Quizzam #2 Flashcards
Semantics
Learning & storage of word meanings
Mental Lexicon
Volume of words understood (receptive) and used (expressive)
- Receptive = LT expressive
- Kids acquire ~860 words/ yr ages 1-7
Relationship btwn semantics & syntactic dev.
They’re H interrelated
-INC words = INC syntax
Semantic Taxonomy
How semantics are categorized. 5:
- specific nominals
- general nominal
- Action word
- modifiers
-PERS - SOC words
How do kids learn new words?
-Repition, ~7
-Exposure via media or other (parent, sibling, ect)
-Reading
-Reinforcement/BHVR
How Do Kids Learn New Words Cont. (STEPS)
1) Attntl focus at initial exposure
-Lead in > Adult labels something outside of kid’s attntl focus (may shift and support learning)
-Follow In> Adult labels object / event kid is attnding (M influential for vocab)
2) Context at Initial Exposure
-Ostensive > Lots of info given for new word (better for learning)
-Nonostensive > Given L context
3) Other Factors
-Imagineability > Concrete or abstract
-Extralinguistic Cue > Inflection, gestures, ect that STR linguistic input
-Phonological Form > Arbitrary VS onomatopoeic (predictable sound combo)
Pragmatic Dev aspects
-Lang use for different comm functions
-Dev convo skills
-Gaining sensitivity to extralinquistic cues
Extralinguistic Cues
-Posture, gesture
-Face expr, eye contact
-proximity
-Gained sensitivity to extralinquistic cues
Convo Schema
Pragmatic Dev is important
-Initial est. Of topic
-Navigation of series of contingent turns maintaining topic shift
The Theories of Lang and Learning
Nature: Universal grammar and Lang Acquisition Device (LAD)
Nurture: Skinner,
Interactionist: Vygotstky
COG: Piaget
Chomsky’s Universal Grammar Th
All world langs consistently have a system of grammar rules
Lang Acquisition Device (LAD)
Kids born w/ basic grammar rules
-Lang and its interpretation and use is free creation constrained by generation used infinitely and freely varied.
Skinner nurture th. and lang
Learning caused by operant conditioning, Bhvr rein = STR, bhvr punish = WK
-We aren’t born w/ lang-COG
*Tabula Rasa - Blank slate
Vygotsky’s Interactionist Theory and lang
Kids learn via SOC interaction & COG dev is propelled forward
Zone of Proximal Dev. - Diff btwn kid’s actual dev. lvl and their potential lvl W/ SUPPORT
-What learner can do (too easy) INC w/ time and support. INC = tasks H
-ZoPD
-What learner can’t doo, is too hard
Piaget’s COG Dev Th. and Lang
Kids go through stages of Dev., one must occur before another
-COG achievement needed for lang to emerge
-kid must be active in constructing understanding of lang