Reading, Writing, Spelling Flashcards

1
Q

Information processing

Reading

A

Print - Speech

Print - Meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Information Processing

Spelling

A

Speech - Print

Meaning - Print

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reading, writing and spelling

A

➢Secondary language skills
➢Build on speaking & listening
➢Need instruction & oral language skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reading comprehension relies on

A

Vocabulary
Reading skill
Phonological skill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reading comprehension and accuracy

A

Positively correlated in early reading acquisition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Automatic reading gives resources to comprehension

3

A
  • Vocabulary breadth & depth
  • Morphology eg. Plays playing
  • Syntax
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Building more vocabulary builds up

A

How good you are at reading, how much you enjoy reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Equation

A

Reading = Decoding x Comprehension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Development
A)
B)

A

A) Word reading = word recognition and decoding

B) word reading = recognition, decoding and vocabulary for meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How do we read?

Strategies (5)

A
➢Recognise Letters (memory)
➢Decode Sounds (grapheme-phoneme)
➢Analogise to known words
➢Predict words from grapho-phonemic context
➢Memory & Semantic Context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Words that look similar and learn from them is called

A

Analogise to known words strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Starting to build up networks in brain is called

A

Memory and semantic context strategy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Phonological Awareness is

A

Awareness of sounds in words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Examples of phonological Awareness

A

Pen Pipe

Is there a /n/ sound?
Do they begin the same?
Do they rhyme with “Ten”?
What is the first sound
What / how many sounds can you hear in the words?
What do these sounds make?
What do you get if you remove the /p/ sound from Pen?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Writing

What goes into it?

A
Visual communication
Mapping symbols to language units
Limited number of symbols >>
➢Ambiguities
➢Limits features represented
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conrad 2008

Effect of practise

A

Word-specific transfer across skill: Proportion of practice words read and spelled correctly by both readers and spellers.
Group of kids being trained in reading
Group of kids being trained in spelling
Readers being good in reading but not good spelling
Spellers were as good as spelling as they were in reading
Uneven relationship between the two
Spelling important when learning to read

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Models of reading and spelling development

A

➢Coltheart Dual Route Cascaded Model
➢Frith Stages model
➢Ehri Phases model
➢Gentry Spelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is Colthearts et al 2001 model

A

Dual route cascaded model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Coltheart et al 2001
Dual route cascaded model
Routes

A
➢Lexical Semantic
➢Lexical non-semantic
➢Grapheme-Phoneme Conversion (GPC)
Units (e.g. letters) within each part
Excitation & inhibition
Turning written words into speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Lexical semantic route

A

Like a dictionary
Activated when flows
Lexicons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Dual route cascaded model

Early readers

A
  • Letter units

- GP system set up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Dual route cascaded model

Dyslexia

A

Phono & Ortho Lexicon
GPC
Letter Units

23
Q

Dual route cascaded model

A

Lexical non semantic route good for words like Yacht
GPC- graph (picture form)
Phomene (sound form)
Allows you to sound out words

24
Q

Dyslexia

A

Don’t have same access to pictures and sounds of words

Have issues with graphemes

25
Dual route cascaded model critiques
* How are different routes mastered? * When are they mastered? * Where does the GP convertor come from? •Spelling - how to go from speech back to spelling was not set up in the model
26
Ziegler 2007
Dual route cascaded model critique
27
What was Friths 1985 model
The stage model
28
Friths 1985 stage model
Logographic- Alphabetic - Orthogrpahic - ?? 3 stages Developmental model Effect of environment Steps Logographic- M in McDonalds, children may come to recognise the M (stored symbol?) Alphabetic - sounds that letters represent Orthographic - understanding of letters and words Left it open at the end of the model, could be extended to account for speech and writing Not full model but influential Language acquisition in a child
29
Frith 1985 six step model of skills in reading and writing acquisition
``` 1a 1b 2a 2b 3a 3b ```
30
Frith stages critique
* More fully specified * Developmental approach * Support for reading spelling linked stages * Bradley & Bryant , Berninger et al 1990, Wimmer et al 1991 * Orthographic understanding may build from start of acquisition * Cunningham & Stanovich (1993, 1990). * Fails to explain how changes occur. * Ehri: orthographic = non-phonological
31
•Bradley & Bryant , Berninger et al 1990, Wimmer et al 1991
Support for reading spelling linked stages
32
•Cunningham & Stanovich (1993, 1990).
Orthographic understanding may build from start of acquisition
33
What is Ehri 1995's model
``` Phase model (Similar to Friths model) ```
34
Ehri 1995 phase model
``` Prealphabetic (Pre school) Partial alphabetic (Early primary) Full alphabetic (primary 1) Consolidated alphabetic (Primary 2) ```
35
Pre alphabetic
Pre school Decoding, visual cues, sight word reading Scribbling,es resemble writing system
36
Partial alphabetic
Early primary Phonetic cue reading, basic graphemes phoneme connections, alphabetic knowledge Letter knowledge and phonemic Awareness essential Letters for sounds eg bz fo buzz
37
Full alphabetic
Primary 1 Full graphemes phoneme connections, decode by analogy to sight words, start to predict words from sounds Spelling phonetically complete, plausible spellings using conventional graphemes, I.e. GP connections befor route learning
38
Consolidated alphabetic
Primary 2 Graphemes-Phoneme decoding, memory of patterns, consolidate similar letter sequences Advanced alphabetic understanding of units, roots, affixes, families of words, invent of plausible spellings and known endings, e.g. Operate
39
Which stage where dyslexia starts to occur?
Partial Alphabetic | Early primary
40
Ehri 1995 Phase model | Two models
Reading and Spelling
41
Ehri Phases Critique
* Alphabetic concept emphasised * Importance of sight words * Importance of grapheme-phoneme connections (see Beech, 2005) * Flexible * No underlying cognitive structure * No mature reading stage * “Pre-alphabetic” is non-alphabetic, but what is it?
42
Beech 2005
Phases critique | •Importance of grapheme-phoneme connections
43
Stage / Phase Comparisons
* Structure for teachers & for monitoring progress (Ehri 1998) * Don’t specify entry requirements for each level * Some flexibility * Linking reading and spelling * Miss final stage
44
Comparisons | Dual route computational
* Specify underlying cognitive components * Complete model, not developmental * Unclear how instruction would interact
45
What is Gentry 1982 model
Spelling model
46
Gentry 1982 Spelling Model
* Precommunicative stage MPTVA * Semiphonetic stage E * Phonetic stage EGL * Transitional stage EEGEL * Correct stage EAGLE
47
Transparency affects importance of PA because:
Transparent: Early access to phonemes - improved reading – improved PA & phoneme representations Opaque: less access to phonemes – slower development of reading, PA & representations
48
Vellutino and Scanlon 1987 | Wagner et al 1997
Longitudinal evidence Prediction 295 nursery students, non readers Phonemic Segmentation : Best Predictor of Future Performance Vocabulary & Semantic Ability: Poorer prediction
49
Vellutino & Scanlon (1987)
``` Intervention evidence 300 children (G2 and G6) Poor and normal readers Tests: (3) Phonemic Segmentation Training Response Acquisition Control groups ``` Phonemic segmentation training = Good & Poor Readers improved in word identification & code acquisition
50
Melby-Lervag, Lyster & Hulme (2012)
TD & Dyslexia: Phonemic awareness larger unique contribution to word reading skills Phonemic Awareness - good prediction of word reading Rime Awareness VSTM
51
Katz and Frost 1992
Transparent language Shallow Consistent letter phoneme Italian / Finish Opaque Language Deep Ambiguous letter phoneme relations English
52
Cross Linguistic Studies
Phonological recoding (word-sound) = quicker to learn in transparent than opaque languages
53
English, an opaque language
``` Bomb, comb, tomb, Limb, climb Ache, anarchy, chameleon, parachute, machine Them, asthma, thyme Plough, cough, dough, thorough, Brought, drought Caught, draught ```
54
Ziegler et al 2010
1,265 children G2 Reading, Decoding, PA, Rapid Naming, Digit Span, NVIQ, Vocabulary Phonological Awareness predicted Reading Speed & Accuracy and Decoding Speed & Accuracy across all 5 languages PA even greater importance in opaque languages Vocab more important in transparent languages