Observational Studies Flashcards
Descriptive studies ……. hypotheses
Analytic studies ……… hypotheses
generate
test
Define bias
Systematic deviation of results from the truth, or the processes leading to such deviation
Give examples of the following:
- selection bas
- information (observation) bias
Selection bias - sampling bias - responder bias - follow-up bias Information (observation) bias - recall bias/social acceptability bias - recording bias/interviewer bias
Define confounding
effects of additional variable that might be responsibly for an observed association
Confounder can:
- cause spurious association
- exaggerate association
- or mask association between exposure and disease
Define incidence
- the total number of new cases commending during a specified period in a defined population
Define prevelance
- the total number of individuals who have the diseases at a particular time
Prevalence = incidence x duration of disease
Explain what incidence rate is and how to calculate it
number of new cases of a specific disease arising within a population over a specified time period divided by the person-time accumulated
Explain what incidence risk is and how to calculate it
number of new cases of a specific diseases arising within a population over a specified time period divided by the number of persons at res at the beginning of the time period
Explain was point prevalence is and how to calculate it
number of persons with disease at some time point
divided by
total population at risk of disease at the same time point
Explain what period prevalence is and how to calculate it
number of persons with disease at any time during a specified period
divided by
total population sen over the period of time
What are the 8 criteria for assessing causality?
- biological plausibility
- time
- strength of association
- biological gradient or dose-response relationship
- consistency
- specificity
- coherence
- experiments
Criteria for Assessing Causality
1. biological plausibilty
does it make biological sense
Criteria for Assessing Causality
2. time
logically a cause must precede its potential effect
Criteria for Assessing Causality
3. strength of association
the stronger the association of an exposure with disease occurence then the harder to conceive of likely confounders which might explain the association
Criteria for Assessing Causality
4. biological gradient or dose-response relationship
causality as a plausible interpretation is strengthened if there is a strong dose-response