R6.1 – Contracts Flashcards
(46 cards)
Sources of Contract Law
1. Common Law – Developed in judicial decisions on contracts – Applies to – Real estate – Insurance – Services – Employment
- Uniform Commercial Code – Codified in statutory form
– Article 2 applies to contracts for the sale of goods (moveable things)
Contract Defined
Contract =
- an agreement
- supported by consideration
- between two or more persons
- with competent capacity
- for a legal purpose that the law will enforce
Types Of Contracts – Method of Formation
Express contract = contract formed by language, oral and/or written
Implied-in-fact contract = formed by conduct of parties
Quasi-contract or implied-in-law contract = a remedy imposed by a court to prevent unjust enrichment
Types of Contracts – Promises Made
Unliateral contract = promise for action
– Contract not formed until performance completed
BIlateral contracts = promise for promise
– Contract formed when promises exchanged
Types of Contracts – Stage of Performance
Executed Contract = fully performed by all parties to contract
Executory contract = parties have not performed or only partly performed
Type of Contract – Valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts
Valid contract = legally formed and meets the necessary requirements for formation
Void contract = lack legal purpose or is in violation of the law
– Courts can’t enforce
Voidable contract = otherwise valid contract that can be set aside by one party
– Includes contracts that involved fraud in formation or the protected party lacked the required capacity to form contracts.
Unenforceable contract = otherwise valid contract that can not be enforced because of a statutory or other legal defense
– Court can not enforce but parties can still honor contract
Elements of a Contract
Agreements
– Offer
– Acceptance
Consideration
Lack of defenses
Offer – Requirements
- Intent to contract
- Definite and certain terms
- Communication of offer
Offer – Requirements: Definite and Certain Terms
- Offeree
- Subject matter
- Price to be paid
- Time of performance
- Quantity involved
- Nature of work to be performed
Offer – Termination
Termination by offeror (revocation)
Termination by offeree (rejection)
Operation of law
Offer – Termination by offeror (revocation)
Offeror can revoke offer at any time before offer is accepted
Effective when received by offeree (or when published)
Offer – Irrevocable Offers
Option contract = Promisor promises to keep offer open in exchange for consideration from promisee
– Offeror can’t withdraw offer during option period
Unilateral contract
– Offeror can’t revoke once offeree begins to perform
Merchant’s firm offers under UCC = UCC Article’s 2 form of option contract
– Can not be revoked by merchant
Requirements of merchant firm offer – In writing – Made by merchant – States that it will be kept open for a given amount of time (max 3 months) – Does not require consideration
Offer – Termination by offeree (rejection)
Methods of rejection
– Express rejection
– Counter offer = rejection of old offer and giving new offer
– Letting time lapse
Inquiry is not a reject or counteroffer
Rejection effective when received
Common law: mirror image rule
– Acceptance must mirror offer; any deviation is a counteroffer which includes a rejection
Offer – Termination by operation of the Law
Death or incompetence of parties prior to acceptance
– Does not have to be communicated to other party
– Does not terminate option contract
Termination by destruction of subject matter before acceptance
Termination by illegality – subject matter of contract becomes illegal
Acceptance
Only the offeree may accept
– Contracts are generally not assignable
– Exception: option contracts are assignable
Offeree’s silence is not acceptance
Must use reasonable method
– Unless otherwise stated, must use specified method
– If no method specified, acceptance effective when sent by any reasonable means
Mirror image rule
– Acceptance must be mirror image of the offer, except in contracts for the sale of goods
Mailbox rule
– Acceptance effective when dispatched as long as it is properly addressed
– Offeror can opt out of mailbox rule by including other conditions in offer
Consideration
Consideration = price of contracting
Both side of contract must be supported by legally sufficient considerations
– The law does not enforce gratuitous promise
Elements of consideration
– Legal value
– Adequate
– Bargained for exchange
Consideration – Legal Value
Legal value
= detriment to promisee and/or benefit to promisor
Doesn’t have to be monetary value
Doesn’t have to go to one of parties in contract
Can’t be something promisee already obligated to
– Preexisting duty rule - if already legally bound to perform, not adequate consideration
Consideration – Adequacy
Courts don’t generally inquire into adequacy of consideration
Key is whether value promised is legally sufficient so as not to be considered a gift
Consideration – Bargained for Exchange
Something is not consideration unless it was given in exchange for other consideration
Can’t claim more payment for what you are already legally obligated to do
Promissory estoppel
Promissory Estoppel – A promise made by one party and detrimentally relied upon by another can be enforced without consideration
Reliance on promise must be reasonable
Detriment occurred due to reliance on promise
Defenses
Defenses can make a contract void or unenforceable
9 types of defenses to formation of contract
- Mistake
- Fraud
- Innocent misrepresentation
- Duress
- Undue Influence
- Capacity
- Statute of Frauds
- Issues with Performance
- Unconscionability
Defenses – Mistake
Unilateral mistake = mistake by 1 of the parties
Mutual mistake = mistake by both parties
Unilateral Mistake binding on mistaken party unles
– Other party knows or should have known of mistake, or
– Mistake is material and obvious, or
– Error is due to mathematical calculation made inadvertently and not through gross negligence
Mutual mistake cant be enforced if mistake involves – identity – existence, or – amount of subject matter = Void contract
Mistakes as to value = enforceable contract
Defenses – Fraud
Must prove
- Misrepresentation of a material fact
- Scienter – intent to defraud or reckless disregard of truth
- Intent to induce plaintiff’s reliance
- Actual and justifiable reliance by plaintiff
- Damages
Opinions or statements of value do not constitute facts to be reasonably relied upon unless made by experts
Fraud in the execution = Party deceived into signing something that he does not know is a contract
– Void contract
Fraud in the inducement = Party aware signing contract but terms are materially misrepresented
– Voidable contract
Defenses – Innocent Misrepresentation
Innocent misrepresentation = same as fraud but no scienter
- Misrepresentation of a material fact
- Intent to induce plaintiff’s reliance
- Actual and justifiable reliance by plaintiff
- Damages