are broken by god doing what’s not his norm

19
Q

Religious experience

Schliermacher

A

Only oneself can define if an experience is religious

Everyone has a consciousness of the divine

20
Q

Religious experience

Strengths of corporate experiences

A

More numerically valid

Suggests experiences are not from individual imaginations

21
Q

Religious experience

Weaknesses of corporate experiences - Hank Hanegraafff

A

Corporate experiences ‘mass hypnosis’

22
Q

Religious experience

Weaknesses of corporate experiences - William Sergeant

A

Mass religious experiences down to conditioning

23
Q

Religious experience

Weaknesses of corporate experiences - John White

A

“Learned patterns of behaviour”

24
Q

Religious experience

Weaknesses of individual experiences

A

No witnesses

Lack of empirical evidence