reading 1 - chapter 2 and 3 Flashcards

1
Q

distrust and rivalry between European states until after ww2 bc?

A

divisions:

  • language
  • culture
  • political
  • religion
  • historical experience
  • economic

-> tensions, hostility and war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the background of ww2

A

between the wars:

  • sharp and fluid inter-state relations
  • no clear balance of power or alliance system
  • treaties/pacts often unpatterned and created out of fear
  • sometimes greater cooperation but little came of it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

LoN failed bc

A
  1. vague aims
  2. intergovernmental -> everyone had to agree
  3. states wanted different things from it: maintain vs change treaty of Versailles status quo
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

after ww2

A

new relations:

  • unbroken peace: EU countries seen as allies, not threat + similar view of who were threats
  • transformed agenda: more varied, high->lower politics
  • new challenges and processes: growing contact, enmeshing and expansion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explanatory approach of the transformation after ww2

A
  1. deep roots of European integration
  2. impact WW2
  3. increasing importance interdependence
  4. differing positions western European states

!not mutually exclusive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

deep roots of European integration

A
  • ideological: common identity of interest in Europe
    (historical critique: always been more conflict)
  • overstates peace and cooperation in C19 (since C18 more and more cooperation, but last quarter C19 more protectionism and nationalism etc. -> free trading system disappears)

industrial and economic liberalisation are bases for furtherance interconnectedness, but don’t guarantee them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the impact of the second world war

A

ww2 was a turning point:

political factors

1 combating nationalism (e.g. Council of Europe, European Convention of Human Rights)
2. new map of continental Europe (iron curtain + liberal western ideals)
! role of US should not be overstated but also not understated
3. new international power balance -> Europe caught between great powers led to feeling of unity
4. the German problem: should be contained

economic factor = end war -> want for international economic and financial arrangements (Bretton Woods 1944, IMF, etc.)

  • EU balance of payment deficit -> Marshall help with conditions of EU integration -> Organisation for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC)
    *became OECD (organisation for european cooperation and development) in 1961
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

interdependence

A
  • increased world trade
  • internationalisation production
  • fluctuations / uncertainty currency exchanges
  • within western Eur specfic: external increasingly centered around western-EU + from 60s Germany strongest economy

-> vulnerability to outside events + acting in isolation often impossible -> countries cooperate/consult

!!influence modern interdependence should not be overstated:

  1. doesn’t produce unavoidable set integrationist processes + dev.
  2. political factors have continued to be important in shaping integration processes
  3. other types of interdependence remain important (e.g. Eur powers limited power when acting alone)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

national considerations

A

not all states equally willing to cooperate/integrate bco loss of sov.
-> limited membership until 1970s

founding members:

  • Benelux: ww2 emphasised vulnerability to neighbors + were already used to economic cooperation + none were strong enough to ignore integration initivates Franco-German
  • Italy: new start after fascism + anti-communistic sentiment + eco. difficulties
  • France: contain Germany + eco. growth
  • West-Germany: regain self-respect + place in international community + against eastern threat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

! there was / wasnt a common and coherent integrationist force?

A

NOT such a force:

  • multiple IGOs and plans
  • relationship between states often uneasy bco different national interests
  • slow/rigid process of integration
  • 1990s end cold war -> turbulence integration Eastern Europe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the ECSC

A

early impetus = Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman 1950
- both support European unity and OEEC and CoE + wanted something more ambituous

April 1951 Treaty of Paris, into force in 1952, expired in 2002

ECSC treaty broke new ground:

  1. ambitious policy aims: free trade arena and foundations common market
  2. first European inter-state org. with sign. supranational characteristics

key institutions:

  • high authority
  • council of ministers
  • common assembly (chosen y national parliament, motion of censure and advisory function)
  • court of justice

ECSC was successful -> impetus further integration

!! problems ECSC:

  1. declining importance steel and coal ->need for coordinated and effective community energy spending (but national differences prevented this)
  2. 1958-1959 overproduction (cheap oil import and fall energy consumption) -> countries tried to solve it on their own
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

EDC

A

= European Defence Community
(context: cold war + no want to rearm germany)

idea (coined by Pleven): European army
-> 1952 draft EDC trety, not ratified:

  • unease German rearmement
  • doubt about efficiency
  • Fa didn’t want to lose control of forces
  • discontent that UK did not participate
  • end wars -> feeling it was not necessary

1955 alternative = West European Union: Italy and West-Germany were added to the Brussels Treaty for Cooperation

!EDC shows: rapid integration and political sensitive areas would lead to resistance
- BUT: it came close to ratification: shows alternative intitiatives are possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Messina Resolution 1955

A

ECSC states plans for further economic integration -> Spaak committee (UK participated for a bit)

led to a report that was used as basis negotiations april 1956 (treaties of Rome)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Treaties of Rome

A
  • EEC
    (treaty diff than nation states: centered around specific policy)
  • Euratom
    (there were many loopholes and exceptions, e.g when national security interests were involved you could keep secrets)

signed: 25 march 1957
into force: 1 january 1958

*lots of negotiations, e.g. France wanted special protection farmers

! clear rules trade, BUT only guiding principles for social and agricultural policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

EEC broad objectives

A
  1. common market
  2. approximating eco. policies of MS
  3. harmonious. dev. eco. activities
  4. continuous + balanced expansion
  5. increase in stability + standard of living
  6. closer relationship between states

Guidelines for policy development = concerned with est. common market + a community more than just a common market

  • removal of tarrifs -> est. common market
  • CET: common external tarrif
  • prohibtiion activities that distort competition
  • measures to promote movements goods, persons, services and capital
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

EEC treaty should/shouldn’t be overstated?

A

should not be overstated:

  1. competition was seen as requiring considerable intervention an dmanagement from the center
  2. there were some provisions for non-market policies
  3. never intend of full/fast market econ.: no abondment national economic control
17
Q

institutional provisions Rome treaties

A

4 key institutions

  1. commission
  2. Council of ministers
  3. Assembly
  4. Court of Justice

!key difference with ECSC = Council anonimous decisionmaking + less power commission

!treaties had foundation for more supranationalism (e.g. more majority decisionmaking with age + assembly evnetually chosen by universal suffrage)

18
Q

foundations 3 European communities:

A
  • Treaty of Paris
  • Treaty of Rome