Quiz #1 Flashcards
What is Ethics?
1) The reasoned study of rules of right and wrong
2) The study of obligations to others, concerned with obligations beyond yourself and how they arise
Why study Ethics?
The decision does not always have an obvious solution ex. The Golden Rule “do one to others as you would have them do to you”
What is business ethics?
The reasoned study of rules of right and wrong pertaining to the realm of business, which includes individuals, firms and markets
What is a moral dilemma?
1) arises when you have to chose between actions, and someone’s welfare will be significantly harmed no matter what action you take
What is Prudence?
Making thoughtful, wise choices, implicitly ones that improve personal welfare, (ex. Focuses on self-interest) sometimes prudence and ethics are in alignment.
What is the difference between Moral, Immoral and Amoral Actions?
Moral - “right” actions in accordance with the decision rule of some defensible ethical approach
Inmoral - “wrong” actions that violate ethical view point
Amoral - neither right or wrong (outside realm of given decision rule)
What are the steps in the generic decision making model? Which apply to moral rules?
- Define problem **
- Determine criteria for solution **
- Generate potential actions **
- Evaluate potential actions **
- Choose Solution **
- Implement solution
- Monitor solution
- Reassess problem
What is John Stuart Mill’s approach to ethics?
Utilitarism/Common Morality
1) That it is widely known conceptualization of morality
2. That its proponents mean for it to be commonly applied potentially providing insight to any moral dilemma
What is mills rule?
The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, utility or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to reverse happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privatization of pleasure.
What is the greatest happiness principle?
“Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness.
Explain the three vocabulary words from Mill’s Rule. (Creed, utility and privation)
Creed - code of behaviour or a set of beliefs
Utility - anything that makes you happy has utility (measure of pleasure)
Privation - not having pleasurable experiences
How does Mill speak of Happiness and Pleasure? What questions did this lead to? What did Critics accuse Mill of being?
Mill equates happiness with pleasure
This leads to two questions:
1. Aren’t happiness and pleasure synonyms?
2. Lots of animals seek pleasure - “the swine objections”
This lead critics to accuse Mill of being a hedonist (idea developed by a greek philosopher Epicurus that humans were created to seek gratification of sensual desires such as food, drink, sex, drugs and music.)
What three points did Mill bring forward to the swine objection? What exactly is the swine objection?
The swine objection is the allegation that utilitarism is a form of hedonism
Mill believed this was a false accusation because:
1. There are two types of pleasure - Physical pleasure (which satisfies the five sense, food drink and sex, this describes the part that would refer to as hedonist behaviour or “animal appetites”) and Psychological pleasure (mental pleasure, intellectual, imagination, satisfaction, pride, the human capacity for mental pleasure outdistances animals)
2. One type is of higher quality than the other - mental pleasures are superior to physical pleasures “no intelligent human would trade lives with a fool” ex. Trade life with someone of lower IQ
3. Human happiness involves the higher one - because psychological pleasures are superior to physical human happiness relise heavily on them
Does happiness mean you are always happy and nothing bad happens?
Happiness is not like a coke commercial - happiness is made up of few and transitioning pains, many and various pleasures
Whose happiness and pleasure is John Stuart Mill referring to?
“Actions should promote the happiness of society not the individual taking action” (the greatest amount of happiness together)
Why everyone?
1) Utter selfishness could not possibly by adopted by all rational beings (personal happiness would never get anyone else to accept)
2) Living in society’s is natural for us - utilitarianism analysis considers everyone equally in its moral rule
We must think of everyone who may be significantly affected by our action, make sure happiness is going to improve overall.