Relationships Flashcards
Griffit and Guay (1969)
PP’s were evaluated on a creative task by an experimenter and then asked to rate how much hey liked the experimenter. This rating was highest when the experimenter positively evaluated the PP’s performance on the task
Cate et al (1982)
PP’s asked to assess their current relationship in terms of reward level and satisfaction. It was found that reward level was superior to all other factors determining satisfaction
Hays (1985)
Found that we gain satisfaction from giving as well as receiving
Aron et al (2005)
Physiological support - Found that PP’s who measured high on self report qnnaire on romantic love also showed strong activity on particular areas of the brain. Early stage, intense romantic love was associated with elevated levels of activity in reward regions of the brain.
Lott (1994)
Cultural and gender bias - Found that in many cultures omen are more focused on the needs of others rather than receiving reinforcements from those they have romantic relationships with
Caspi and Herbener (1990)
Research conducted on real-life couples supports claims that have been previously demonstrated in lab studies which traditionally tested the model
Rosenbaum (1986)
Suggested dissimilarity is a more important factor in determining whether a relationship will form - Dissimilarity-repulsion hypothesis - tested in several cultures –> good ecological validity and culturally applicable
Rosenbaum (1986) - Findings
Found that PP’s were first attracted to eachother because of similarity of attitudes but as they got to know each other, those who discovered more dissimilarities than similarities became less attracted towards each other - model needs refining
Yoshida (1972)
Highlighted that the similarity model only takes into account personality and attitude - Other factors such as similarity of self-concept, economic level and physical condition are also important
Rusbult and Martz (1995)
They argue that when investments are high and alternatives are low this could still be argued as a profit situation –> can explain why women and men stay in abusive relationships
Simpson et al (1990)
Asked PP’s to rate members of the opposite sex in terms of their attractiveness. Those already in relationships gave lower ratings, suggesting that in order to deal with the potential alternatives they simple reduced threats
Social exchange theory - Cultural bias
The theory only looks at the idea that people are motivated to maintain relationships out of hedonistic reasons - only if we are encouraged to be independent - what about collectivist cultures
Demaris (2007)
Investigated whether marital equity is related to later marital disruption - greater under benefit increased the risk of divorce, especially women
Argyle (1998)
Gender bias - Women want equity more than men - over benefitted women were much less satisfied than those in equal relationships - Overbenefitted men almost as satisfied as those in equal relationships
Ragsdale and Brabdeau-Brown (2007)
Claim that equity theory is an insufficient theory to explain marital maintenance
Clark and Mills (1979)
Disagreed that all relationship are based on economics. There is a difference between exchange and communal relationships, which are more governed by the desire to respond to the needs of the partner
Boekhout et al (1999)
Demonstrated how marital affairs might be a direct reaction to a perceived lack of stimulation or skills
Boekhout et al (1999) - Findings
Undergraduates were asked to rate various sexual and emotional reasons for men and women to be unfaithful in a committed relationship. PP’s that men would most likely use sexual reasons such as sexual excitement/boredom whereas emotional reason such as lack of attention/commitment would used by women
Rohlfing (1995)
Found that 70% of students sampled had experienced at least one long-distance romantic relationship
Holt and Stone (1988)
Found that there was little decrease in relationship satisfaction as long as lovers are able to reunite regularly
Brehm and Kassin (1996)
Women are more likely to stress unhappiness and incompatibility as reasons for dissolution whereas men are particularly upset with ‘sexual witholding’
Gina et al (2003)
Compared 50 couples (avg. relationship length = 12 years) who received CCET group reported with a control group who did not. CCET group reported higher levels of marital satisfaction than the control group
Tashiro and Frazier (2003)
Found that undergrads who had experienced a recent breakup reported that they had experienced emotional distress but also insights into themselves and a clearer idea about future partners
What Tashiro and Frazier support?
Grave-dressing and resurrection processes
Akert
There is a variation in the psychological reactions of the break-up where the person who initiated the break-up experiences less negative symptoms
Problems with research into relationship breakdown
- -> Gender bias: Ignores differences in the way men and women cope with the breakdown of a relationships
- -> Reductionism: Reduces breakdown to stages
- -> Methodology: Qnnaires = investigator bias present in their interpretation
- -> Ethical issues: Can be a sensitive area and raises the issue of vulnerability, privacy and confidentiality
Perilloux and Buss (2008) - Method
- -> 98 male and 101 females from US uni’s who had all experienced break-ups
- -> All were heterosexual
- -> 80% had experienced breakup as a rejector and 71% as a rejectee
- -> PP’s did either an online qnnaire or a qnnaire in a psychology office
Perilloux and Buss (2008) - Findings
1) Females reported higher levels of cost associated with losing their partners emotional commitment
2) Males reported success at preventing a breakup by increasing their ;even of commitment
3) Male rejectors reported in engaging in sex with other potential mates prior to the breakup
4) Rejectors indicated a higher cost of being seen as cruel and heartless compared to rejectees