Reasoning Flashcards
Definition of reasoning
Thinking process invoved in the generation and/or evaluation of inferences (known also as arguments)
Definition of inference
Finite n of statements, the last of which (conclusion) is related to the premesis (assumed to be true)
Inferential indicators
Specific words or expressions that indicate the presence of an argument
Premise indicators
Since- For- Because- given that- for the reason that
Conclusion indicators
Therefore-Thus-Then-Hence-So-For this reason
What are premises and conclusions?
They are propositions/statements i.e. declarative sentences affirmative of certain facts
What is a declarative sentence?
Minimal unit of language that can be associated a truth value
Non-contradition principle
Premises and conclusions are either true or false and cannot be both
Principle of excluded middle
Any proposition is either true or its negation is, there is no other possibility
Deductive arguments
- The truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion
- Make explicit concluions which are already implicit in the premises –> the conclusion doesn’t add new info (TRIVIALITY)
Inductive arguments
- The truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion
- The premises may affect the credibility of the conclusion but do not necessarily imply it
Forms of inductive arguments
- DESCRIPTIVE: They identify regularities and are mainly used to generalize data
- EXPLANATORY: They represent real explanations (not necessarily scientific)
Validity of inductive arguments
Inductive arguments are not valid can be MORE OR LESS STRONG
Argument validity
Aguments can be:
- Deductively valid
- deductively invalid
Soundness
An argument is sound if and only if it is valid and all its premises are true. Sound arguments have true conclusions
Tautology
compound statement that is always true, regardless of the truth values assigned to its component atomic statements
Contradiction
Compound statement that is always false, regardless of the truth values assigned to its component atomic statements
Strength of a statement
Determined by what the statements say i.e., the more it says the stronger it is
→ It is inversely related to its a priori probability
→ contradictions are the strongest stamentents while tautologies are the weakest
Conditional Syllogisms
Are arguments in which one premise (major premise) is a conditional statement (P–>Q), while the other (minor premise) is one of the two atomic propositions that appear in the conditional statement, either in the affirmative or negative form
How many combinations of the premises there are?
4
Denying the antecedent fallacy/Fallacy of the inverse
P→ Q
¬P
———-
¬Q INVALID
AFFIRMING THE CONSEQUENT FALLACY/FALLACY OF THE CONVERSE)
P → Q
Q
——–
P INVALID
MODUS PONENS
P → Q
P
——-
Q VALID
MODUS TOLLENS
P → Q
¬Q
——–
¬P VALID
Abductions
sub category of inductive arguments.
Symptoms and conclusions