redman nmr Flashcards
when assigning peaks in nmr,, what. should we look at the molecule for
we should see if there are any resonance forms of itttt.
aka if theres double bonds, carbonyls, edg or ewg with lone pairs etc
what alters a groups chem shift
its proximity to a fg
resonance structures
how does resonance affect ppm
when we draw resonance theres normally a redistribution of e- density.
they place the e- came from will normally be (+) ,, means its less shielded and will have a higher chem shift
okay so if we have butanal with a double bond between 2and 3 ,, what will be seen in spec
we should identify that resonance can occur and draw out the structures!!
we should then see which carbonds are most deshielded and will have a higehr chem shift.
this is normally the carbons bonded to the ewg (no2, cor) and thennnnn the carbon that is (+) due to resonance.
then u look at the other carbonds and their proximity to the fg (the closer they are = the larger the effect of the fg on it)
okay so resonance and substituted benzene
the ortho position is unpredictable bc resonance occurs on it,, but its also very close to the substituent so other factors effect its chem shift
meta: no resonance so it has the same chem shift as unsubstituted benzene
para: this is the special position!!!! this is always affected by resonance!! edg = more shielded,, lower ppm ,,, ewg = deshielded = larger ppm
para posoition and ewg
(+) : deshielded = larger ppm than unsubstituted benzene values
para position and edg
(-) = more shielded = smaller ppm value than unsubstituted benzene.
diff forms of coupling
scalar dipolar
scalar coupling
between bonds
bc e- also have a magnetic field
dipolar coupling
between space
they dont need to be connected via bond
doesnt rlly matter for in solution nmr
when is coupling to d observed
when u use deuterated solvent : so basically for everything
d i value =
1
why would u switch h for d
bc in methane: u cant calculate the coupling between the h’s bc. its not oberserved bc theyre said rto be in the same env.
if u switch some for d,, there will be coupling
J.HD /J.HH = yd / yh
yd/yh = look up
J.HD = can find using spec
use this to find J.HH
what is gyromagnetic constant ,, y
constant that shows the strength of the magnetic field of the nucleus
the number to the lhs of J is what
the number of bonds between the 2 things that are coupling
what effects J
- distance // number of bonds
- gyromagnetic constant
- hybridisation
- bond angles (orbital overlap is effected)
- electronegativity
J value is Hz can beeee
positive or negative values
Hz of 1J
280Hz
very large bc close proximity
2J Hz between a carbonyl
0 - 3 Hz
2J geminal (attached to the same C)
-20 — 5 Hz
3J vicinal (on adjacent C’s with a good bond rotation between them)
2 – 12Hz or 7Hz
3J trans alkene
12 – 18 Hz
3J cis alkene
7 - 12Hz
how can we find out if smt is a cis or trans alkene
we look at the coupling constant value,,,
7–12Hz = cis
12 - 18 Hz = trans
is 4J ever seen ??
yes girllll
4 j can be seen when theres pi bonding (double bonds) in alkenes or benzene
or in rigid structures where the 2Hs coupled via 4J are in a W position,, aka in cyclohexane or when there are 2 cyclic structures fused together
why is 4J normally not seen and why can it sometimes be seen in structures with pi bonding or W geometry
4J normally has such a small Hz coupling constant that the peaks merge together and are seen as one peak.
however,, in structures with pi bonding or W geometries,, the coupling constant values in Hz is larger than usual,, so the peaks can be resolved to see 2 peaks!!!
so can coupling between 2H’s on benzene (1,3 subs) be seen
yessss
bc its got pi bonding so the 4J coupling constant in Hz is larger thsn usual,, allowing us to resolve the 2 different peaks
what should we thino of when wer talking about 4J and Hz and peaks being resolved etccc
we should think of the splitting diagram tree!!!
and how the different peaksks in the tree are separated with a certain J Hz value.
whats roofing
when the intensity of the peaks doesnt match what we think we should get based on pascals triangle
its when u can draw a roof above the peaks on a spectra
4J allene Hz value
6hz
4J trans alkene hz
-2Hz
1-3 benzene subs with Hs’ 4J hz
2Hz
cyclohexane chair W geometry 4J hz value
2Hz
2 cyclic structures fused 4J hz value
7hz
normally when we do 13C nmr,, what do we do
we run it on proton decoupled mode so u dont see coupling to H ,,, only D from the solvent
or singlets most of the time
values of J. CH coupling : 1J sp3
125 hz (more p character = nose in the middle of p orbital : scalar coupling depends is via e- in bonds so if theres less e-,,, less hz
values of 1JCH sp2
155Hz
more s character bc less p character
values of 1J CH sp
250hz
lots of s character which has no nodes so lots of e-!!!
2J and 3J
-4 - 6 hz
when we say bond angle affects J value,, what do we means by bond angle
we mean the torsion angle,, aka we should think of a newman projection
eclipsed groups = 0 torsion angle
antconformation = 180 angle
eclipsed Jhh torsion angle and J value in hz
torsion angle = 0
12Hz
90* torsion angle in newman projection J value in hz
0 Hz
anti conformation, torsion angle and J value in hz
torsion angle = 180
14Hz
all the torsion angles and theyre effcect on J is wjatttt
its averaged out lowkey,, bc the bond is spinning freely most of the time so the groups keep rotationg so theyre always a mix of all the torsion angles
it gets averaged out to about 7Hz
what is the karplus relationship
we can find torsial angles based on J hz values!!! when a molecules rotation is hindered ( pi bonding or cyclic structures)
karplus relationship : cyclohexane: axial axial coupling in hz
180* angle
larger J or 8-13Hz
karplus relationship
cyclohexane: equitorial equitorial // equitorial axial ,, angle j value in Hz
60*
small J 2-5Hz
how can the karplus relationship be used
okay so we can lowkey find out if we have a a cis or trans cyclohexane!!
we do this by looking at the H attached to the same C as one of the substituents.
we look on the spec and we see that different peaks have different splitting J values.
we draw the 2 possible cis and trans structures and the H.
if the H is axial,, u get a a mix of small Js for the equitorial groups but u also get large J’s due to aial axial interactions!!!
if the H is equitorial,, u only get small J values bc theres no 180* interaction bc its equitorial. so. the peak with small J hz will be this one.
then u find the integration for each peak (this tells u how many H’s (aka molecules) correspond to abs of that ppm)
% of cis isomer =
integration of cis / total integration x 100
% of trans isomer =
integration of trans isomer / total integration x 100
whats second order coupling
when things coupling to eachother have very similar chemical shifts (like in this lecture when we keep moving the chem shift difference closer and closer until the chem shift difference is 0 and a singlet is visible)
so theres no observed coupling between the 2 groups,, but they are still coupled.
this gives peaks that have roofing ,, and stuff that look like a quartet when its acc a 2 doublets with roofing
aka complex splitting patters
how do we know if we’re going to get a complex splitting pattern
look if the molecule has any magnetic inequivalence (alkenes or benzene usuallyyyy) other structures too probs
what leads to second order effects in spec
multiplets caused by magnetic inequivalence
when do we see a nice doublet
if the chem shift difference between 2 different peaks IN HZ is much larger than J
if we decrease the chem shift value between 2 different peaks,, and reduce the chem shift difference,, what happens
the change in chem shift value is reduced,, its closer to the J value in Hz.
roofing occurs
where the inner peaks are larger in intensity,, and the end peaks reduce in intensity
if we have a doublet,, then roofing occurs where the outer peak is reduced in intensity,, what happens to the chem shift value
the chem shift value shifts towards the line with the higher intensity and awak from the centre
the centre being the centre when the 2 peaks were of the same intensity
when they have different intensities,, the chem shift goes closer to the more intense peak.
can roofing be helpful
yes,, if we draw the roofs,, we can find out what peaks are coupled in spec.
how to find normal chem shift values
u add the 2 ppm values of the peaks and divide by 2
how to find the chem shift values when u have roofing
(v x i) ( v x i) // i + i
where v = freq = ppm
i = intensity
u do this but obvs for each peak. to get the averaged chem shift when intensity differes and chem shift shifts towards the peak with higher intensity.
ppm =
ppm = Hz/MHz
when do we see roofing
when change in chem shift is similar to J
we dont see roofing when change in chem shift in Hz is up to x10 larger than J.
imagine 2 doublets
change in chem shift is from one of their chem shifts to another. J is the gap between the 2 dohblet peaks of 1 doublet.
the smaller u make change in chem shift what happens
the more u change in intensity of the lines
the more intense roofing u get
bc the closer lines are getting more intense,, and the shorter lines are getting less intense. the chem shift values are also being altered.
how can we tell if smt is rlly a quartet,, quintet etc and not just second order coupling
u measure the distance between the peaks
aka all the J values of the observed // apparent quartet.
if theyre all equal then they are a quartet
if theyre not then its not a quartet girl - its a second order coupling // second order coupling.
2 ways we can tell if smt is acc a quartet or a second order coupling this
- check the J values between all the peaks,, if theyre equal then its a quartet,, if not them its a second order coupling thing
- also chem=ck if the intensities match the theoretical intensities, aka if its a quartet,, do the ‘quartet’ peaks have a 1:3:3:1 ratio
okay what if we go crazy and we make the chem shift difference value 0 🫢
the 2 peaks will become one!! bc they both have the same chem shift,, meaning theyre both on the same ppm!!!
it looks like a singlet bc the outer peaks now have an intensity of 0,, it makes it look as if theres no coupling but there acc is,, theres just no observable coupling,, bc it looks like a singlet 2ni+1.
if second order coupling occurs,, what happens and why is this a problem and how can we resolve
- the different peaks have the same // similar chem shift values which makes it hard to find the coupling patters as u get weird multiplets that overlap instead of nice peaks.
- we can resolve this,, as we learnt in the previous lecture,, to switch one of the atoms in the molecule for D,, which will couple to the H’s // other atoms, then we can use the JHD value and the magneticgyro constant ratio of H and D to find the JHH value!!
JHH = JHD x hyromagnetic constant value. this is kinda long tho bc u need to add a D in a very specific specific place which is lowkey tricky
or we can make use of 13C,, which is nmr active,, so the H’s will couple to themselves ,, and the 13C (the 13C peaks will be much smaller tho!!! bc their abundance is so low)
what effects how spec is observed and describe everything about it
the magnetic field strength of the spectrum!!
when we have a spec with a higher magnetic field strength,,, aka 500MHz vc 200MHz the roofing and second order effects are minimised,, due to the chem shift difference between 2 peaks being much much larger than the J value.
more ‘predictable peaks’ from tree diagrams are observed rather than the second order peaks.
find J in Hz
find chem shift diff in hz
see what number must be multipied to get them both
then u see that the chem shift difference = XJ Hz
where x is the number than links the chem shift and J
how does a larger MHz effect spectra and peaks
less second order effects as chem shift difference,, delta delta,, is increased
and the peaks of the doublet get closer together.
how can we check for magnetic // chemical inequivalence
chemical - yk this girl, u can litch just do this via observation
magnetic: do the 2 things have the same J values to the same things. to check : draw a newman projection,,, 180* torsial angle = larger J value,,, 60* = smaller J value,, so they wouldnt have the same J values for the same atom,, so theyre not magnetically equivalent. remmeber to pick one group and compare the 2 things to the one u picked.
they could have the same nJ value,, but diff acc J values in Hz.
magnetic inequivalence normally leads to whattttt
it leads to multipletsssss!!!
weird looking peak,, dont even try to draw the tree diagram just write ‘m’
when is magnetic inequivalence present
CH2 CH2 molecules!!
aromatic molecules (1-4 substituted ones esp)