Problem of Evil 😈 Flashcards

1
Q

Who discovered the Problem of Evil?

A

Ancient Greek Philosopher Epicurus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the ā€˜inconsistent triad’ and who developed it?

A

Developed by J.L. Mackie in 1977.
States that
1. If God were all loving (omnibenevolent), then he would wish to abolish evil
2. If God were all-powerful (omnipotent) , he would be able to abolish evil

Gods omnibenevolence, Gods omnipotence and existence of evil and suffering cannot all be true at the same time

–> Therefore, God is not all-powerful not all-loving or both or doesn’t exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is the Problem of Evil an objection to all Gods?

A

No. e.g. Aristotles Prime Mover is indifferent to human suffering
- Mostly an objection to the Christian God (or other Abrahamic religions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Difference between logical and evidential Problem of Evil

A
  • Logical = Inconsistent triad - God’s existence should mean no evil in world at all
  • Evidential = Trying to determine what extent of evil would be evidence against the existence of God.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kind of argument is the Evidential problem of evil + what does it say about small vs large amount of evil

A
  • A Posteriori argument (based on experience)
  • Small amount of evil could be justified to distinguish between right + wrong or provide motivation to ā€˜do the right thing’
    –> But evidence of unnecessary evil e.g. Holocaust suggests God doesn’t exists

–> the amount of evil and suffering present in the world cannot be reconciled with the classical God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the difference between Moral and Natural evil?

A
  • Moral evil - Evil caused by free moral agents e.g. Sandy Hook Massacre or 9/11
  • Natural Evil - Suffering caused by natural events e.g. Hurricane Katrina
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What comes first Evil or Suffering

A

The result of Evil is Suffereing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a Theodicy? (include in intro)

A

A theodicy is an attempt to explain how belief in a good, omnipotent God can be maintained in the face of evil and suffering in the world

Theos = God Dikaios = Justification (not as important)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the main point of Augustine’s ā€˜Soul-deciding’ theodicy?

A

Augustine argues that God created all things good, Evil is not good therefore God did not create evil meaning Evil is ā€˜not a thing’.
- Evil as privation of Good

  • Evil exists because God gave humans free will, When humans abuse this free will they commit evil acts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What Biblical quote did Augustine use to back up his theodicy

A

Genesis 1 ā€œGod saw all that he had made, and it was very goodā€ - God created a world free from evil and suffering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If for Augustine Evil was not ā€˜a thing’ what did he think it was?

A
  • Evil is not a physical entity it is a privation (absence) of Good
  • Evil is like a shadow formed from a privation (lack) of light, rather than a physical entity itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Augustine say about Men and Angels

A
  • There is a hierarchy amongst all beings.
    –> Men + Angels were crated equal both with free will
  • Through humanities choices e.g. Adam and Eve we displayed a lack of goodness (committed sins)
  • Original sin and the fall was the choice by Adam and Eve not to live in harmony with God.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why did Augustine belive free will within humans as neccessary?

A

Without the possibility of corruption we would not be able to understand goodness.
- Free-will is a necessity.
- Since there is happiness for those who do not sin the world is perfect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Augustine use ā€˜the fall’ as an example of?

A

The Fall - Genesis 3 - is an example of how everything was created ā€˜good’ but human abuse of free will led to sin and the consequence of evil then suffering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Augustine’s Aesthetic Principle

A

Building on his ā€˜soul deciding’ theodicy.
- Augustine believe the privation (absence) of goodness allows for Characters of good to be appreciated more
e.g. Beauty can be more easily witnessed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 4 main criticism of Augustines ā€˜Soul deciding’ theodicy?

A

Science
- Modern science - Hick states Augustines theory is ā€œimplausibleā€ due to Dawin’s theory of evolution.
–> A Fall from perfection is inaccurate It is not possible for the world to be created perfectly as evolution creates more efficient ā€˜perfect’ beings.

Adam and Eve’s Sin
- Why does all humanity share the punishment for a sin originally committed by Adam and Eve.

God’s responsibility
- Are natural disasters humanities fault (via Adam). Does this retain notion of loving + merciful God
—> However, If humans were less uncaring, greedy or selfish a lot of natural disasters e.g. famines would be reduced.

Perfection
- If God created humans to be perfect why would they sin - would true perfection contain possiblity for curruption
–> Freidrich Schleiermacher - The fact the fall took place proves God did not create humans perfectly
–> J.L. Mackie - Why did God not create freewilled humans that never sin?

17
Q

What is the Ireanean theodicy also known as + who developed it and when?

A
  • Also known as the ā€˜soul-making’ theodicy
  • Developed by 2nd Century Christian theologist St. Irenaeus
18
Q

What are the main points of Irenaeus’s ā€˜soul-making’ theodicy?

A
  • Humans were created in the ā€˜image’ of God not his ā€˜likeness’ meaning we are immature and imperfect
  • We were created with free will but not created perfectly
  • Life is a testing ground where man can grow towards the likeness of God
  • Evil is necessary for human development, people given the freedom to make mistakes enables them to learn + grow from suffering to become better people
19
Q

What did Irenaeus’s say about Adam and Eve’s ā€˜Fall’?

A

Adam and Eve’s sin was not catastrophic but a childish mistake of growing moral knowledge

20
Q

What is a criticism of the Irenaean theodicy based on Genesis?

A
  • God was Angry and punished Adam and Eve heavily for eating the fruit, if this was a necessary mistake he wouldn’t have had this reaction.
21
Q

What is the Epistemic distance? (Ireanean theodicies views + purspoe for this)

A

God is distant from humanity (not spatially but epistemically) –> do not fully understand God or know his intentions / reasoning for things
- Humans have limitations and need faith + revelation to bridge this gap
- Ireanians believe man can lessen this distance + gain knowledge of God through acting morally
–> Argued God is at an epistemic distance from humans –> ensure belief in him is a free choice not coerced

22
Q

What is Hicks (Irenaean-type) theodicy criteria?

A

Criteria for successful theodicy must be
- Logically coherent
- Plausible in Modern Age

23
Q

What is Hicks (Irenaean-type) theodicy’s two stage conception of Human kind?

A
  1. Image of God
    - People created in image of God with potential to grow into likeness. At this stage they are imperfect + immature
  2. Likeness of God
    Creation complete when humans mature into likeness of God - only possible through experience of evil
24
Q

What is Hicks theodicy also known as?

A

ā€˜Vale of soul-making’ - the world is a place where individuals are morally strengthened an improved

25
Critique of Hick's vale of soul-making?
- Michael Tooley --> argues suffering of people with terminal illness, and suffering of children and animals does not lead to any moral developments
26
What is the Eschaton? + Hick's view
Eschaton = Day at the end of time when God will decide the fates of man - Hick believes after death we continue to learn and develop morality
27
Criticisms of Irenaean and Hick's theodicy
Man is created perfectly - Hick + Irenaean theodicy states humans were not created perfectly - at odds with biblical account. Do the ends justify the means - Is all the suffering justifiable. --> D.Z. Phillips - Argued suffering cannot be justified e.g. Stating Holocaust happened so people could grow gives those that died no value, is callous and adds to the evil in the world. --> Richard Swinburne - suffering can be beneficial, humans need to experience pail to inform natural decisions making. Logically coherent - If end result is reaching God + closing epistemic distance how can philosophers maintain that humanity possesses free-will Plausible in modern age - Is idea of eschaton plausible in the modern age. Discredits Jesus death on the cross - discredits importance of Jesus death as atonement for sins. Jesus death has no significance for salvation.
28
What is J.L. Mackie's criticism of the idea of free-will?
In addition to God creating a world of good without free will, or a world with free will but evil, could create world with free will were everyone chooses good. Argument - Logically possible to choose to do good - Logically possible to choose to do good in every situation - Logically possible to do good through life - God could have created a world were everyones genuinely free, but choose to do good. - God did not create this world - Either God is not omnipotent or now fully good
29
Explain A.N. Whitehead's process theodicy
20th Century States God is not omnipotent - God creates order out of pre-existing Chaos - God is continually part of the unfolding creation - When process is harmonious, produces good - When process is disruptive, produces evil - God tries to coax humanity into doing good, but does not have total control of us - God suffers when world suffers through evil - God is still responsible for good and evil --> Creates stronger bond between God and humans
30
What is D.Z. Phillips critique of theodicies? (relating to holocaust)
- Theodicies try to claim suffering + evil happen so we can appreciate Good more (e.g. Augustines Aesthetic principle) - So say holocaust happened so an observer can grow is to say nothing of the people who died - Adds a callousness itself which adds to totality of evil in the world