QL - W4 - Narrative Inquiry (ch.12) Flashcards
Overview of Narrative inquiry - Features - Types - Analysis - Challenges and Issues Compare and contrast approaches
What is a good example of narrative inquiry?
Truth and Reconciliation (Indigenous)
Narrative Inquiry differs from phenomenology (lived experiences) in that…
- the narrative is told and lead by the participant (no probing questions by the researcher)
- Role of researcher = LISTEN to the story. (so start with “grand tour” and let the participant do the talking)
- Story telling
Describe what others say about narrative inquiry
- democratic form of research
- fluid method of communication
- it’s all about the stories of people and making a narrative out of their stories
What are the 4 features of N.I?
1 - collect stories of lived/told experiences
2 - chronology is ensured through re-storying AFTER the interview. Context is super imp.!
3 - often have “turning points”
4 - stories come from specific situations/places
How do researchers make a chronology?
True of False:
“narrative” and “story” are used interchangeably
True (sometimes not, but in this class, yes)
How do narratives apply in health care?
- professional knowledge generation
- explores the voice of the patient (challenge is hard to truly listen to the pt in clinical setting?)
- can be from pts, family and care providers, colleagues and professionals (illness or professional narratives)
How do narratives benefit patients
- allows for healing
- is pt focused
What are the 2 dimensions of narrative?
- chronological (or sequential)
- non-chronological
** Sometimes chronology isn’t always important – but sometimes it is! If it is, researcher role is to ensure chronology through re-storying
How many types of stories are there, and what are they?
FIVE
1 - everyday 2 - autobiographical 3 - biographical 4 - cultural 5 - collective
***** read more!
How would you develop a narrative research question?
- it is NOT the question you ask the participant (ie. the grand tour)
- go really broad
- Usu. see “narrative” or “stories” in the research Q. If it says “lived experiences”, then NOT narrative (cuz it implies that there are probing questions involved)
Example: What is the perspective/stories of the people who are homeless? What lead homeless people to become homeless?
What are the main forms of narratives?
Restitution (like an underdog story - coming back on top; popular in Western culture)
Chaos (bad all the time; no structure/order; hard to re-story) ie. maximum prison
Quest (emancipation; changed despite chronic illness; wanna help others through story) ie. Terry Fox
How is interviewing done in narrative inquiry?
“remembering is subjective”
- “grand tour” question needs to trigger a lengthy tale
- participant takes control
- little interruption/involvement by the researcher (this is the MAIN DIFFERENCE B/W PHENOMENOLOGY!!)
N.I. Analysis:
What is restorying?
RESTORYING
Can choose to analyze…
- themes (what was being said)
- structure (the nature of telling the story)
- dialogue/performance (who the story is directed to)
W/out researcher restorying, the participant is just telling a story. It’s not research. So researcher is continually discussing pt story with pt to shape the restory
N.I. Analysis:
What is transcription and reduction?
**
N.I Analysis:
What is visual analysis?
focus = stories told through visual images
(ie. Photographs, painted work, sculptures, film, theatre)
can include photovoice: ie. visual montage (makes people feel heard)
N.I. Analysis:
What is participant validation?
aka member checking!
**
“insider view”
**
Name some of the issues and challenges with using narrative research?
- “Truth” and self-selection
- Overuse and uncritical acceptance
- Active collaboration with participant necessary
- Reflection by researcher for how they “restory”
(Being mindful or own bias, reflexivity, being aware of what you are bringing into the process)
What is most important in narrative analysis?
CONTEXT of the story
What are the main steps of analysis?
- transcribing data
- reducing data
ie. from a bunch of data to 4 themes (thematic/holistic)
N.I. analysis:
“the narrative is analyzed as a whole, with main statements reflecting the core experience, which is of great value. What is said is more important than how it was said”
This type of restorying analysis is…
Thematic/holistic analysis
*thematic = Reissman (2008)
N.I. analysis:
“how story is told is most important. It’s more detailed. there are 6 elements to breaking down the story to analyze parts. This was developed by Labov and Waletzky (1967)”
This type of restorying analysis is…
Structured analysis
SIX elements:
- abstract (summary)
- orientation (considers time, place, etc. context)
- complicating action (plot; sequence of events leading up to crisis)
- evaluation (story appraisal; what it means to pt)
- resolution (outcome of plot; what happened?)
- coda (returning to the present time)
N.I. analysis:
“considered a hybrid of different types of analysis, this focuses on social relationships and identities that are co-constructed with others. Interactive talk, mime, gestures and other interaction elements are looked at. Focus is on text and context”
This type of restorying analysis is…
Dialogical/performance analysis
similar to thematic, structural and conversation/discourse analysis