religious conflicts Flashcards
what did arminian theology suggest
Arminian theology laid emphasis on clerical authority and the individual’s capacity to reject salvation, and was seen as heretical and a potential vehicle for the reintroduction of Roman Catholicism by its opponents.
what was C view of Arminianism
Charles’s sympathy to the teachings of Arminianism, and specifically his wish to move the Church of England away from Calvinism in a more traditional and sacramental direction, confirmed the Puritans’ suspicions concerning the perceived irreligious tendencies of the crown.
what is the history regarding oppression of protestnats
A long history of opposition to tyrants who oppressed Protestants had developed since the beginning of the Protestant Reformation, most notably during the French Wars of Religion (articulated in the Vindiciae contra tyrannos), and more recently in the Second Defenestration of Prague at the start of the Thirty Years’ War.
how did the history surrounding protestnat oppression affect C
Such cultural identifications struck a chord with Charles’s subjects dismayed by Charles failure to support the Protestant cause abroad and his contacts with Spain.
Such allegations dogged Charles due to the actions of king and council, especially Archbishop William Laud.
when did Laud become archbishop of canterbury
1633
issue with Laud
- began a series of unpopular reforms eg dismissing non-conformist clergymen, and closing Puritan organisations.
- His policy was opposed to Calvinist theology, and he insisted that the Church of England’s liturgy use the Book of Common Prayer, and that the internal architecture of English churches emphasise the sacrament of the altar, thereby attacking predestination.
how did laud enforce his policy
used the two most feared and most arbitrary courts in the land, the Court of High Commission and the Court of Star Chamber to enforce this.
what could the court of high commission do
could force a person to provide self-incriminating testimony
what could the court of star chmaber do
could inflict any punishment (including torture), except of death.
what happened by 1633 regarding the star chamber and high commission
By 1633 Star Chamber had effectively, taken the place of High Commission as the supreme tribunal for religious offences as well as dealing with Crown cases of a secular nature.
what happened regualury under C regarding star chamber
Under Charles’s reign, defendants were regularly brought before the Court without indictment, due process of the law, or right to confront witnesses, and their testimonies were routinely extracted by torture.
what happened regarding religious polices in Scotland
faced resistance
what did C do in 1637 in Scot
king ordered the use of a new Prayer Book to be used within Scotland that was almost identical to the English Book of Common Prayer, without consultation with either the Scottish Parliament or Kirk.
opinion on new prayer book
- was supported by the Scottish Bishops, but resisted by many Presbyterians, who saw the new Prayer Book as a plot to introduce Anglicanism to Scotland
- 1637, unrest erupted throughout the Kirk upon the first Sunday of its usage, and the public began to mobilise around rebellious nobles in a National Covenant.
what happened in 1638 with the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland
abolished Episcopalian government (governance of the Church by bishops) , replacing it with Presbyterian government (governance by elders and deacons)