Realism and crime Flashcards
what do left and right realists agree on
- crime is a real problem to be tackled
- other theories give unrealistic solutions to crime
- concerned with wide spread fear of crime and the impact of crime on victims
what do right realists think
they share the new right or neo-conservative view and support the police
what do left realists think
they’re socialists and favour different policies for reducing crime
right realist key assumptions
originated in 1970s by James Q. Wilson and Ernst van den Haag
crime is a growing issue that undermines social cohesion and destroys social communities
negative view of human nature ( people are selfish and greedy)
this aspect of human nature needs to be subject to social controls and socialised into appropriate behaviour
explain right realist: causes of crime
- individual biological differences
- underclass theory (inadequate socialisation)
- rational choice theory
biological differences as a cause of crime
people are born with a predisposition towards crime, without proper socialisation they will be criminals
see low intelligence as the main cause
they recognise choice and free will
bio differences: A02 case study
Brunner et al. (1993) studied families in the Netherlands that committed crimes like rape, exhibitionism or arson
researchers found men had a genetic condition called ‘Brunner syndrome’ which caused low IQ (families had average IQ:85) and high aggression
suggests we can inherit conditions making us prone to crime
underclass theory as a cause of crime
Murray and Marsland say crime is committed by highly deviant, immoral, work-shy subculture called the underclass»_space; made up of problem families in council estates who socialise the next gen into crime
families are headed by single mothers and kids lack a stable father
new right think rise in underclass is due to welfare or state
Murray thinks lone mothers are ineffective socialisation agents
rational choice theory as a cause of crime
Cornish and Clarke (1986) say criminal have free will and choose to commit crime
crime is due to weighing up costs and benefits
benefit: money, revenge, thrill, status
costs: prison, fine, re-offending, exclusion
rational choice theory > reason for increased crime
Felson argues crime increased because:
-quality of policing has deteriorated
-punishments are too lenient
-community controls are weak (people are scared to report crime)
Hirschi’s control theory: factors that deter people from crime
- attachment > fear losing love from family
- commitment > fear losing job, house and standard of living
- involvement > fear losing positive reputation and respect from friends, colleagues and community
- belief > most people have been successfully socialised into respecting others and following the law
control theory application
underclass and young are less likely to have 4 controls so are more likely to commit crime
A03 right realist explanation of crime
biological differences > conflicting explanation as it states we are free agents but are also predisposed to crime
Lilly et al (2002) found IQ differences account for less than 3% of differences in offending
rational choice theory > postmodernists say crime is not rational and is irrational and spontaneous ( eg a drunken fight is not rational)
underclass theory > only explains utilitarian crime and not impulsive or violent crime
Hirschi’s control theory > ignores wide structural causes such as poverty
state 3 right realist strategies to tackling crime
target hardening
surveillance
neighbourhood watch schemes
explain broken windows theory
Wilson: minor signs of neglect lead to disorder
people know the community is not taken care of
fixing them will reduce crime