Power and developments Flashcards
Different types of power
Hard, soft and smart
Military hard power
The stick, ability to coerce or make others do something, military: ability of state to commit aggressive act against another, eg China building military power, has largest number of active personnel at over 2 million, Russian aggression in Ukraine, Iraq war fought for US foreign policy reasons.
Economic hard power
The carrot, incentives for states to comply to another, like sanctions, trade barriers and restrictions, or trade agreements as rewards, eg sanctions against South Africa due to apartheid, including protection of workers rights in trade agreements, sanctions against Russia over 16 500 since start of war.
Effectiveness of hard power
Limited eg China hasn’t been able to assert dominance in South China Sea, sanctions have been largely unsuccessful against Russia due to cooperation elsewhere like BRICS. Consequences of hard power eg fallout in Iraq, and the emergence of black majority rule in South Africa could be attributed to sanctions. Double standards especially in economics as western states will often turn a blind eye to trading partners eg no action against China’s human rights record.
The UKs soft power
English most common second-language in world, remnants of British imperialism and global US influence, leading role in IGOs like forming the Council of Europe.
The EUs soft power
Economic power in creation of the single market, free movement means an attractive market place, eg expansion in 2004, role of high representative gives it voice in foreign policy, involved in 30 missions since 2003 for security, humanitarian aid etc, key role in negotiations with Iran for nuclear disarmament.
Smart power
Combination of hard and soft, Joseph Nye coined term in 2004, inspired by Clinton’s presidency, argued most effective is smart power, used example of dealing with Taliban in Afghanistan, hard power needed but without soft would have alienated other Muslim states.
Places states can derive power
Capabilities: such as population, wealth, military, natural resources etc.
Relationships: known as relational power, making rights alliances
Structures: control of knowledge, finances, security and global production, USA leading power in number of IGOs.
Great powers
Term originates from early 19th century, Kenneth Waltz’s criteria:
- population
- resources
- economic development
- political stability
- military strength
additionally ability to project power, Britain a key great power, by 1922 British Empire ruled around 1/5 of global population, challenged by Germany due to rapid industrialisation, US rising but Monroe Doctrine stop US involvement in Europe until WW2.
Superpowers
Term emerged post WW2 to describe US and USSR, distinguished by mobility of power, both had blocs which they dominated through NATO and Warsaw Pact, US involvement in Korean and Vietnamese wars as well as sponsoring right-wing activities in the rest of the Americas, supporting Israel as counter-weight to Soviet supported states in middle east, transformed into superpowers by development of nuclear weaponry.
Emerging powers
Only recent usage of term, mostly associated with growing economy, largely caused by widening trade due to globalisation, G20 seen as important global forum for emerging powers to exert influence, as well as BRICS.
Define polarity
Description of power and authority among states, nature of the international system and how power is distributed.
Implications of unipolarity
Where there are no constraints to global hegemonic power, realists see as natural result of power seeking states as only way to protect own state is to become the hegemon, can be positive as hegemon acts as ‘global police force’ intervening in conflict and enforcing human rights, can ensure economic stability, this associated with phases of ‘Pax Britannicus’ and ‘Pax Americana’, however liberals fear predatory hegemon where other states led into security dilemma, therefore leading to more conflict.
Implications of bipolarity
Power around two major states or blocs where near balance of power between the two, for realists is most natural state, as states less likely to seek power for fear of challenge so equilibrium is reached leading to relative security, however others would argue that preemptive arms races to prevent other becoming the hegemon lead to more insecurity, many see cold war as best bipolarity but during cold war there were violent interactions in proxy wars such as Korea or Vietnam, in the end Soviet economy could not compete with the US, ended because of Gorbachev’s principles of Perestroika = relaxation of the economy and Glasnost = political transparency.
Implications of multipolarity
Three or more power centres, neo-realists argue it is inherently unstable and is anarchical polarity where small power changes could lead to conflict, liberals optimistic, believe multilateralism and cooperation, is interdependent polarity.
Two major obstacles to peace and security
How the UN should be strengthened without threatening state sovereignty, reform has proved impossible due to gridlock from veto,
How to promote peace between USA and Russia