reading and dyslexia Flashcards
the mental representation for comprehension
- input (speech)
- activate existing mental representations of sound
–> then link to meaning - output (comprehension)
the mental representation for comprehension - reading
- input (written word)
- activate existing mental representations of written words
–> then link to meaning - output (comprehension)
the building blocks we need for comprehension
- speech input
- form (phonology)
- syntax & morphology
- semantics
the building blocks we need for written word comprehension
- written word input
- form (phonology) & form (orthography)
- syntax & morphology
- semantics
form (orthography)
- alphabet
–> graphemes represent phonemes
–> e.g. M.I.N.T = mint - logographic system
–> characters represent words
–> e.g. 薄荷 = mint - Korean language
–> alphabetic language that looks like a logographic system
–> letters represent words but are grouped like characters
–> e.g. ㅂㅏㄱ ㅎㅏ-> 박하 = mint
do we need phonology (form) when reading?
- hotly debated topic
- most researchers agree that activation of phonological form occurs when reading
- helps with understanding
- occurs at an unconscious level
how many routes are there in terms of how we use the lexicon when comprehending written word?
3
route 1 in written word comprehension
- written word input
- activate letters
- activate phonemes (via letters)
- activate phonological form
- semantics
route 2 in written word comprehension
- written word input
- activate letters
- activate orthographic form
- activate phonological form
- semantics
route 3 in written word comprehension
- written word input
- activate letters
- activate orthographic form
- semantics
DRC: Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud
- excitatory connections
- excitatory + inhibitory connections between different modules
- excitatory connections motivate a process
- inhibitory connections stop a process
how can we measure the DRC?
- adjust the strength of connections
- provide input
- process input through model
- assess output of model against human performance
evaluate the DRC
- computational modelling allows us to ask very specific questions
- test the results
- but rarely able to model all the variables and parameters at work
- not likely to get an absolute answer
- but excellent to test specific questions
how does the DRC work?
- the model assumes that we have two routes to process visual words (reading)
- the ‘non-lexical’ route converts letters into sounds to activate a phonological representation that links to meaning
- the ‘lexical’ route activates an orthographic representation that is linked directly to meaning
what are 2 routes for reading according to the DRC
- lexical route
- non-lexical route
the lexical route of reading
- whole world orthographic representations
- orthographic lexicon
- semantics
- phonological lexicon
–> phonological can activate orthographic and vice versa
non-lexical route
- whole word phonological representations
– whole world orthographic representations - spelling to sound correspondence
- phonological lexicon
spelling-to-sound correspondence
- the relationship between letters and sounds is referred to as ‘grapheme phoneme correspondence’
- maybe key to understanding the problems encountered by people with dyslexia
graphemes & phonemes
- a single grapheme represents a single phoneme
- a grapheme can be made up of a number of letters
–> 2 letter grapheme = ‘th’ in ‘that’
–> 3 letter grapheme = ‘igh’ in ‘night’
–> 4 letter grapheme = ‘ough’ in ‘through’
variety in graphemes
- the same grapheme can be used to represent more than 1 phoneme (i in mint and pint)
- a single phoneme can be represented by more than 1 grapheme (/k/ can be represented by c, k, ck)
- lots of variety in how we represent phonemes via graphemes
- this leads to regular and irregular words
regular vs irregular words
- regular words = follow a set of rules that dictate how a grapheme should be pronounced
- regular pronunciation = aligns with the graphemes most frequent pronunciation
- e.g. mint is regular but pint is irregular
transparent vs opaque language
- you as readers and speakers of English learn regularities implicitly
- orthographies with a lot of regular correspondences = transparent language
- orthography with few regular correspondences - opaque language
- English not considered to be transparent orthography as too many irregular correspondences
shallow vs deep orthography
- transparent = shallow
–> the spelling of each word maps directly on to its pronunciation (e.g. Finnish or Italian) - opaque = deep
–> the spelling of each word does not map directly on to its pronunciation (e.g. English)