Religion as a force for change Flashcards
What are the 7 main factors that consider religion as a force for change?
1) Neo-Marxism
- Bloch, Gramsci, Maduro + liberation theology
2) Martin Luther King and Civil Rights USA
3) Hinduism and Indian Nationalism
4) Religious Fundamentalism
5) The origins of the Labour Party
6) Weber and the Protestant ethic
7) Maguire
Neo-Marxism
BLOCH
Religion as a dual character
+ recognises that having the idea of what a perfect world would look like, may help people in seeing what needs to be changed- gaining class consciousness, collaborates with politics and leadership = significant social change
- the masses internalise the belief that they will be rewarded for their suffering in heaven so they do not revolt on earth and the status quo continues
Neo-Marxism
GRAMSCI
- definitions
Humanist marxism
Hegemony- consenting to being led by capitalism
- benefit, choose to work for wages
Counter H- go against any type of capitalism
Agency: decision making autonomy
Neo-Marxism
GRAMSCI
Religion contributed to the hegemonic control of the RC
- X the only role, workers able to organise against the hegemony and develop counter H led by organic intellectuals
- charismatic leaders could take the role of organic intellectuals
What are organic intellectuals?
WC able to mobilise others to challenge oppression of capitalism
What are charismatic religious leaders?
Use their religious position/teachings to influence people
Neo-Marxism
MADURO + Liberation Theology
Challenge to traditional Marxism
- studied the idea that religion could bring about social change
What is liberation theology?
Justification for the liberation of oppressed people
- alternative to the standard view
- essential that the poor are ‘principle agents of their disimpoverishment’ - freedom
Why does liberation theology challenge traditional Marxist ideas about religion?
It states that they should aid the poor and bring social change to improve their economic status
- Marxism thinks the church want to maintain their wealth, not share it as they think it is stopping change
Who are 2 examples of liberation theologists?
1- Father Camilo Torres
2- Archbishop Romero
Who is Father Camilo Torres?
- led a revolution in Columbia
- killed fighting government forces
Who is Archbishop Romero?
Champion of social and economic reforms to improve the life of the poor
- shot dead in Cathedral by 4 gunmen
2) How does Martin Luther King highlight religion as a force for change?
Baptist paster- religious leader
- by not treating ‘all man’ equally, people were going against their faith, contradictory
- target values of faith, tradition of collectivity
- shot fighting for change
3) Hinduism and Indian nationalism
Hinduism- used as a powerful conservative force
- also inspired huge social change in the Indian nationalist movement
Caste system- can’t move up or down, destined, reinforces inequality
Ghandi- gain independence for India, fought against British rule, peaceful protests
Nanda
Hinduism argued to be a driving force for social change, as a key factor in India’s economic development
Nanda
Hinduism is closely related to Indian ‘ultra nationalism’
- 93% of Indians considered their culture ‘superior to others’
- Indian national identity and Hinduism are seen as effectively the same thing
- become what Bellah called a civil religion
- through the worship of Hindu gods, Indians are worshipping India itself
Why is ultranationalism more common amongst India’s educated middle class?
Due to India’s growing success
How does Nanda show religion as a force for change?
Growing economic success is the social change where affluent/educated MC are rewarded for their faith in hinduism
4) Religious fundamentalism
Can religion be a reaction against change?
What are the 4 characteristics of Fundamentalism?
1- An authoritarian sacred text (Christian fundamentalists see the bible as the literal truth)
2- As us and them mentality
3- The use of modern technology (the internet, televangelism, modern weaponry)
4- Patriarchal
What does Giddens argue about Fundamentalist movements?
That they are in direct contrast with cosmopolitanism which sees life as a personal choice rather than being dictated by religious authority
What are the 2 Fundamentalisms and what does Bruce say about them?
1- Islamic fundamentalism
2- Christian fundamentalism
B argues that while fundamentalists share the same characteristics, their origins may be different
Islamic Fundamentalism
Iran was a traditional society which quickly modernised and was influenced by the West under the Shah in the early 20th century
- women were able to wear western clothes, alcohol was freely available, secular education
- inequality between the rich and the poor