Questions Flashcards
Unlike Northern Canada, where the weather is quite cold, the temperature in Florida rarely goes below freezing.
- Comparison Marker: Unlike
- It’s illogical to compare the location (Canada) vs. temperature
The retail sector has shrunk by a staggering margin each of the past five years, posting annual losses of at least 5 percent or more compared with the previous year
- each of the past five years = annual ⇒ Redundant Words
- At least 5 percent = 5 percent more ⇒ Redundant
Many people believe that crime is on the rise but that, despite what is depicted on television, crim is actually at its lowest rate in decades
vs,
Contrary to what many people believe and what is depicted on television, crime is at its lowest rate in decades
- People can believe in contradicatory theories, however, the right conjuction word to use would be “AND” to connect two ideas
- Why I thought Contratry might be wrong: Contraty (comparison conjuction): “what many people believe….” is a fact that could be compared with the other factor “Crime is at its lowest rate in decades”
The teacher is confident her students mastered the lessons.
Is this correct? Anything Wrong?
“That” is missing, which is incorrect in GMAT because sometimes it caused ambiguity of meaning.
Correct: The teacher is confident that her students mastered the lessons.
Which of the following is correct?
- I listen to Earth, Wind & Fire; Wow, Owls; and Blood, Sweat & Tears
- I listen to Earth, Wind & Fire, Wow, Owls, and Blood, Sweat & Tears
1 is correct
Is this correct? Anything Wrong? How to correct it?
The sports governing body recently revamped the rules about hits to the head, a change intented to increase player safety, ever since then palyers have, somewhat paradoxcally, suffered more concussions.
Error: Connect two independent clauses with a comma only. “Ever since then….Players have…” is an independent claus
Is this correct? Anything Wrong? How to correct it?
Although the narrow loss after a long and gruelling campaign was disappointing, Governor Schudter and her family are considering whether to run for Governor again next election.
Governor Schudter is the only one running for election, not her family…Thus “and” is illogical
Something was disappointing….is correct
The petroleum distillates were so viscous, the engineers had to heat the pipe by nearly 30 degrees.
Error: Two indepnedent causes are connected with only a comma (Run-ON)
Fix: 1) The petroelum distillates were so viscous THAT the engineers had to heat the pipe by nearly 30 degrees.
2) The petroleum distillates were EXTREMELY viscous; AS A RESULT, the engineers had to heat the pipe by nearly 30 degrees.
3) It’s important to shift SO to EXTREMELY as “so….that…”
Which one is wrong and why?
- Max’s great grandmother, from whom he inherited his curly hair, is supposed Irish ancestor.
- Max’s great-grandmother, from whom he inherited his curly hair, is his supposedly Irish ancestor
Modifier comparison: Supposed vs. Supposedly
Supposed is an adj. modifying ancestor while supposedly is an adv. modifying adj. Irish
Max’s great-grandmother is his relations, so she is by definition his ancetor. Only the second option has a sensible meaning.
Crime has recently decreased in our neighborhood, which has led to a rise in property values.
Is there anything wrong about the sentence? How to correct it?
Thi’s incorrect. “, which” has to modify a very nearby noun (neighborhood). The meaning is not sensible.
Correction: Crime has recently decrease in our neighborhood, leading to a rise in property values. ⇐ comma ing modifies an action
Happy abouy his raise, Bill’s celebration included taking his friends to dinner. Anythign wrong? Why?
Possessive nouns (Bill’s) are technically adjuectives, not nouns. And it stands, the sentence technically says that Bill’s celebration is happy about his raise, which is not sensible.
We had an arrangement where he cooked and I cleaned.
Anything wrong? How to correct it if it is?
Correct: We had an arrangement in which he cooked and I cleaned.
Exhausted from her job, she has red hair.
Anything wrong?
A sentence with the opening modifier (exhausted from her job) doesn’t have anything to do with the fact that she has red hair, is not accepted in GMAT
Both comma -ing and comma -ed modifiers have to make sense (has a logical meaning) with the whole clause that they modify
The CEO declared that everyone had to work through the holidays to make the production deadline, but in calling for such an extreme measure, the company’s employees were upset to the point of mutiny.
Anything wrong?
As the modifier “in calling for…” falls after the conjuction (but) connecting the two clauses, the modifier refers to the second part of the sentence - the employees
George Carlin, both shocking and entertaining audiences across the nation, who also struggled publicly with drug abuse, influenced and inspired a generation of comedians.
Anything wrong? How to improve it?
“Shocking and entertaining….” adverbial modifier, which modifies “influenced and inspired a generation of comedians”
“who also…” noun modifier, which better be closer to what it modifies: “George Carlin”
Better: George Carlin, who also struggled publicly with drug abuse, infuenced and inspired a generation of comedians, both shocking and entertaining audiences across the nation.
Citizens of many countries are expressing concern about the environmental damage - such as flooding and wildfires - caused by the widespread release of greenhouse gases may be impossible to reverse.
Anything Wrong? How to fix it if it’s wrong?
“May be impossible to reverse” is a wrong modifier as the subject is “Citizens of many…expressing concern” rather than environmental damage
“Environmental damage” is a part of a prep phrase (about the environmental damage”. Nouns in prep phrase cannot also be subjects.
Correct: Citizens of many countries are expressing concern that the environmental damage - such as flooding and wildfires - caused by the widespread release of greenhouse gases may be impossible to reverse.
This’s a subject-verb-THAT-subject verb sentence structure:
- The main clause is: “Citizens…expressing concern”
- Sub clause starts with “that” modifies the main clause
Citizens of many countries are expressing concern about the environmental damage - such as flooding and wildfires - caused by the widespread release of greenhouse gases, damage that may be impossible to reverse.
Anything wrong? Why?
Correct.
Sub clause: “that may be impossible to reverse” modifies the main clause, which is far away ⇒ Thus, it’s OK to add “, damage” before the sub clause
In addition, there’re too many nouns before the sub clause.
We have less than 20 dollars. Anything wrong? How to fix it?
Use less with unit nouns when you really want to indicate something about the underlying quantity.
In general, we can’t use less for countable nouns.
Most legislators - including much in the governor’s own party - realize that the governor’s budget would imperil the state’s finances, nontheless, the budget is likely to be approved, because few legislators want to anger voters by cutting spending or raising taxes.
Anything wrong about the sentence above? How to fix it?
Most legislators - including much in the governor’s own party - realize that the governor’s budget would imperil the state’s finances_, nontheless,_ the budget is likely to be approved_, because_ few legislators want to anger voters by cutting spending or raising taxes.
- many not much as legislators are countable pronouns
- , nontheless, use smicolon to connect two independent sentences (clauses) as “nontheless” is neither a co-conjuction or sub-conjuction. A way to fix it is “, yet”
- Because is correct as because is subordinating conjunction, therefore, it can be seperated from a main clause by a comma.
The popluation of San Antonio increased more than it did in any other U.S. city in 2016, adding almost 66 people per day.
- of San Antonio increased more than it did in any other U.S. city in 2016, adding almost
- increased more in San Antonio than it did in any other city in the United States in 2016, adding almost
- of San Antonio icnreased more than the population of any other U.S. city in 2016, almost adding
B)
The air conditioner broke in the middle of a heat wave, which caused great consternation.
Anything Wrong? How to fix it?
“which caused great consternation’ modifies heat wave, which is not sensible. Instead, the cause is the action “air conditioner broker in the middle of a heat wave” caused the consternation.
Correct: The air conditioner broke in the middle of a heat wave, causing great consternation.
The doctor analyzed her patients’ vital signs with a new device that simplified the process and logged the results in each patient’s electronic medical records.
Anything Wrong? How to fix it?
Open Parallelism Marker: And + logged
Element: analyzed or simplifed?
Option 1 root phrase: The doctor analyzed…and the doctor logged the results…
Option 2 root phrase: A device that simplified…and a device that logged the results..
Ambiguous meaning: Did the doctor log patient’s electronic medical records or did the new device log the results in each patient’s electronic medical records?
The baker looked at the wedding cake, which stood over four feet high, and beamed proudly.
Anything Wrong? What’s tested?
Two commas + and: Parallelism
Here, commas are used to offset the modifier: “which stood over four feet high”
looked parallel with beamed
When the sales manager gets wind of the recent slump, she likely will fire some members of the sales team and blame the marketing team.
Anything Wrong? What’s tested?
Correct. Open parallelism “And”
blame paralle to fire
I scored three goals in yesterday’s game, as did Suzanne.
Anything Wrong? Why?
Correct.
As signals Parallelism comparison. “Did” stands for the entire phrase “scored three goals”
The clothes looked more appealing inside the store than on the racks outside.
Anything Wrong? How to fix it?
Correct.
Parallelism Comparison: more…than…
This sentence compares how som clothes looked inside the store to how the same clothes looked on the racks outside.
It puts the phrase “inside the store” after the comparison signal more appealing, making the phrase available for a comparison with on the racks outside.
The clothes inside the store looked more appealing than on the racks outside.
Anything Wrong? How to fix it?
Correct: The clothes inside the store looked more appealing than did those on the racks outside.
- The company’s DIGITAL WATCH OFFERING is outperforming that of its competitor.
- The company’s DIGITAL WATCH OFFERING is outperforming those of its competitor.
- The company’s DIGITAL WATCH OFFERING is outperforming the offerings of its competitor.
Which one is correct? Which one is wrong? And Why?
First one is correct as “that” makes a new copy with a modifier “…of its competitor”
The second is incorrect as the new-copy usage of “those” don’t agree in number with the previous version.
The third one is correct without using pronoun.
This’s an exception to the general rule that a pronoun refers to a noun. It’s possible for a pronoun to to refer a possesive noun (The company’s)
The player’s helmets need to be repainted before they’re used in Sunday’s game.
Anything Wrong? Why? What’s tested? How to fix it?
Pronoun: They refers to helmets.
We don’t need to worry about “they” may refer players as there’s a structual pointer that they refers to helmet.
Structual pointer: Helmets and they are the subjects of their respective clauses.
Samantha took her laptop and her books with her on the airplane because she thought that she could use them to get some work done.
Anything wrong? What’s tested?
Her laptop and her books are antecedent of them.
When tetrapods developed lungs capable of surviving on land, they became the first amphibians.
(a) lungs capable of surviving on land, they became the first amphibians.
(b) lungs capable of surviving on land, tetrapods became the first amphibians
© lungs, they became the first amphibians capable of surviving on land
© Structual Pointer: Pronoun “they” refer to tetrapods. Since tetrapods and they are subjects of their respective clause, it reinforces the idea that they refers to tetrapods not lungs.
(a) & (b) The sentence seems to say that the lungs themselves were capable of surviving on land. However, “capable of surviving on land” is a noun modifier that describes the tetrapods.
The bite of the king cobra delivers such strong neurotoxins that they can kill an Asian elephant.
a) bite of the king cobra delivers such strong neurotoxins that they
b) king cobra’s bite delivers such strong neurotoxins that it
c) neurotoxins delivered by a king cobra’s bite are so strong that it
X (delivers) such Y that Z (occurs)
The Z and X elements can be the same thing, but Y and Z cannot be the same thing.
i.e. The bite of the king cobra delivers such strong neurotoxins that they can kill an Asian elephant.
X: bit of the king cobra
Y: strong nuerotoxins
Z: “they” refer to nuerotoxins
Z & Y are the same elements, which are not allowed
Television writer Aaron Sorkin is known for writing dialogue that is wittier than that in most real-world interactions.
a) dialogue that is wittier than that in
b) witteir dialogue than
c) dialogue that is wittier than it is in
a) Correct. Television writer Aaron Sorkin is known for writting dialogue that is wittier than the dialogue in most real-world interactions.
b) illogical comparison between dialogue and interactions
c) “it” can only refer the exact same thing. However, dialogue written specifically for a TV script is, by definition, not actual real-world dialogue.
She will walk to school in the morning and run home in the afternoon.
Anything Wrong? Why? How to correct it?
Correct.
Parallelism: “Run” is understood will run; will is part of the root phrase and applies to both verbs: walk and run
The band U2 was just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980s, but less than 10 years later, U2 had fully eclipsed its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
Anything Wrong? Why? How to Fix it?
Correct. Even though had eclipsed is not the earlist action in the entire sentence, it’s the earlier of the two actions in its indepndent clause.
“Had eclipsed” occured before the time marker “10 years later”
This complex construction is correct.
The child has drawn a square in the sand, but the ocean has erased it.
Anything Wrong? Why? How to fix it?
Incorrect because using the same tense for both actions implies that they took place at the same time.
The company will reimburse you when you have submitted your expense report.
Anything Wrong? What’s tested? How to fix it?
Correct. The word “when” can mean either “at the same time” or “after”. The use of perfect present tense eliminates any ambiguity.
The scientist announced that the supercollider was ready, that it had not cost too much to build, and that it would provide new insights into the workings of the universe.
Anything Wrong? Why? How to Fix it?
A sentence can make multiple different verb tenses parallel, as long as each verb tense is appropriate for the meaning of that part of the sentence.
NOTE: All of the tenses have to pair appropriately with the starting tense in teh root phrase, i.e. announced
Jason has decided next fall not to attend college.
Anything Wrong? How to fix it? Why?
It’s illogical to sy “decided next fall”. He either already decided (in the past) or he will decide next fall (in the future).
Correct: It has been decided by Jason that he will not attend college.
The shuttle launch took place flawlessly and was seen on television.
Anything Wrong? Why? How to Fix it?
Correct. You don’t have to make active or passive voice parallel throughout a sentence.
Water freezes if it were cooled to zero degrees Celsius.
a) freezes if it were
b) would freeze if it was
c) freezs if
a) The hypothetical were cooled should be followed by the hypothetical would freeze.
b) The past tense “was cooled” is factual, not hypothetical, so the logical outcome is that the water froze or water did freeze in the simple past tense.
c) The simple present tense both imply a general turth - a physical propert of water.
This question also tests: “If…Then”
Mozart, who died in 1791, lived in Salzburg for most of his life.
Mozrt, who died in 1791, had lived in Salzburg for most of his life.
Which one is correct? Which one is better? Why?
Both are correct. Simple past tense is better. No need to use perfect past tense as the sequence of past events (Mozart’s life and death) is obvious.
The editor of our local newpaper, who has earned much acclaim in her long career, has been awarded a Pulitzer Prize yesterday.
Anything Wrong? Why? How to fix it?
“has been awarded…” is wrong because time marker: yesterday told that the action occured at a specific time in the past.
Yesterday - Simple past tense
We are concerned about the forests, also the oceans.
We’re concerned about the forests and also the coeans.
Anything Wrong? What’s tested? How to fix it?
Idiom: concerned about…and…
First one is wrong: We’re concerned about the forests and the oceans.
Second one is suspect
As part of the arrangement, he received severance.
As a part of the arrangement, he received severance.
What’s the correct way of using “as”? Can you think of any other usages of as?
As part of not as a part of.
While being a child, I delivered newspaper.
Anything Wrong? How to Correct it?
“While being a child” should be replaced by “as a child”
Here, “as a child” means “in the stage of being”
As being a child, I delivered newspaper.
Anything Wrong? How to fix it? What’s tested?
As a child = in the stage of being
While in childhood, I delivered newspaper
As a child, I delivered newspaper.
as…expresses in the stage of being
He winds frequently, as much because he plays so hard as because he cheats.
Correct. Idio of a much…as..
He winds frequently, as much because he plays so hard as because he cheats.
Parts after because parallel
We have as many apples as there need to be cooked.
Wrong.
We have as many apples as need to be cooked.
Cheese is so great as people say.
Cheese is as great as people say.
Cheese is not so great as people say.
Cheese is not as great as people say.
We have so many apples as you.
We have as many as apples as you.
We have 10 apples, about equivalent to what we picked yesterday.
We have 10 apples, about as many as we picked yesterday.
His knowledge springs not from experience as from schooling.
His knowledge springs not so much from experience as from schooling.
We have as many or more apples than you.
We have as many apples as you.
We have more apples than you.
By shining, the sun makes plants grow.
Correct. By shining here express the meaning of because
Because the sun shines, plants grow.
Plants grow because the sun shines.
Because of the sun, plants grow.
Plants grow, for the sun shines. (Grammatically correct but very formal).
Plants grow because of the sun shining.
Correct: Because of the sun, plants grow.
Suspect: Plants grow because of the sun, which shines.
Because of + noun ⇐ sun here is the noun not sun shining
Plants are amaing in that they grow in the sun.
Correct but wordy.
The growth of plants is explained by the fact that the sun shines.
Correct but wordy.
I study hard but take break.
What’s the other way to say it when adding a comma?
I study hard, but I take break.
I study hard, but I take break.
What’s a more concise way to say it?
I study hard but take break.
Although I take frequent naps, I study effectively.
The other way to say it starts with Despite
Correct: Despite taking frequent naps, I study effectively.
Suspect: Despite that fact that I take frequent naps, I study effectively.
The manager has the capability of running the plant.
Wrong
Idiom: Capable of doing sth.
The manager is capable of running the plant.
The manager has the ability of running the plant.
UNDERLINED PART WRONG: The manager has the ability of running the plant.
The manager can run the plant.
The manager is capable of running the plant.
The manager has the ability to run the plant.
The plant has the possibility of causing damage.
Correct: The plant can cause damage.
Suspect: It is possible for the plant to cause damage
Suspect: The plant possibly causes the damage.
I consider illegal the law passed last week by the new regime.
Correct.
Idiom: Consider is tested.
As the subject: the law passed last week by the new regime is long. It can be replaced behind adj. illegal
The judge considers the law as illegal.
The judge considers the law illegal.
The judge considers the law as being illegal.
Suspect: The judge considers the law to be illegal.
The judget considers the law should be illegal.
The judge considers the law illegal.
The judge considers the law as being illegal.
The judge considers the law as if it were illegal.
The judge considers the law illegal.
The judge considers the law as being illegal.
There is an expecation the price will fall.
Suspect
Better way: The price is expected to fall.
There is an expectation that the price will fall.
She drank coffee for staying awake.
Wrong.
Correct: She drank coffee to stay awake.
Correct: She drank coffee in order to stay awake.
Coffee was drunken to stay awake.
Coffe was drunken in order to stay awake.
Wrong. The subject coffee is not trying to stay awake.
She drank coffee in oder that she might stay awake.
She drank coffee so that she might stay awake.
Suspect expression.
Correct/Better: She drinks coffee to (in order to) stay awake.
She drank coffee so as to stay awake.
Suspect.
Better: She drank coffee to stay awake.
Matt drives fast cars like his sister does.
Wrong.
Correct: Like his sister, Matt drives fast cars. ⇐ Both drives fast car.
Matt drives fast cars like his sister’s. ⇐ Both drives similar car.
Correct: Matt drives fast cars as his sister does.
A tomato is not a vegetable but rather a fruit.
Correct.
A totmat is not a vegetable but a fruit.
We were not only boots but sandals as well.
Suspect
We wore boots and also sandals.
Suspect
Matt trains in many ways such as by driving on racetracks.
Wrong usage of “such as”
Such as doing….