Rare diseases Flashcards
Why are rare diseases so hard to cure
- They are hard to diagnose – really hard to treat because really hard to diagnose
- Small population size
- Limited funding
Diagnosing rare disease
Rare disease = really hard to diagnose
- Really hard to treat rare disease because really hard to diagnose
- People = trained to find the most likely reason but rare disease might be the most likley trait = hard to diagnose
“When you hear hooves sometimes its a zebra” – rare because you think hooves (not always most common thing)
Mascot for rare disease
Zebra
Issue with Population size for rare diseases
- Harder to collect information
- Not enough cases/controls for GWAS study
Because of population size – hard to find what genes control it
- Can’t do GWAS to find what genes control it because there are few people = not enough to do GWAS
Funding for studying rare diseases
Federal grant monies are given to projects that will make the biggest impact
- Want to fund things that help the most people
- Hard to get people to help 1/2 families when can help 1000s = rare diseases get overlooked
Low profitability for corporations
- Companies won’t make money on drugs –> not enough people will buy it = companies won’t make it
Example Rare disease
Chronic Tubuliontersyitial Kidney Disease
Chronic Tubuliontersyitial Kidney Disease
Rare disease – A group of kidney diseases afefcteing tubules of kidney
- Chronic kidney disease
- Requires Dialysis
- Requires Kidney transplants
Rare – 500 US families
Answer: Autosomal Dominant
NOT X-linked because II.1 is affected if X linked = III.1 would have to be affected
Answer: 1 – because having one dominant allele is all you need to get the disease
If was controlled by two genes = you would need 2 dominant alleles –> would be in 1/16 kids
How can you identify the disease allele
- Sequencey entire genome
- Look at candidate genes
- Linkage
Why do we want to know the gene
If we know the gene = we can tailor treatment for disease
Issue with sequencing (Challeneges)
- Cost of sequencing (not as big of an issue now)
- Time and cost of sequence analysis –> we have the technology BUT need to anaylyze it
- Need to put small sequcnes together and compare it to others – takes time
- Accuracey – have a 99.99% accuracey BUT that would mean 300,000 inaccruacies when looking at 3 Billion BP genome
- If looking for one gene –> how will you find the one gene if it might have inaacuracies
Can do sequencing to find gene BUT it is not always productive
Using candidate genes Ex.
2018 – 500 US families had sequencing of candidate genes –> found mutations in different genes (MUC1, REN, SEC61A, UMOD1)
Looked at genes they knew were involved in kidney function
Using linkage to identify gene in rare disease
Don’t always need to find a gene mutation that causes disease –> can find something linked to the gene that has mutations
- Can see what SNP co-segragtes with disease THEN the SNP is a marker that is inherited with the disease
Most SNPs = not linked to gene just looking for ones that are
FINDING SNP = can show you region of the disease causing gene –> can then look for the gene more easily
- If use linkage – see SNP that is linked to the disease gene = know where to look for the disease gene
Answer: DA and dG –> If linked only get the parental gametes (same phase as parents) because no recombination