Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

phil > Religious Experiences > Flashcards

Religious Experiences Flashcards

1
Q

Define a Religious experience

A
  • a mental event undergone by an individual’
  • Can be spontaneous or brought about as a result of intensive training and self-discipline
  • non-empirical occurrence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two types of Religious experience? + e.g.

A
  • Corporate - Shared between groups of people
    e.g. Toronto Blessing 1994
    –> Many people visited Pentecostal church, underwent religious experience e.g. laughing hysterically, Barking like Dog + speaking in tongues
    e.g. Virgin Mary in Bosnia , 1981
    –> Virgin Mary appearing + giving messages e.g. “I have come to tell the world God exists”
  • Individual - experienced by one person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2 examples of Corporate RE

A
  • Toronto Blessing 1994
    –> Many people visited Pentecostal church, underwent religious experience e.g. laughing hysterically, Barking like Dog + speaking in tongues
  • Virgin Mary in Bosnia , 1981
    –> Virgin Mary appearing + giving messages e.g. “I have come to tell the world God exists”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Strengths to Corporate RE

A
  • More Numerically valid
    –> more people saying same story = more reliable and credible than one individual
  • Multiple people lessons likelihood was one person imagination or external factor e.g. Drug
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Critiques + Scholars for Corporate RE?

A
  • Hank Hanegraaff –> Result of Mass hypnosis
  • John White –> Corporate Experiences due to “learned patterns of behaviour”
    –> Religious conditioning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who created the 4 Classification Characteristics for Religious Experiences + what were they?

A
  • William James
  • 19th Century
  1. Ineffable - beyond human description,
  2. Noetic - new insight +knowledge, Gods revelation,
  3. Transient - temporary + changes time perception,
    4.Passive - Out of your control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Did William James think RE or Religious institutions had primacy

A

Religious Experiences have primacy over church / Religious traditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were James’ Classification Characteristics for RE?

A
  1. Ineffable
    –> Direct experience of God goes beyond human powers of description
  2. Noetic
    –> Gain knowledge + insight
    –> Revelation of God into out minds
  3. Transient
    –> do not last a long time
    –> Change sense of time / duration
  4. Passive
    –> Not in control of experience, something acted upon you
    –> could convince yourself you are not the source of experience you willed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Principle of Credulity?

A

Swinburne 21st Century
- If an event seems to have happened, it probably has.
- Ought to believe things unless given evidence otherwise - mostly relating to a persons own RE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the Principle of Testimony?

A
  • If someone says event has happened it probably has, unless given legitimate reason to doubt them
    –> otherwise we become sceptical of everything anyone says, which is not accurate to every day life (i.e. believe someone’s warnings about bad weather - Hume critique)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are Swinburne’s 2 Principles

A
  • Principle of Credulity - If an event seems to have happened, it probably has - unless given evidence against - own RE
  • Principle of Testimony- Someone says event has happened it probably has, unless given legitimate reason to doubt them - 3rd parties RE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Critical 2 Scholar of Swinburne’s principles?

A

Credulity - Michael Martin - Negative Credulity
- Atheist’s do not experience God, using the Principle of Credulity, this count’s against God existence
–> when experiencing the absence of God should trust that

  • Swinburne (Richard) states that his principle only applies to positive experiences (Cannot state that just because you don’t experience something it doesn’t exist )

Testimony - David Hume
- Should be sceptical about testimony unless given a reason to trust it
- when making extraordinary claim requires extra ordinary evidence - (claiming existence of God different to claiming existence of rain)

–> Swinburne (not response) Assessment of prior probability is vital to the argument
- If existence is highly improbable then you are more skeptical e.g. Lock Ness Monster
Swinburne claims God’s existence is more probable than not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are 3 reasons we can doubt someone’s testimony (Swinburne)

A
  • We can doubt corresponding with Principles of Credulity + Testimony if;
    1. Person was mistaken
    2. God doesn’t exist
    Evident to suggest event was not caused by God e.g. drugs
  • Disbelief of someone can stem from belief they are mistaken –> brings us back to begining
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Swinburne’s method of categorising RE

A

5 types - 2 Public experience categories, 3 Private
- Public Experience
1. Ordinary (interpreting normal event in religious way. e.g. seeing Mary in moon (Glee grilled Chesus)
2. Extraordinary experience (witnessing an unusual event e.g. resurrection of Christ

  • Private
    3. Describe in normal language - can be explained e.g. Angel Gabriel appearing to Mary
    4. Not described in normal language e.g. Mysticism, unable to describe, ineffable
    5. Ongoing, no specific experience e.g. sense of God guiding one’s life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Cumulative Case + What Arguments are used?

A

Basil Mitchell
- Accumulation of Multiple Argument’s for God means existence is more likely

3 Arguments
- Cosmological (universe needs creator), Design (design means creator), Moral (morality requires source)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which Scholar critiques Cumulative Case + why?

A

Antony Flew
- ‘ten leaky buckets’ analogy
Claimed 10 flawed arguments do not make one good one

17
Q

What Oxford data backs up RE?

A

Oxford Religious Experience Research Unit
- 40% of British population say aware of a presence beyond themselves

18
Q

Mystical experience definition? (what it includes)

A

When people feel they have reached an understanding of spiritual truth which cannot be accessed through ‘normal’ senses

Encompasses;
- Events people see visions or hear voices,
- Moments people feel overwhelming presence of God,
- Times people feel they have encountered or united with God.

19
Q

4 Examples of Christian Mysticism / RE

A

St. Bernadette , Julian of Norwich, St. Teresa, Saul’s Conversion

St Bernadette
- Went to grotto to collect water, saw + spoke to Mary Mother of God
- Has become pilgrimage for healing - collection of walking stick were people went with ailments + left without
- Popular with Roman Catholics (vicious circle)

Julian of Norwich
- 14th Century
- Series of 16 visions whilst on deathbed
- Claimed saw Jesus on cross at end of deathbed
Critiques –> Vicious cycle - was Catholic. Physiological Challenges - seriously ill, scientifically proven people have hallucinations before death

St. Teresa
- Claimed God pierced her heart with his dart.
Internal –> I experienced God piercing my heart
External –> God pierced by heart
Gap between appearance and reality (internal happening doesn’t mean external did)

Saul’s Conversion
- Devout Jew,, on road to Damascus to persecute followers of Christ, was blinded on road
–> taken to Jesus and given his eyesight back

20
Q

What did Rudolf Otto say about Religious Experiences?

A

All RE are ‘Numinous’ experiences
–> Individuals gain new / deeper understanding of reality, have touched a different dimension

21
Q

What are the 4 Main challenges to Religious Experiences

A
  • Vicious Circle Challenge - RE dependent on prior knowledge
  • Conflicting Claims Challenge - RE can support all religions, meaning equally truthful (none truthful)
  • Psychological Challenge - Psychological factors e.g. epilepsy or deathbed
  • Anti-Realist Challenge - No direct experiences, Vardy - privilege few experience RE, Lash - God in Everday
22
Q

Explain the Vicious Circle Challenge to RE?

A
  • Religious experience depends on prior assumptions/ knowledge of those involved
    e.g. Catholics more likely to experience Mary (St. Bernadette)
    –> More likely generated by existing faith commitments –> Change people’s focus / interoperation
23
Q

Explain the Conflicting Claims Challenge to RE?

A
  • If Christian RE underwrites Christianity, then Islamic RE should underwrite Islam etc.
  • If one religion relies of RE to prove its truth then each religion can claim the same
    –> implies each religion is equally true
  • Hume “complete triumph for the sceptic’
24
Q

Explain the Psychological Challenge the RE?

A

RE can be explained by psychological factors
–> e.g. Saul on road to Damascus could be due to epileptic fit
–> e.g. Julian of Norwich had visions on death bed, seriously ill people proven to have hallucinations

25
Q

Explain the Anti-Realist Challenge to RE? + Scholar

A
  • RE is not a direct experience of God – Simply the way the world is seen by a Religious Believer
  • Rejects individual experiences of the divine (By William James)

Peter Vardy
- People learn to see world in Religious as as a result of schooling and religious tradition.

26
Q

Which Scholar said God is seen in the Everyday + explain?

A
  • Nicholas Lash
  • God only experienced in Everyday
  • Rejects Direct RE (as James claims) as makes religion dependent on a privileged few
    –> God loved everyone, why only allow few to experience direct revelation
27
Q

What did Nicholas Lash say criticising RE?

A
  • God only experienced in Everyday
  • Rejects Direct RE (as James claims) as makes religion dependent on a privileged few
    –> God loved everyone, why only allow few to experience direct revelation
28
Q

What kind of RE did William Alston focus on + why ?

A
  • 20th Century
    Direct and Non-sensory experiences of God
  • Believed this was most plausible presentation of a spiritual God.
29
Q

Which Philosopher’s critique of RE did Alston give a direct response to + what were both points?

A

Kant
- 18th Century
- Claimed RE was limited to 5 senses
Alston
- 20th Century
- Animals have more senses than humans e.g. detecting magnetic and electrical fields
- Why cant humans experience these

30
Q

What is Alston’s House? (RE)

A
  • William Alston 20th Century
  • When we Experience God we understand him through comparisons and drawing on our own knowledge
    –> e.g. if you saw your house from 50,00ft away you would see it as you expect it to be, based on previous knowledge
    God is experiences as believers expect God to be
  • More people likely to relation RE to previous knowledge e.g. Vicious circle
31
Q

What is Alston’s Perceptual Model

A

beats me

32
Q

Who are the 6 Wider Scholars critiquing RE (excluding Vardy + Lash +Kant + Flew)

A
  • Ludwig Feuerbach - RE is illusion of fear + longing for community
  • Karl Marx - RE way of escaping Realty of oppression + providing false meaning
  • Sigmond Freud - RE childlike weakness + helplessness in face of Nature - collective neurosis
  • Richard Dawkins - virus of the mind, RE = trying to pass virus on
  • Bertrand Russell - scientific principles - man who eats to little see’s God, man who drinks to much see’s snakes
  • Thomas Hobbes - Re is equivalent to dreaming
33
Q

What was Ludwig Feuerbach’s critique of RE?

A
  • 19th Century
    God is “illusion” of man’s inward nature –> help’s us deal with fears + aspirations
  • RE is people reflecting on inwards fear + desires
  • People wanting to find community through RE –> e.g. Toronto Blessing
  • Visions of God = ‘Placebo effect’
34
Q

What was Karl Marx’s critique of RE?

A
  • 19th Century
  • Religion removes self determination
  • Religion survives due to oppressive social conditions “opium of the People”
  • RE used to provide false meaning + fulfilment
    –> way of escaping realities of oppression
35
Q

What was Sigmond Freud’s critique of RE?

A
  • 19th Century Neurologist
  • Religion as collective neurosis of mankind
  • RE is reflection of Childlike weakness and helplessness in face of harsh nature
36
Q

What was Richard Dawkin’s critique of RE?

A
  • 21st Century Biologist
  • RE = brain creating sights + sounds similar to real world, so convincing it fools your
  • Religion as “virus of the mind”
    –> RE is virus trying to pass itself onto others
37
Q

What was Bertrand Russell’s critique of RE?

A
  • 20th Century
  • RE explained by scientific principles not supernatural
    –> even if someone changes after RE doesn’t mean it was God
  • “make no distinction between man who eats to little and sees heaven and man who drinks to much and sees snakes”
    –> Psychological Challenge
38
Q

What was Thomas Hobbes’ critique of RE?

A
  • 17th Century
  • RE is equivalent to dreaming
    –> to say God spoke to someone in dream is to say they had a dream God spoke to them

phil (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions