R8.6 – Anti-Trust Regulation Flashcards
Sherman Act
2 sections:
- Prohibits contracts, combinations, and conspiracies that restrain trade
- Prohibits monopolies and attempts to monopolize
Sherman Act only applies to activities that have a significant impact on interstate commerce
Sherman Act criminal in nature: Violations are crimes
4 Antitrust Laws
- Sherman act
- Clayton act
- Robinson-Patman act
- Federal Trade Commission act
Sherman Act Section 1 & 2: Unilateral vs concerted actions
Section 1violations requires concerted action between at least two parties
– Note: A corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary viewed as one entity
Section 2 violations can be by unilateral action or by multiple parties acting together
Sherman Act Section 1: Per Se Violations
– Horizontal restraints
– Horizontal price fixing
– Horizontal market allocations
– Horizontal agreements to boycott a product, manufacturer, distributor
– tying agreements where seller has considerable economic power
Sherman Act Section 1: Judged under Rule of Reason
– Vertical restraints
– Veertical price fixing
– Veertical market allocations
– Non-horizontal agreements to boycott a product, manufacturer, distributor
– tying agreements where seller does not have considerable economic power
– Joint ventures and trade associations not formed to fix prices or divide markets
– Joint ventures in the research and development of new technology
Sherman Act Section 2: Monopoly
Company has 70%+ market share = monopoly
Company has < 40% market share = not a monopoly
Company has 40% - 70% market share = may or may not be monopoly
Sherman Act Section 2: Illegal Monopoly
Courts require two elements to establish an illegal monopoly
- Monopoly power, and
- Achieve the power unfairly or abuse the power once achieved
Sherman Act Section 2 & Patents
A patent grants a limited monopoly to the patent holder.
The patent holder can sell item at whatever price without violating the Sherman Act
Sherman Act Enforcement
– Justice Department can file criminal and civil actions in federal court
- Violations are felonies and may be punished by fines and imprisonment - injunctions prohibiting violations - Compel divestiture of subsidiaries - Canceling contracts - Divide the company's assets to create a competing entity.
– States can also bring suits on behalf of the citizens for treble damages.
– Infividuals can bring civil suit to recover treble damages and attorney fees
- Must show direct injury caused by anti-competitive behavior
– Participants in anti-competitive behavior case cannot sue
Clayton Act: Purpose
Clayton Act aims to stop anticompetitive behaviours in the incipiency (i.e. stop them before they become Sherman Act violations)
Clayton Wct civil in nature
Clayton Act: Relevant Sections
Section 2 – Price-fixing
Section 3 – Exclusive dealing contracts and tying arrangements
Section 7 – Mergers & Acquisitions
Section 8 – interlocking directorates
Clayton Act Section 2 – price-fixing
Altered by Robinson-Patnam act
Applies to price discrimination of commodities of like grade and quality
Does not cover price discrimination involving services, real estate, or intangibles
Prohibits sellers and buyers from price discrimination it substantially lessons competition attends to create a monopoly
Prohibits buyers from inducing and sellers from granting discounts of any type
Types of Anti-competitive effects
Primary-line injury = injuries to a seller’s competitors
Secondary-line injury = injuries to seller’s customers
Tertiary-line injury = injury to customers of a seller’s customer
Defenses to Section 2 of the Clayton Act
Cost justification – passing cost savings onto customers
– Discount must be given to all buyers in that group
Changing conditions
Meeting (but not beating) competition
Clayton Act Section 3 – Exclusive dealing contracts and tying arrangements
Tying arrangements are illegal if seller has a considerable amount of economic power in the tying product market
Exclusive dealing arrangements = seller of goods requires the buyer to promise not to dealing goods of a competitor
– Clayton Act violation if it tends to create monopoly or substantially lessons competition