Randomised Controlled Trials Flashcards
What are the 4 explanations of an observation?
- Bias (linked to study design)
- Confounding (linked to study design)
- Chance (statistics)
- Hypothesis is correct –> effective
What is the difference between internal and external validity?
Internal = study design, statistics, patients in study External = is it generalisable to the general population
What are the types of intervention study?
- before and after intervention
- intervention group compared to control
- randomised controlled trial: cluster or individual
What does cluster randomisation aim to reduce?
- contamination or crossover
Explaining our observations: Before and After study
- bias
- confounding
- chance
- difference in measurement before and after
- some other factor has changed before and after
- change - is difference a fluke?
What is regression to the mean?
- most things vary to some extent by chance
- if we observe an extreme value, this is partly due to chance
- therefore the next observation is likely to be closer to the mean
- can give the appearance of improvement
What is one way of getting round regression to the mean in before and after studies?
- introduce a control arm
Explaining our observations: Controlled study
- bias
- confounding
- chance
- patients or researchers beliefs affect outcomes measurement
- differences between groups at the start
- some other difference in the way in which groups are treated
- differences between groups at the start
- chance
How does an RCT reduce bias and confounding and chance?
Bias = patients, researchers, analysts can be blinded Confounding = differences at the beginning are only due to chance, randomly distributes factors Chance = bigger study pop, decreases chance
Define RCT
- intervention study
- participants allocated to two or more groups
- groups receive different interventions
- allocation to groups is random
- groups followed up after randomisation
- outcome assessed
What is the effect of randomisation?
- ensures known and unknown charactertistics that might affect the outcome (confounders) are distributed by chance
- any differences between groups at the start are due to chance
- minimises confounding
Explaining our observations: RCT
- bias
- confounding
- chance
- Bias: in data recording - due to differences in data collection
- Confounding: at the start - are groups systematically different, at finish - due to differences in follow up, something other than the intervention is different
- Chance - are results due to chance? T test to compare means
What are the 7 potential issues with RCTs?
- choice of outcome measure
- ethics
- choice of control
- contamination or crossover
- bias in assessment of outcome
- losses to follow up
- sample size
- Explain how ‘choice of outcome’ can affect a study
Ideally measure outcome relevant to patient
- if proxy are we confident is this linked to outcome
Clinical effectiveness
- measure clinical outcome e.g. cure
Patient experience
- QoL or disease specific measure
- Explain how ‘ethics’ can affect a study
Are individuals disadvantages by being randomised to inrevetion or control?
- if we believe one is better, we cannot ethically randomised
- need EQUIPOISE - need to not know which is better