Reading 26 Risk Management Applications of Forward and Futures Strategies Flashcards
Q-Tech Advisors manages a portfolio consisting of $100 million, allocated 70 percent to stock at a beta of 1.05 and 30 percent to bonds at a modified duration of 5.5. As a tactical strategy, it would like to temporarily adjust the allocation to 60 percent stock and 40 percent bonds. Also, it would like to change the beta on the stock position from 1.05 to 1.00 and the modified duration from 5.5 to 5.0. It will use a stock index futures contract, which is priced at $280,000 and has a beta of 0.98, and a bond futures contract, which is priced at $125,000 and has an implied modified duration of 6.50.
- A. Determine how many stock index and bond futures contracts it should use and whether to go long or short.
- B. At the horizon date, the stock portfolio has fallen by 3 percent and the bonds have risen by 1 percent. The stock index futures price is $272,160, and the bond futures price is $126,500. Determine the market value of the portfolio assuming the transactions specified in Part A are done, and compare it to the market value of the portfolio had the transactions been done in the securities themselves.
- Solution to A:
To reduce the allocation from 70 percent stock ($70 million) and 30 percent bonds ($30 million) to 60 percent stock ($60 million) and 40 percent bonds ($40 million), Q-Tech must synthetically sell $10 million of stock and buy $10 million of bonds. First, assume that Q-Tech will sell $10 million of stock and leave the proceeds in cash. Doing so will require
Nsf=((0−1.05)/0.98)($10,000,000/$280,000)=−38.27
futures contracts. It should sell 38 contracts, which creates synthetic cash of $10 million. To buy $10 million of bonds, Q-Tech should buy
Nbf=((5.50−0.0)/6.50)($10,000,000/$125,000)=67.69
futures contracts, which rounds to 68. This transaction allows Q-Tech to synthetically borrow $10 million (selling a stock futures contract is equivalent to borrowing cash) and buy $10 million of bonds. Because we have created synthetic cash and a synthetic loan, these amounts offset. Thus, at this point, having sold 38 stock index futures and bought 68 bond futures, Q-Tech has effectively sold $10 million of stock and bought $10 million of bonds. It has produced a synthetically re-allocated portfolio of $60 million of stock and $40 million of bonds.
Now it needs to adjust the beta on the $60 million of stock to its target of 1.00. The number of futures contracts would, therefore, be
Nsf=((1.00−1.05)/0.98)($60,000,000/$280,000)=−10.93
So it should sell an additional 11 contracts. In total, it should sell 38 + 11 = 49 contracts.
To adjust the modified duration from 5.50 to its target of 5.00 on the $40 million of bonds, the number of futures contracts is
Nbf=((5−5.50)/6.50)($40,000,000/$125,000)=−24.62
So it should sell 25 contracts. In total, therefore, it should buy 68 – 25 = 43 contracts.
- Solution to B:
The value of the stock will be $70,000,000(1 – 0.03) = $67,900,000.
The profit on the stock index futures will be –49($272,160 – $280,000) = $384,160.
The total value of the stock position is therefore $67,900,000 + $384,160 = $68,284,160.
The value of the bonds will be $30,000,000(1.01) = $30,300,000.
The profit on the bond futures will be 43($126,500 – $125,000) = $64,500.
The total value of the bond position is, therefore, $30,300,000 + $64,500 = $30,364,500.
Therefore, the overall position is worth $68,284,160 + $30,364,500 = $98,648,660.
Had the transactions been done in the securities themselves, the stock would be worth $60,000,000(1 – 0.03) = $58,200,000. The bonds would be worth $40,000,000(1.01) = $40,400,000. The overall value of the portfolio would be $58,200,000 + $40,400,000 = $98,600,000, which is a difference of only $48,660 or 0.05 percent of the original value of the portfolio.
Total Asset Strategies (TAST) specializes in a variety of risk management strategies, one of which is to enable investors to take positions in markets in anticipation of future transactions in securities. One of its popular strategies is to have the client invest when it does not have the money but will be receiving it later. One client interested in this strategy will receive $6 million at a later date but wants to proceed and take a position of $3 million in stock and $3 million in bonds. The desired stock beta is 1.0, and the desired bond duration is 6.2. A stock index futures contract is priced at $195,000 and has a beta of 0.97. A bond futures contract is priced at $110,000 and has an implied modified duration of 6.0.
- A. Find the number of stock and bond futures contracts TAST should trade and whether it should go long or short.
- B. At expiration, the stock has gone down by 5 percent, and the stock index futures price is down to $185,737.50. The bonds are up 2 percent, and the bond futures price is up to $112,090. Determine the value of the portfolio and compare it with what it would have been had the transactions been made in the actual securities
- Solution to A:
The approximate number of stock index futures is
((1.00−0.0)/0.97)($3,000,000/$195,000)=15.86
So TAST should buy 16 contracts. The number of bond futures is
((6.2−0.0)/6.0)($3,000,000/$110,000)=28.18
So it should buy 28 contracts.
- Solution to B:
The profit on the stock index futures is 16($185,737.50 – $195,000) = –$148,200.
The profit on the bond futures is 28($112,090 – $110,000) = $58,520. The total profit is –$148,200 + $58,520 = –$89,680, a loss of $89,680. Suppose TAST had invested directly. The stock would have been worth $3,000,000(1 – 0.05) = $2,850,000, and the bonds would have been worth $3,000,000(1.02) = $3,060,000, for a total value of $2,850,000 + $3,060,000 = $5,910,000, or a loss of $90,000, which is about the same as the loss using only the futures.
Beta, formula
β=covSI/σ2I
where covSI is the covariance between the stock portfolio and the index and σ2I is the variance of the index.
Yield beta?
The yield beta is the sensitivity of the yield on a bond portfolio relative to the implied yield on the futures contract.
Implied yield of a futures contract is?
The implied yield of a futures contract is the yield implied by the futures price on the bond underlying the futures contract as of the futures expiration.
Credit risk VAR
Credit risk increases as the value of the position increases.
Since credit risk increases when the value of the position held increases, we should focus on the upper not lower tail of the distribution of gains on positions held when using VAR to evaluate credit risk.
Index Advantage (INDEXA) is a money management firm that specializes in turning the idle cash of clients into equity index positions at very low cost. INDEXA has a new client with about $500 million of cash that it would like to invest in the small-cap equity sector. INDEXA will construct the position using a futures contract on a small-cap index. The futures price is 1,500, the multiplier is $100, and the contract expires in six months. The underlying small-cap index has a dividend yield of 1 percent. The risk-free rate is 3 percent per year.
- A. Determine exactly how the cash can be equitized using futures contracts.
- B. When the futures contract expires, the index is at ST. Demonstrate how the position produces the same outcome as an actual investment in the index.
- Solution to A:
INDEXA should purchase
Nf=$500,000,000(1.03)0.5/($100*1,500)=3,382.96
futures contracts. Round this amount to Nf* = 3,383. Then invest
(3,383*$100*1,500)/(1.03)0.5=$500,005,342
in risk-free bonds paying 3 percent interest. Note that this is not exactly an initial investment of $500 million, because one cannot purchase fractions of futures contracts. The bonds will grow to a value of $500,005,342(1.03)0.5 = $507,450,000. The number of units of stock effectively purchased through the use of futures is
Nf*q/(1+δ)T=(3,383*100)(/1.01)0.5=336,621.08
If 336,621.08 shares were actually purchased, the accumulation and reinvestment of dividends would result in there being 336,621.08 (1.01)0.5 = 338,300 shares at the futures expiration.
- Solution to B:
At expiration, the payoff on the futures is
3,383(100)(ST – 1500) = 338,300ST – $507,450,000
In other words, to settle the futures, INDEXA will owe $507,450,000 and receive the equivalent of 338,300 units of stock worth ST.
Royal Tech Ltd. is a UK technology company that has recently acquired a US subsidiary. The subsidiary has an underfunded pension fund, and Royal Tech has absorbed the subsidiary’s employees into its own pension fund, bringing the US subsidiary’s defined-benefit plan up to an adequate level of funding. Soon Royal Tech will be making its first payments to retired employees in the United States. Royal Tech is obligated to pay about $1.5 million to these retirees. It can easily set aside in risk-free bonds the amount of pounds it will need to make the payment, but it is concerned about the foreign currency risk in making the US dollar payment. To manage this risk, Royal Tech is considering using a forward contract that has a contract rate of £0.60 per dollar.
- A. Determine how Royal Tech would eliminate this risk by identifying an appropriate forward transaction. Be sure to specify the notional principal and state whether to go long or short. What domestic transaction should it undertake?
- B. At expiration of the forward contract, the spot exchange rate is ST. Explain what happens.
- Solution to A:
Royal Tech will need to come up with $1,500,000 and is obligated to buy dollars at a later date. It is thus short dollars. To have $1,500,000 secured at the forward contract expiration, Royal Tech would need to go long a forward contract on the dollar. With the forward rate equal to £0.60, the contract will need a notional principal of £900,000. So Royal Tech must set aside funds so that it will have £900,000 available when the forward contract expires. When it delivers the £900,000, it will receive £900,000(1/£0.60) = $1,500,000, where 1/£0.60 ≈ $1.67 is the dollar-per-pound forward rate.
- Solution to B:
At expiration, it will not matter what the spot exchange rate is. Royal Tech will deliver £900,000 and receive $1,500,000.
Equity Analysts Inc. (EQA) is an equity portfolio management firm. One of its clients has decided to be more aggressive for a short period of time. It would like EQA to move the beta on its $65 million portfolio from 0.85 to 1.05. EQA can use a futures contract priced at $188,500, which has a beta of 0.92, to implement this change in risk.
- A. Determine the number of futures contracts EQA should use and whether it should buy or sell futures.
- B. At the horizon date, the equity market is down 2 percent. The stock portfolio falls 1.65 percent, and the futures price falls to $185,000. Determine the overall value of the position and the effective beta.
- Solution to A:
The number of futures contracts EQA should use is
Nf=((1.05−0.85)/0.92)($65,000,000/$188,500)=74.96
So EQA should buy 75 contracts.
- Solution to B:
The value of the stock portfolio will be $65,000,000(1 – 0.0165) = $63,927,500. The profit on the futures transaction is 75($185,000 – $188,500) = –$262,500. The overall value of the position is $63,927,500 – $262,500 = $63,665,000.
Thus, the overall return is $63,665,000/$65,000,000−1=−0.0205
Because the market went down by 2 percent, the effective beta is 0.0205/0.02 = 1.025.
Creating a Synthetic Index Fund, illustrate
To create this synthetic index fund, we must buy a certain number of futures. Let the following be the appropriate values of the inputs:
V = amount of money to be invested, £100 million
f = futures price, £4,000
T = time to expiration of futures, 0.25
δ = dividend yield on the index, 0.025
r = risk-free rate, 0.05
q = multiplier, £10
We would like to replicate owning the stock and reinvesting the dividends. How many futures contracts would we need to buy and add to a long bond position? We designate Nf as the required number of futures contracts and Nf* as its rounded-off value.
Now observe that the payoff of Nf* futures contracts will be Nf*q(ST – f). This equation is based on the fact that we have Nf* futures contracts, each of which has a multiplier of q. The futures contracts are established at a price of f. When it expires, the futures price will be the spot price, ST, reflecting the convergence of the futures price at expiration to the spot price.
The futures payoff can be rewritten as Nf*qST – Nf*qf. The minus sign on the second term means that we shall have to pay Nf*qf. The (implied) plus sign on the first term means that we shall receive Nf*qST. Knowing that we buy Nf* futures contracts, we also want to know how much to invest in bonds. We shall call this V* and calculate it based on Nf*. Below we shall show how to calculate Nf* and V*. If we invest enough money in bonds to accumulate a value of Nf*qf, this investment will cover the amount we agree to pay for the FTSE: Nf* × q × f. The present value of this amount is Nf*qf/(1 + r)T.
Because the amount of money we start with is V, we should have V equal to Nf*qf/(1 + r)T. From here we can solve for Nf* to obtain
Nf*=V(1+r)T/(qf ) (rounded to an integer)
But once we round off the number of futures, we do not truly have V dollars invested. The amount we actually have invested is
V*=Nf*qf/(1+r)T
We can show that investing V* in bonds and buying Nf* futures contracts at a price of f is equivalent to buying Nf*q/(1 + δ)T units of stock.
- All this transaction does is capture the performance of the index. Because the index is a price index only and does not include dividends, this synthetic replication strategy can capture only the index performance without the dividends.
- Another concern that could be encountered in practice is that the futures contract could expire later than the desired date. If so, the strategy will still be successful if the futures contract is correctly priced when the strategy is completed. Consistent with that point, we should note that any strategy using futures will be effective only to the extent that the futures contract is correctly priced when the position is opened and also when it is closed. This point underscores the importance of understanding the pricing of futures contracts.
Measuring betas and durations as an obstacle for hedging
Because they can be somewhat unstable, betas and durations are difficult to measure, even under the best of circumstances. Even when no derivatives transactions are undertaken, the values believed to be the betas and durations may not truly turn out to reflect the sensitivities of stocks and bonds to the underlying sources of risk. Therefore, if derivatives transactions do not work out to provide the exact hedging results expected, users should not necessarily blame derivatives.
If we wish to change the beta, we specify the desired beta as a target beta of βT using futures?
Nf = [(βT−βS)/βf]*(S/f)
- if we want to increase the beta, βT will exceed βS and the sign of Nf will be positive, which means that we must buy futures. If we want to decrease the beta, βT will be less than βS, the sign of Nf will be negative, and we must sell futures.
- need to remember that the futures contract will hedge only the risk associated with the relationship between the portfolio and the index on which the futures contract is based.
- recall also that dividends can interfere with how this transaction performs. Index futures typically are based only on price indices; they do not reflect the payment and reinvestment of dividends. Therefore, dividends will accrue on the stocks but are not reflected in the index. This is not a major problem, however, because dividends in the short-term period covered by most contracts are not particularly risky.
The actual adjusted duration of a bond portfolio vs. the desired duration?
The actual adjusted duration of a bond portfolio may not equal the desired duration for a number of reasons, including that the yield beta may be inaccurate or unstable or the bonds could contain call features or default risk.
In addition, duration is a measure of instantaneous risk and may not accurately capture the risk over a long horizon without frequent portfolio adjustments.
Synthetics Inc. (SYNINC) executes a variety of synthetic strategies for pension funds. One such strategy is to enable the client to maintain a liquid balance in cash while retaining exposure to equity market movements. A similar strategy is to enable the client to maintain its position in the market but temporarily convert it to cash. A client with a $100 million equity position wants to convert it to cash for three months. An equity market futures contract is priced at $325,000, expires in three months, and is based on an underlying index with a dividend yield of 2 percent. The risk-free rate is 3.5 percent.
- A. Determine the number of futures contracts SYNINC should trade and the effective amount of money it has invested in risk-free bonds to achieve this objective.
- B. When the futures contracts expire, the equity index is at ST. Show how this transaction results in the appropriate outcome.
- Solution to A:
First note that no multiplier is quoted here. The futures price of $325,000 is equivalent to a quoted price of $325,000 and a multiplier of 1.0. The number of futures contracts is
Nf=−$100,000,000(1.035)0.25/$325,000=−310.35
Rounding off, SYNINC should sell 310 contracts. This is equivalent to selling futures contracts on stock worth
(310*$325,000)/(1.035)0.25=$99,887,229
and is the equivalent of investing $99,887,229 in risk-free bonds, which will grow to a value of $99,887,229(1.035)0.25 = $100,750,000. The number of units of stock being effectively converted to cash is (ignoring the minus sign)
Nf*q/(1+δ)T=310(1)/(1.02)0.25=308.47
The accumulation and reinvestment of dividends would make this figure grow to 308.47(1.02)0.25 = 310 units when the futures expires.
- Solution to B:
At expiration, the profit on the futures is –310(ST – $325,000) = –310ST + $100,750,000. That means SYNINC will have to pay 310ST and will receive $100,750,000 to settle the futures contract. Due to reinvestment of dividends, it will end up with the equivalent of 310 units of stock, which can be sold to cover the amount –310ST. This will leave $100,750,000, the equivalent of having invested in risk-free bonds.
Economic exposure (risk)
Economic exposure is the loss of sales that a domestic exporter might experience if the domestic currency appreciates relative to a foreign currency.