Regionalism and the EU Flashcards
First regional intergovernmental organisation
Danube Commission in 1856 between states on the Danube, ensured protection of the river’s uses, reflects the most obvious reason for regionalism as shared environment.
Definition of regionalism
Institutions that express a particular identity and shape collective action within a geographical region.
Economic regionalism
Focuses on financial and trade aspects, trade blocs, vast majority of states belong to a regional trade bloc.
Security regionalism
Achieving peace and security, either through interconnectedness which makes war impossible, or binding against a common enemy e.g. ASEAN originally against communism in SE Asia.
Political regionalism
States seek to protect their shared values and enhance voice in the world, AU and Arab League founded in this.
Europe’s post war regionalism
First region to undergo move to co-operation, resolution that Europe should never go to war again after twentieth century, people like Jean Monnet thought war could be made impossible through interconnectedness, triggered the Coal and Steel Community in 1951 as these materials necessary for war were now not under state control.
Regionalisms affect on globalisation
Heightens globalisation, increase of regional trade directly boosts economic globalisation, political globalisation and regionalism essentially the same thing, governance to solve mutual problems.
Opinions of globalisation sceptics on regionalism
On one hand regional organisation defend against globalisation by pooling their sovereignty, whereas some also criticise regionalism seeing the impact on communities and jobs by increasing ease of trade.
How is democracy undermined by regionalism
Supranational of intergovernmental bodies that make binding decisions that lack accountability, e.g. the EU allowing freedom of movement, around 750 000 Polish people have moved to the UK in recent years, but public have no say on this, led to Brexit, in US NAFTA perceived as outsourcing jobs to Mexico and blamed for industry closures.
Benefit of corporations from regionalism
Above ordinary producers, trade increases it benefits TNCs over local or national producers, feeds into cultural homogenisation, states cannot protect own industries because terms of regional bodies tend to prevent this. Despite the level playing field argument, EU states don’t currently have same corporation tax which is as high as 33% in France and 10% in Bulgaria, Ireland has secured Apple investment despite other strict laws due to low tax rates at 12.5%.
How can regionalism challenge TNCs
Since TNCs have more wealth than states like Apple $200b in cash reserves, more than the GDP of Morocco, generally try to seek out low labour costs and with lower tax regulations, and because states want TNC investment this can trigger a race to the bottom, regional bodies (esp. EU) prevent states undercutting one another and level playing field.
Pooled voice in trade negotiations example
When negotiating the TTIP in 2016, differences like EU not allowing hormones in it’s meat, EU sought protection for geographically protected names like ‘Champagne’ and protection of the french-language film industry, as individual deal the terms would not have been as favourable to the much weaker EU states.
Arguments for more regionalism
- Almost all states in regional trade block and lots want to join EU, must be for a reason
- ASEAN is continuing to integrate in other areas than economics
- Arab league has been defending Syria in civil war
- Even with Brexit there will still be enhanced trade with EU
- Issues like climate change and conflict have not gone away
- Revival of fears in Europe of security especially along Russian border
- What alternatives are there?
Arguments for less regionalism
- Brexit
- ASEAN is not bold and disagreements e.g. over human rights in the organisation
- Arab league has achieved little in Syria
- Significant opposition in US to NAFTA and other regional trade, support for Trump and Sanders in the election
- Democratic support for ‘taking control’
- Seems to benefit the big corporations, strong reaction against
- Co-operation is necessary but does not have to be in such formal structures.
Impact of regionalism on legal sovereignty
States can leave, no compulsion to stay so states are free to follow own interests.
Impact of regionalism on political or state sovereignty
May be seen to have surrendered sovereignty as have to co-operate on decisions, whereas some may feel they have increased it by pooling sovereignty.
Impact of regionalism on internal sovereignty
States are legally sovereign in own territory but regional organisations sometimes restrict law making powers e.g. EU law is higher law for member states and can overrule internal national legislation, states cannot control immigration from other states.
Development of NAFTA
Founded in 1992 between the three states, free-trade to improve prosperity for them, is no longer NAFTA as was rewritten under Trump who called in ‘worst trade deal ever’ due to loss of jobs, now the USMCA resigned 2018, world’s largest free trade zone.
Development of the AU
Founded 1999, 54 member states, establish integration between African states, rid continent of colonisation and apartheid, promote unity, safeguard territorial integrity, promote international co-operation, has been taking an increasingly economic role with free-trade area, Africa-China trade 4x US-China trade, growing global voice e.g. invited to G7 summit last year.
Development of the Arab League
Founded in 1945 with middle eastern and north african states, to encourage and protect common interests, now has 22 members but faces divisions e.g. over the Syrian civil war, significant security role in protecting sovereignty, plans for multilateralism as has had summits with the EU.
Development of ASEAN
Founded 1967, now has 10 members including Indonesia, Thailand etc. to encourage development and promote peace, as well as ensure adherence to principles of the UN charter, in 2016 as a group the 6th largest economy in the world, security concerns due to threat of China in the South China Sea.
Timeline of European integration
1951 ECSC formed with 6 members to create a ‘supranational’ institution to control material needed for rearmament
1957 Through Treaty of Rome they set up a common market now EEC
1973 Denmark Ireland and the UK join the EEC in first widening
1986 Creation of the single market and passing of more powers
1993 Maastricht Treaty completes the single market, ‘four freedoms’ and creates the EU
1995 Schengen Area is epablished
2002 12 states began using the Euro
2004 Attempts to introduce a European Constitution but rejection by French and Dutch voters so scraped.