Plato & Aristotle: ancient philosophical influences Flashcards
introduction - Heraclitus
- Heraclitus thought that the world we experience is in a state of constant change which he called ‘flux’.
- thus how can we gain true and certain knowledge if everything changes?
- Aristotle thinks that we can understand the causal mechanism responsible for change and thereby gain true knowledge from experience
Plato
- Like Heraclities, he believed that everythng in the world changes
- therefore there must be a world where things are unchanging (logic of opposite) = this is called the World of Forms
- also a dualist (mind + body are separate)
The Allerogy of the Cave
Found in the book REPUBLIC (380bc)
- shows experience involves mere shadows of reality, thus cannot give us knowledge
- Only a priori reasoning involving understanding of the forms can give us knowledge.
Above the slaves, is a fire that casts shadow of certain figures and objects. A prisoner then escapes and is blinded by the form of the good (the sun) & sees the real world. Then he goes back to his fellow prisoners to tell them but they didnt understand becuse the material world blinds people..
Aristoltes rejection to plato’s thought
- Plato’s theory lacks empirical validity. Aristotle thought that Plato’s theory of forms was an unnecessary hypothesis = because it has no explanatory power regarding our experience
- This is an early version of Ockham’s razor
- scientists better criticise this and claim that the physical world is the only reality there is. Dawkins states that ‘its nonsense to talk of a trascendent ‘other world’ beyond the physical.
Plato Demiurge
- he believed that the world was created by a demiurge = greek word for a workman
ARISTOLE understanding of reality
- rejected rationalism
- an empirisit: knowlegde is gain through our senses
- one of his observation of the worlds was that everything has a purpose (TELOS) = to know things properly we need to understand its purpose.(its essence)
aristoles 4 causes
Aristotle believe the physical world is always changing, imperfect and transient (not eternal).
It moves in a state of potentiality to actuality
Reality can be explained in four different ways: four causes
- material - what the item is made of (E.G. a bronze statue is made out of bronze)
- formal - the distinguishing characteristic of the item
- efficient cause: Who/what made the particular arrangement
- final cause - the telos/the reason or purpose behind it.
aristole prime mover
- For Aristotle the world is in a constant motion of change.
- This PM was God. The Prime Mover is in a state of pure actuality- it has no potential for change itself.
- Mover is the FINAL cause.
- The Prime Mover is perfect and all things want to imitate this perfection.
- This attraction to perfection provides a PURPOSE for change.
- Therefore the Prime Mover is the FINAL cause.
- this unchanging, eternal nature is convinving
evaluation on the prime mover
- To argue the universe must have a purpose is wrong. It just exists by chance. what is that purpose?
- Dawkins- “The universe we observe has no design, no purpose…”
- Hume also made this point as part of his criticisms of the cosmological argument.
How does plato rationalism compare with Aristotles empircism?
- Plato’s rationalist approach meant that he relied on logical truths, which he claimed all humans obtained from another realm.
- Aristotle, approached the world with and empirical viewpoint, based his theories on the physical world around him.