lecture 2 - a history of EU integration Flashcards

1
Q

why should we even study history?

A
  1. provide context
  2. to propose useful/realistic solutions (many problems are historically rooted + don’t want to repeat same mistakes)
  3. some theories explicitly refer to history (e.g. historical institutionalism, path dependency)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the EU?

A

different views:

  • IO = little autonomy, most decisions through bargaining
  • regional integration association = similar to e.g. ASEAN and African Union
  • political system in own right = state like or superstate
  • unique / sui generis
  • hybrid: mix of all of the above
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Early ideas about European integration
(Richard con Coudenhove-Kalergi + Aristide Briand + Churchill)

A

(ideas EU may have origins in the antiques, but immediate early ideas during/pre ww)

Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi (Austrian diplomat)
!no big effects then, but inspired ater politicians (Briand, Adenauer, Churchill e.g.)

  • 1923: idea of PanEuropa = 5 global powerfields: PanEuropa (incl. colonies) + British Empire + Americas + Soviet Union + Eastern Asia
  • proposed a 4-stage proces for achievement EU:
    1. conference for representatives from 26 Eur states
    2. agreement of treaties for settlement of Eur disputes
    3. development customs union
    4. drafting federal European institution

Aristide Briand: called for European federation, creation EU and common market
(1920s)

Churchill
(in powerpoint Edouard Herriot 1924 is mentioned next to Churchill)

  • 1946: United States of Europe
  • focus on France and Germany, wanted to keep UK out (maintain sovereignty)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

challenges of postwar Europe
3

A
  1. rebuild destroyed economies
    - Marshall plan + Organisation For European Economic Cooperation (as if 1960: OECD)
  2. ensure security
    - foundation NATO 1949 + bring Germany in Western community, allow rearmament under supranational supervision (Schuman plan)
  3. limit danger of nationalism that caused the wars in Europe
    - European movement that champions European federation 1948
    - Council of Europe 1949 (somewhat limited powers, but strong with judging legality)
    - European Convention of Human Rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the Schuman Plan

A

Europe day: 9 May 1950

Schuman: Europe will not be made at once, it is built, first with a de facto solidarity

  • origin: French mistrust of German strength + US pressure to fix relationship
  • objectives: social, political and economical (not just political or economic)
  • Schuman (+ Monnet) laid foundation federation essential for preservation of peace
  • participants/members: Italy, Germany, Benelux, France

product: ECSC (Treaty of Paris 1951) = cooperation coal and steel -> control production of weapons + break- German industry

interdependence -> impossibility laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Treaty of Paris

A

1951

creation ECSC

  • Italy
  • Germany
  • Belgium
  • Netherlands
  • France
  • Luxembourg

Schumanplan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The European Coal and Steel Community

A

Treaty of Paris 1951

didn’t manage to create single market, but showed that econ. integration in this way was feasible

High Authority (predecessor European Commission)

  • 9 members (6y terms, 2 per big states, smaller states got 1)
  • to remove barriers free movement coal/steel + represent interest ECSC

Special Council of Ministers (predecessor European Council)

  • gov. ministers, presidency rotated every 3 months
  • to make decisions on High Authority proposals

Common Assembly (predecessor EP)

  • 78 members chosen by national legisl., divided on basis of population
  • advisory

Court of Justice (predecessor European Court of Justice)

  • 7 members: 6 judges + 1 trade union representative
  • settle conflicts + ruled on legality High Authority decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Road to Paris (timeline)

A
  • 1946 Zurich speech = United States of Europe (Churchill) + Council of Europe
  • 1947 creation of UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe)
  • 1948 The Hague Congress = Churchill European Unity, Council of Europe, College of Europe
  • 1948 Organisation for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) - Marshall plan
  • 1949 Council of Europe = human rights
  • 1952 ECSC = pooling heavy industries, community of fact, making war impossible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

1950s integration optimism

A

success ECSC

Move to rethink Franco-German conflict (German rearmament) pushed by the US

  • US wanted: German rearment to have NATO contribution
  • France wanted: Pleven Plan = common defense, European Army, European minister of defense (German rearmament directly integrated into supranational army)
    *Jean Monnet helped come up with this plan

Adenauer proposed European Defence Community in 1949 (before Pleven plan)
- UK refused to participate: was to supranational
- France refused to participate: no (large) German army
*idea of a European Political Community died with the idea of the EDC

1954 West European Union: intergov. military cooperation (UK initiative) = diff from EDC as it is not supranational + France accepted (bc UK joined)
(ended in 2011 in the shadow of NATO)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Treaties of Rome

A

1957
Euratom + EEC

context: failed political and military integration + Jean Monnet appointed president of the ECSC Authority

Euratom = European Atomic Energy Community

European Economic Community =

  • single market within 12 years (free movement of people + capital + services)
  • common external tariffs + no customs
  • common policies agriculture, trade transport and competition
  • European Social Fund + ECB
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EEC

A

= skeleton/foundation EU today

Commission (would become the (supranational) European Commission))

  • 9 members, 6 year terms
  • initiating policy + overseeing implementation

Council of Ministers (intergovernmental)

  • gov. ministers sharing 17 votes
  • decision making: unanimity or simple majority or QMV or 12 votes from 4 states
  • making decisions on Commission proposals

Parliamentary Assembly (EP from 1962)

  • 142 appointed members (from 1962 elections)
  • question/censure Commission, had little legislative authority

Court of Justice

  • 7 judges, renewable 6 year terms
  • interpreting treaties + ensuring fulfilling treaty obligations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Early days of the EEC

A

uncertainty and crisis 1958-1972

context: security threats SU + Cuban Missile Crisis + escalation cold war in Vietnam

EEC ->

  1. increase intra-EEC trade, but only limited removal barriers movement of workers
  2. increased cooperation on international trade negotiations (from late 60s, e.g. Venice declaration)

need to expand membership for single market to flourish
- 1961 UK applied for membership, but De Gaulle double-veto 1963 and 1967 (suspicious of US atomic power influence on UK + diff visions for Europe (independent of US))

crises:

CAP 1968: Common Agricultural Policy = single market + assured prices for farmers
- important for security: prevent shortages
- unintended consequence: butter mountains (overproduction)

The Empty Chair Crisis 1965 = France’s absence from Council of Ministers negotiations CAP (France was concerned with decision-making procedures (CAP would be supranational), did not want to lose veto)

  • Luxembourg compromise: no self-financing CAP + no budgetary control of the EP + member states keep informal veto right (when national interest is affected)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

changing community 1973-1984

A

1973 = new MS: Denmark, Ireland, UK (De Gaulle was gone -> no resistance)

1978 = European Monetary system

1979 = frist direct elections EP

1981 = Greece joins EC (was not eco. ready, but politically would be good for democratization to join)

1986 = Spain and Portugal joined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Single European Act

A

SEA 1986
(act as powerful as a treaty)
initiated by Jacques Delors, deepened integration

  • eco focus: reduce trade barriers + complete internal market by dec 1992
  • introduced QMV on some issues in the Council (supranational move)
  • legalised European Council (heads of gov.) + formalized European Political Cooperation (was at first informal and implicit)
  • EEC -> EC
  • new agenda: social cohesion (social charter 1983) + environment + research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Maastricht Treaty on the EU

A

1992 (Treaty on European Union)
created the EU + 3 pillars + EMU (Economic and Monetary Union)

3 pillars (to preserve the different decision-making modes in various policy fields)

  • ‘community’ pillar = what the MS were ready to completely integrate
  • CFSP = common foreign and security policy
  • justice and home affairs

changes:

  • extended QMV provisions in the Council (-> more supranational)
  • new EP powers: co-decisions procedure (bigger role in policy making)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

EMU

A

created with Maastricht Treaty 1992

3 stage plan for single currency

5 criteria in order to participate (new members)

  1. budget deficit <3%
  2. public debt <60% GDP
  3. inflation within 1.5%
  4. interest rates within 2% of average 3 countries with lowest rates
  5. stable exchange rates

1998 ECB (Frankfurt)
2002 introducing Euro in 12 member states (first single currency in Europe since Roman era)
- UK, Denmark and Sweden did not participate

*in general: public supportive of Euro, even after crisis (but still: part not supportive)

17
Q

Dev. EU’s foreign and security policy

A

wars in Balkans + breakup Yugoslavia -> baptism by fire for EU CFSP & ESDP (later CSDP)

Luxembourg foreign minister: this is the hour of Europe

EU not successful -> impetus further cooperation

1999 creation High Representative for CFSP (face for external relations)
- Treaty of Amsterdam

18
Q

Constitutional Treaty

A

2004 (changed name)
- led by d’Estaing

dev. by European Convention on the future of Europe

105 delegates: gov. states + opposition parties states + civil society

  • want for more democracy, efficiency, transparency and legitimacy
  • legal personality across pillars (e.g. unified representation in UN)
  • creating European External Action Service

critique: complex, legal, self-referential

!never came into being: NL and France failed to ratify it with referenda

  • NL: 63% turnout, 62% rejected = hate for own pro-const. gov. + perception EU as elitist + resentment other decisions had no referenda + concerns immigration
  • France: 69% turnout, 55% rejected = unpopularity president Chirac + sovereignty concerns + econ. concerns (imposition ‘neoliberal eco. model’)
19
Q

Treaty of Lisbon

A

2007 (newer version Treaty on European Union)
‘different in approach, but not in content’, more low-key than Constitutional Treaty 2004

created:

  • president of the European Council (first this position was shared), appointed by members + approved by parliament
  • High Representative for Foreign affairs and Security Policy, with new European External Action Service
  • equal powers EP and Council of Ministers
  • legal personality (-> EU in Charter of Fundamental Rights + European Convention on Human Rights)
  • formal recognition exit option
  • extended QMV (except: foreign and defense policy and taxation)
20
Q

deepening vs widening integration

A

deepening = dev./strengthening EU competences and policies = ever-closer union

  • e.g. introduction Euro and EMU, also pol. cooperation increased

widening = enlargement
art. 49 Treaty on the European Union: any state that respects principles set out in art.6 may apply
e.g. Ukraine when Orange Revolution claimed it could apply

21
Q

Copenhagen Criteria

A

1993
membership requirements (widening integration)

  1. stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy
  2. rule of law
  3. human rights and respect/protection minorities
  4. existence of functioning market econ.
  5. the capacity to cope with competitive pressures and market forces within the union

-> transformative function/effect on applicants

22
Q

widening integration - overview

A
  • 1952 = Benelux, France, Italy, West-Germany
  • 1973 = Britain, Denmark, Ireland
  • 1981 = Greece
  • 1986 = Spain, Portugal
  • 1990 = East Germany (German reunification)
  • 1995 = Austria, Finland, Sweden
  • 2004 = Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia
  • 2007 = Bulgaria, Romania
  • 2013 = Croatia
23
Q

widening integration
1952

A
  • Benelux
  • France
  • Italy
  • West-Germany
24
Q

widening integration
1973

A
  • Britain
  • Denmark
  • Ireland
25
Q

widening integration
1981

A
  • Greece
26
Q

widening integration
1986

A
  • Spain
  • Portugal
27
Q

widening integration
1990

A
  • East Germany (German reunification)
28
Q

widening integration
1995

A
  • Austria
  • Finland
  • Sweden
29
Q

widening integration
2004

A
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Estonia
  • Hungary
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Malta
  • Poland
  • Slovakia
  • Romania
30
Q

widening integration
2013

A
  • Croatia
31
Q

treaty dates

A