Reg of the Legal Profession Flashcards
<p>Should you guess on the MPRE?</p>
<p>Yes- no penalty for wrong guesses</p>
<p>Who is the main regulator of judicial conduct?</p>
<p>State's highest court (which then delegates to disciplinary commission or bar association)</p>
<p>What is the Supreme Court's standard for evaluating a state's requirements for admission to the bar?</p>
<p>The requirement must be "rationally related to the practice of law"</p>
<p>If there is a question on character and fitness, an applicant may be asked to appear before a hearing committe.</p>
<p>Who has the burden of proof for proving the "good moral character" required by the character and fitness portion of the bar application?</p>
<p>What duties does the applicant owe to the committee?</p>
<p>The applicant.</p>
<p>Owes duty to cooperate in reasonably investigations by the state bar and make disclosures relevant to his fitness to practice law</p>
<p>What kinds of misconduct/crimes can result in rejection of a bar application?</p>
<p>Conviction of any crime is not sufficient.</p>
<p>Misconduct involving "Moral turpitude" (ie dishonesty for personal gain, violence) is required. Nature of offense and motivation are considered. Adolescent misbehavior (e.g. fistfight) or civil disobedience are not moral terpitude</p>
<p>Lying on the bar application itself is an act of moral turpitude</p>
<p>What are two requirements that are not rationally related to the practice of law (and so cannot be asked on a bar application)?</p>
<p>Citizenship and residency</p>
Asking for these violates the equal protection and privileges and immunities clauses (respectively)
<p>Who is bound by the duty to comply with character investigations for a bar application? What is required by the duty?</p>
<p>The applicant and any of the attorney in connection with the applicat's application MUST NOT:</p>
<p>1) <strong>fail to disclose</strong> a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension <strong>known</strong> by the person to have arisen in the matter</p>
<p>2)<strong>knowingly fail to respond</strong> to a lawful demand for information</p>
<p>and of course,No KNOWINGLY false statements of material fact</p>
<p>B knows A lied on bar app. Does B have to report?</p>
<p>Yes</p>
<p>What constitutes professional misconduct?</p>
<p>violating the RPC, attempting to violate the RPC, assisting or inducing someone else to violate the RPC, using the acts of another personto violate the RPC</p>
<p>What kind of crimes subject a lawyer to discipline?</p>
Crimes involving honesty, interference with justice, violence, or fitness to practice law EVEN IF NOT CONVICTED.
The crime does not have to arise out of the practice of law, but is must reflect on some personal quality necessary to practice law in order to support professional discipline. (e.g. single instance of marijuana, soliciting prostitute, dwi don’t count)
<p>What kinds of acts subject a lawyer to discipline even if unrelated to their law practice?</p>
<p>Acts of dishonesty, fraud deceit, or misrepresentation</p>
<p>What is the catchall category that subjects a lawyer to discipline?</p>
<p>Conduct prejudicial to the administration of judtice</p>
<p>Can a lawyer harass or discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, or socioeconomic status?</p>
<p>Cannot harass/disciminate on those basis IN THEIR LAW PRACTICE (but can outside of their practice)
Does not affect ability to accept/decline/withdraw from a case, limit practice to only underserved populations, promote diversity. Use of preemptory strikes in a discriminatory way alone is not enough.</p>
<p>When does another lawyer HAVE TO report a violation?</p>
<p>If the lawyer KNOWS of a RPC violation that raises SUBSTANTIAL doubt as to the honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to practice</p>
<p>When is another lawyer PERMITTED to report a violation?</p>
The violation does NOT raise a SUBSTANTIAL question as to honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness
OR
The violation is SUSPECTED but not known
<p>What are two key exceptions to the mandatory reporting requirement?</p>
1) Reporting would violate a duty of confidentiality
2) Learned of the violation in a lawyer’s assistance program
<p>Where is a lawyer subject to regulation?</p>
<p>Subject to regulation in each state in which the lawyer is admitted to practice (REGARDLESS where the lawyer ACTUALLY practices or where the conduct occurred)</p>
<p>Choice of law agreements are permitted for which area of RPC?</p>
<p>Conflicts of interest only</p>
<p>Who is subject to discipline for practicing law without a license?</p>
<p>The person without the license and anyone assisting them in the unauthorized practice of law</p>
<p>What are categories of activities considered practicing law?</p>
- appearing at proceedings
- drafting documents that affect substantial legal rights (but non-attorneys can take the first draft if reviewed by atty)
- negotiating settlements
- giving legal advice
- divorce
<p>What are three categories of activities that are not the practice of law?</p>
- non lawyers (e.g. accountants) may appear in court of federal agencies representing clients sometimes
- interviewing people
- filling in forms for documents (real estate brokers, title insurance cos, escrow cos can fill out forms to sell real estate)
- preparing tax returns (not advice on tax law)
- publish books/pamphlets with general advice including do-it-yourself books/kits
<p>What are the methods of temporary out of state practice?</p>
APAMR
- Associate with local atty that ACTIVELY PARTICIPATES in the matter. (Get Client consent)
- admission Pro hac vice (or reasonably expect to be admitted pro has vice)
- Arbitration or Mediation
- matter reasonably Related to home state practice
^These methods also work for foreign lawyers
<p>What are the two methods for permanently practicing in a state you are not licensed in?</p>
- In house counsel (but not litigation) and govt lawyers in not litigation practices. to litigate must seek pro hac vice
- Lawyers in certain restricted fields like patent prosecution as authorized by federal or local law that authorizes a lawyer to to practice a restricted branch of law in a state in which he is not otherwise admitted to practice
<p>What are the three theoretical factors to determine practicing law?</p>
1) Whether the activity involves legal knowledge and skill beyond that of an average lay person
2) Whether the activity is advice or services concerning binding legal rights/remedies
3) Whether the activity is traditionally performed by lawyers
<p>What are the two kinds of responsibilities that partners, managers and supervising attorneys have?</p>
(Remember, you don’t have to be a partner to be a supervising attorney, but all partners are held to the standard of a supervising attorney)
1) Duty to prevent (REASONABLE EFFORTS to ensure compliance with the RPC. reasonable is a function of the size of the firm)
2) Vicarious responsibility
a - ORDERED or KNEW ABOUT AND RATIFIED the misconduct OR
b- knows of misconduct when it could have been mitigated and fails to take reasonable remedial action
<p>Are subordinate lawyers responsible for violations of the RPC if they were advised to do it?</p>
<p>Yes, unless the action was a reasonable resolution of a n arguable question of professional duty.</p>
What are the three pillars of independence from non-lawyers?
1) No partnerships with non-lawyers if any of the partnership activities involve the practice of law
2) No non-lawyer control or ownership interest in the firm (other that the estate of a recently deceased partner)
3) No fee splitting with non-lawyers (with limited exceptions)
<p>What are the exceptions to splitting fees with a non-lawyer?</p>
1) Death benefits to the lawyer’s estate
2) Payments to purchase practice from dead/disappeared/disabled lawyer’s representative
3) Bonus plans and regular salaries (but can’t share % of fees tied to an individual case with a non-lawyer)
4) Court awarded legal fees to non-profit that retained or recommended the lawyer
What is the only circumstance where a law firm can restrict a lawyer’s ability to practice?
What is the consequence if lawyers offer or accept a disallowed restriction?
Retirement benefit agreements
Offering or agreeing to a disallowed restriction will subject a lawyer to discipline because it not only limits the lawyer’s ability to practice. It limits the ability of clients to choose a lawyer
I’m selling a law practice. What do I need to do?
0) Exercise competence in identifying a purchaser qualified to assume the practice
1) Sell the whole thing or an entire practice group (not pieces or cases)
2) Written notice to clients that includes notice of sale, right to obtain other counsel or take files, fact that consent to transfer to buyer is presumed after 90 days. If notice cannot be given then a court order is required to transfer the representation to the purchaser
3) Cannot continue private practice in the area where the practice has been conducted if entire practice was sold (or practice in the practice area that was sold in the area where the practice was conducted)
I’m buying a legal practice. What do I need to do?
Honor the existing fee arrangements (can’t raise fees) and not pick and choose clients. (Compliance with conflicts rules is the only excuse to pick and choose)
When does the RPC apply to non-legal services provided by lawyers?
1) BUNDLES: When the services are sold separately from the legal services (ie sold as a bundle) then RPC applies to the bundle.
2) If lawyer owns or controls an entity (even if separate from the law firm entity) that provides non-legal services and does not take reasonable steps to ensure recipients know atty-client protections don’t apply, then the RPC applies to all activities.
<p>Where do courts get their power to regulate the legal profession</p>
<p>The power is inherent since the practice of law is intimately connected with the administration of justice</p>
<p>What is the rulebook called?</p>
<p>the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct</p>