Quality Flashcards

1
Q

advantages of quality

A
  1. differentiate from rivals and strengthen brand image - add value with sustainable competitive advantage so increase prices and hence profit margins
  2. greater customer satisfaction - meeting their expectations so higher repeat purchases and customer loyalty, greater sales in LT
  3. reduces costs of paying compensation and customer returns - can keep prices low and competitive which increases sales
  4. promote positive word of mouth and recommendations - improves brand image and reputation and lowers marketing costs, increasing profits
  5. employee motivation - increase retention which reduces turnover and hence recruitment costs

*whenever saying higher revenue or lower costs will lead to higher profit, always throw in a quick condition - depending on if costs stay constant; depending on if revenues stay constant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what, in general, might be a barrier to quality?

A
  1. if firm is close to full capacity
  2. costs of quality VS benefits in that particular market (customer expectations)
  3. offshored/outsourced functions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does globalisation mean for quality?

A

customers being exposed to higher quality foreign products means there is more competitive pressure on domestic firms to meet their higher expectations of quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

quality assurance

A

setting quality standards for and designing quality into the product and all stages of the production, from design to distribution, to PREVENT defects.

Self-checking and culture of zero defects

QA: PREVENT, QC: DETECTION+REJECTION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the concept of quality chains?

A

each department carrying out a different function in the production process is thought of as being an internal customer to each other, and each department is responsible for meeting the quality expectations of their internal customer. Promotes accountability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

benchmarking

A

Comparing a business against the performance standards of the best businesses in the same industry to
identify areas that need to be improved to match their quality standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

pros of TQM

A

same as pros of QA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

pros of benchmarking

A
  1. more effective way of improving quality standards than without external comparisons (see what you’re up against) - ensures you are actually being more competitive which is more likely to increases sales and market share
  2. customer-centric approach to identify BPI - meeting needs ensures customer satisfaction thus higher loyalty and lower PED

BPI- benchmark performance indicators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

cons of benchmarking

A
  1. merely copying restricts innovation - may damage reputation if consumers see you as unoriginal, will not buy yours leading to lower sales and market share in the long run
  2. obtaining up to date info from other businesses may be hard
  3. costs of comparison excercise may not be outweighed by improvements made

1- can eval 1 by saying they may still buy if prices are lower as some consumers care more about this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

steps of benchmarking

A
  1. identify BPI based on customer needs
  2. measure performance in these areas
  3. identify best in the industry and use their BPI data to establish weaknesses
  4. set standards for improvement and change processes
  5. re-measure performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

quality control VS quality assurance

A

inspecting the end product to detect then reject defected products before they reach the consumer

meeting quality standards at ALL stages of production to build quality in, thus preventing defects from occurring in the first place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how can quality be assessed?

A

if a physical product - compare against standards for size, weight, durability

if a service - compare against qualitative indicators of how customers are dealt with, response times, number of errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe the QC process

A

inspect samples of the finished good at the end of the production process using inspectors, then reject defect before they reach customer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

compared to price competition, quality is a…

A

SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE! price cuts cannot be sustained due to price wars and costs not being covered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

pros of QC

A
  1. stop defects from reaching the consumer - higher levels of satisfaction for meeting expectations, thus increased repeat custom

OR will reduce the costs of replacements/compensation which increases profits

  1. minimise disruption to production - higher productivity which could reduce unit costs and thus prices

**do NOT say that QC will reduce wastage costs because the defects are still occurring! You can only reference the fact that compensation and refund costs will fall, or that the costs of negative publicity will fall

17
Q

cons of quality control

A
  1. inspection is monotonous - fatigued and work less effectively - miss defects so they reach consumers, which will reduce satisfaction and damage reputation
  2. reduces personal accountability for quality work - increase defects, which increases costs of wastage and hence reduces profits
  3. workers may resent inspectors so become demotivated - less committed to reducing defects OR may increase turnover and hence recruitment costs
  4. defects don’t reach customer but still occur - increases wastage costs, reducing margins

hard to identify source of defect and prevent it from occurring again -

18
Q

pros of QA

A

apart from general benefits of quality:

  1. job enrichment - inclusive as everyone is responsible for quality (Herzberg) - motivating so lower labour turnover
  2. identify source of quality issues and improve so fewer defects occur - reduce wastage costs, keep prices low and increase competitiveness
  3. lower cost than QC - no external inspector/engineers so frees up cash to invest in xyz which could lead to _______
  4. having QA framework can gain accreditation like ISO 9000 - market to differentiate and add value, thus charge premium prices and increase margins
19
Q

eval: QA or QC?

A

both! QA better as it is more effective by targeting the root of quality issues and preventing defects from ocurring, but sometimes QA systems can fail so QC can catch defects that slip by

20
Q

definition of quality

A

Not necessarily using the highest quality materials to the highest standards, but meeting customer’s expectations and fulfilling a product’s intended purpose.

Quality is always relative to the product’s price and consumer expectations.

21
Q

cons of QA

A
  1. cost of training to follow quality processes - may force prices to be increased thus reducing sales and market share
  2. slows down production as standards need to be met at every stage - lower productivity could increase unit costs thus reduce margins
  3. **resistance **if employees don’t want additional responsibility - reduce motivation, so less committed to high quality and increases defects

** important: NEVER say an increase in price WILL reduce sales revenue as this depends entirely on PED. Better to say SALES fall (volume)

22
Q

benchmarking eval

A
  1. is not one-off - continuous process in dynamic business environment
  2. workforce participation is important - creativity and motivation
  3. depends on availability of info (some firms less transparent about processes)
  4. whether this provides any benefit would depend on how different the business actually is compared to the best performing firms - if very close, not much to improve so cost will not justify benefit
23
Q

TQM

A

cultural approach to quality that involves all employees and departments in quality improvement, promoting individual accountability for the quality of their own work and promoting ‘zero defects’

uses quality chains - idea of internal customers

** key to understand that TQM involves ALL departments and not just operations

24
Q

pros of TQM

A
  1. defects less likely to occur - increase quality and customer satisfaction, and repeat purchase and loyalty
  2. differentiate from rivals - competitive advantage that adds value, so can charge premium price and increase margins
  3. increase employee motivation with job enrichment - all are responsible so may increase job satisfaction and retention thus lower recruitment costs

OR increase employee motivation - which increases job satisfaction and retention (AN) BUT some may resent extra responsibility so demotivated and less committed (DAN)

25
Q

cons of TQM

A
  1. cost of training - may force higher prices which reduces sales and market share
  2. time to develop TQM culture
  3. employee resistance towards extra responsibility - demotivation so less productivity
26
Q

TQM eval

A
  1. only works if EVERYONE is committed to idea
  2. only works if management is democratic and willing to empower workforce with authority to check the quality of their work
  3. requires significant culture change - only LT results as employees need to readjust their entire approach to work
  4. appropriate training must be given to every worker to ensure they understand the commitment and change in attitude required, and to reduce uncertainty and resistance to change
27
Q

eval for improving quality in general (all methods)

A
  1. benefits outweigh costs in the LR with a stronger brand image and sustainable source of competitive advantage compared to prices
  2. is important in increasingly globalisaed markets
  3. consumers expect higher quality due to better info online
  4. higher incomes will raise consumer expectations of quality