Religious language Flashcards

1
Q

(Apophatic way)

The Via Negativa

meaning = “the negative way”

A
  • states that one can only speak of God in negative terms – God is transcendent so one cannot say what God is, therefore we can only say what he is not
  • Our language cannot tell people about God as he is beyond human comprehension
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pseudo-Dionysius

‘Via Negativa’

A
  • argued for the apothatic way
  • to genuienly seek God we must put away our need for answers and logic.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Maimomides

via negativa

A
  • stated that God is beyond any description & to make positive statements describing God is improper & disrespectful
  • To describe God in this way limits him to human language & understanding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

weakness

Flew on the Via Negativa

A
  • Antony Flew – negatives ultimately amount to nothing, we are left with no clear image of what God is
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Counter-Weakness: of the via negativa

The Bible describes God in positive terms.

A
  • The Bible describes God in positive terms. “God is love” and “God is spirit - The Bible therefore seems to suggest that via posititiva language about God is valid.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Non-cognitive language

A
  • Language that is not empircally verifiable or flasiable butt instead expresses an attitude towrads something.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cognitive Language

A
  • Language that is empirically verifable and makes assertions about objective reality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The cataphatic way (via postivia)

A
  • Aquinas - we can use positive words as long as we understand that the words are analogical not literal.
  • E.G. When we say God listern we do not mean with his ears he hears us. But it is analogy that helps us know God.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Keyword

Univocal language:

A
  • words only have one meaning, whether using for god or temporally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

keyword

Equivocal language

A
  • Words that mean different things when used in different contexts (E.G. Fruit bat & crcket bat)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aquinas’ theory of Analogy

A
  • he thought humans were fundamentally unable to know God
  • he argued we can talk about God meaningfully in positive terms (cataphatic way) if we speak analogically.
  • Aquinas rejected univocal lang s it does not convey the greatness & mystery of God - God is beyond our understanding.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aquinas

Analogy of Attribution

A

analogy can be used to learn attributes of what you dont know, from what you do know
- the bull and the urine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Aquinas

Analogy of Proportion.

A
  • when words relate to differnt objects in different proportions
  • (e.g loving god v. loving nurse)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Symbols: using symbols that talk about God.

A
  • language is often figurative and solves problems of making positive claims about god whilst not reducing him
  • A religious people use symbolic language all the time e.g Psalm 23:1 “The lord is my shepherd”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Tillich’s view of religous language

A
  • All religious language is symbolic rather than literal - therefore cannot be tested for its meaningfulness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly