QB Notes - Regulations, Ethics, Current Issues & Managing/Accepting Engagements SFQs Flashcards

1
Q

safeguards for familiarity?

A

reassess the composition of the safeguards

rotate partners

sell shares

remove from engagement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

who’s responsible for preventing fraud?

A

management are responsible for detecting fraud amongst their employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why is fraud hard to detect?

A

deliberate attempt to conceal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

auditor’s primary role in an audit?

A

to ensure FSs are free from material misstatement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how do management handle fraud?

A

implement controls to ensure prevention

create a culture that inspires ethical behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

who’s responsible for calculating a company’s valuation?

A

management

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the procedures when money laundering is suspected?

A

contact MLRO (money laundering reporting officer)

MLRO will then contact the NCA (national crime agency)

contact ethics partner

do not tip off the client

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

fees threshold for listed & non listed companies?

A

listed companies - 5% review safeguards, 10% decline engagement

non-listed companies - 10% review safeguards, 15% decline engagement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what happens to the engagement partner’s tenure when a client goes public?

A

if they’ve been the partner for >4 years, 2 years max before they must rotate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how long until engagement partners must be rotated for listed clients?

A

5 years max, sometimes extended to 7 by the audit committee

reasons must be documented if the engagement partner continues to TCWG

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

5 codes of ethics for auditors and their meaning?

A

integrity - be truthful and honest

objectivity - stay unbiased

pro behaviour - comply with laws & regs

pro competence & due care - maintain skills & act diligently

confidentiality - protect client information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

hot review?

A

review conducted before the audit report is finalised

typically conducted by an experienced audit partner who isn’t involved in the engagement

focuses on the adequacy of audit evidence, compliance w/ standards, accuracy of judgements, ensuring risks were addressed etc

helps ensure that errors or deficiencies are handled before the audit report is finalised and published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

cold review?

A

a review conducted after the engagement has finished and the audit report is published

used to assess the quality of the audit work that was conducted to identify areas of improvement

usually carried out by quality control team or independent partner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

staff appraisals?
why/when are they needed?

A

meetings with a member of staff

needed when a junior member’s work/performance requires evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

responsibilities/rights of an auditor once removed by their client?

A

rights = to make written reps to & request directors to circulate this to members/shareholders, to speak at meetings, to know reasons why

responsibility = to return all books/docs, prepare statement of circumstances, maintain confidentiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how often must audit partners be rotated for listed/non listed clients?

A

5 years for listed & cooling off period for 2 years before re-engaging

10 years for non listed (not mandatory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

why do management require a background check prior to engagement acceptance?

A

to ascertain management integrity

understand risk of harmful behaviour (e.g., intimidation, limitation of information, overdue fees risk, fraudulent/criminal activity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

when are business relationships allowed?

A
  • ordinary course of business
  • arms length transaction
  • immaterial for both parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

can audit staff be involved in preparation of client’s FSs?

A

no, management threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

safeguards when providing audit & non-audit services to a client?

A

separate engagement teams

non-disclosure agreements or confidentiality agreements

separate team locations/offices if possible

ethics partner to review effectiveness of safeguards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

can auditors provide non-audit services to listed/non-listed clients?

A

listed clients - prohibited, cannot provided non-audit services

non-listed clients - not prohibited, can provide non-audit services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

brydon’s report suggestions?

A

redefine audit’s purpose

increase use of technology

replace true & fair, with present fairly in all material aspects

fraud awareness training for auditors

resilience & public interest statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

in short, what were the suggestions by brydon, kingman and the CMA?

A

brydon - focus on audit quality
kingman - focus on audit regulation
CMA - focus on audit market

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

kingman’s review suggestions?

A

regulate big firms

require rapid explanations

larger sanctions for corporate failures

issue public reports detailing audit firms’ performance

25
CMA review suggestions?
mandatory joint audits 5 year progress review by the regulator operational split between audit and non-audit parts of big 4 firms robust regulatory oversight committee to ensure quality
26
CMA = ?
competition and market authority
27
criticisms of audit in recent times?
lack of auditor independence lack of audit quality lack of separation between big 4's audit & non-audit businesses lack of pro scepticism non-audit services being provided to clients big 4 dominance/lack of competition
28
who wanted to introduce ARGA?
kingman they want to really clamp down on the regulation of big 4 firms after a host of large-scale corporate failures in recent times (e.g., BHS, carillon etc)
29
what money laundering procedures can audit firms implement?
hire an MLRO hire an MLCP register w/ supervisory body monitor compliance w/ laws & regs train staff to not tip off clients and report money laundering
30
how can audit firms prevent self-interest from ownership of client shares amongst the engagement team?
firm writes up an up-to-date list of clients get written confirmations from employees regular training disciplinary action for breaches remove staff from engagements ensure disclosure upon hiring
31
who wants to extend auditing beyond the scope of the FSs and into internal controls also?
brydon
32
what must be done when auditors are removed by client from an engagement?
auditors should circulate written reps to TCWG/members auditors have right to speak at general meetings auditors must remain confidential must obtain permission to speak to new auditors must maintain confidentiality must return books/docs must prepare statement of circumstances to companies' house
33
fraud prevention is who's duty?
management/directors by promoting fraud prevention, implementing adequate controls and monitoring the system
34
how must suspected bribery be handled?
bribery's a criminal act under bribery act 2010 which is global in scope must be reporting to NCA
35
how does the acceptance of non-audit work impair audit quality?
remuneration can't be based on selling non-audit services objectives of engagement team cant be selling non-audit services impairs objectivity (self-interest threat) criteria for staff evaluation can't be selling of non-audit services
36
what is opinion shopping and why is it bad?
opinion shopping is when a company goes from auditor to auditor in pursuit of a clean/unqualified opinion indicates a lack of management integrity gives rise to self interest threat amongst auditors trying to secure the client threat to auditors' professional behaviour
37
what must be stated in an other assurance engagement letter? specifically engagement for a review of cash flow forecasts
to whom the review will be available period covered & scope of work disclaimer that forecast may differ to actual outcomes ensure correct FR framework state director's responsibilities establish limited auditor liability state intended use of cash
38
how must junior auditors be handled by senior auditors?
brief juniors on client and industry hold meetings to facilitate questions provide feedback monitor their work to ensure alignment with audit plan address contentious matters introduce audit team to the client
39
auditors must renew engagement covenants when...
client shows confusion/misinterpretation change in ownership, size or senior management change in laws/regs or professional standards change in engagement partner
40
engagement quality reviewer must be...
independent experienced with the specific clients in the specific industry must be qualified and competent with audit experience must have communicative access to all parties
41
how to gain an understanding of new/prospective clients?
internet searches undertake client identification procedures inspect prior year audit report hold discussions w/ directors search relevant databases e.g., companies house obtain references from 3rd parties
42
what factors play a role in audit fees?
seniority/experience of staff risk associated w/ the work inherent risk involved in the client/their industry complexity of their operations importance of work to client travelling expenses involved resources required whether auditor's expert is required extent to which internal audit team can be relied upon expenses involved
43
distinctive factors of other assurance engagements?
limited assurance negatively expressed opinion engagement conducted in accordance with ISAE's and ISREs
44
lack of management integrity indicates...
potential window dressing / aggressive accounting practices poor control environment restriction of access to necessary info (intimidation) unreliable management operations money laundering / criminal activity possibility
45
is EQR only for listed/high risk clients?
yes AKA hot review conducted during the engagement / before the audit report is finalised
46
EQR involves...
discuss significant matters w/ engagement partner review proposed auditor's report evaluation of proposed auditor's report
47
cold review purpose?
ensures compliance with standards & regs (e.g., ethical standard, ISAs etc) identify areas requiring improvements
48
which ISA requires engagement letters?
ISA (UK) 210
49
purpose of engagement letters?
indicate auditor and management responsibilities to avoid confusion and expectations gap
50
emphasis of matter paragraphs? other matter paragraphs?
EOM = area of the FS that auditors want users to pay attention to & place emphasis on OM = area that is relevant to users but not directly related to the FS
51
risks associated with clients expanding their operations overseas?
- accurate translation of currency - language barrier - adequate resources - adequate management - appropriate controls
52
difference between audits and other assurance engagements?
- level of assurance (reasonable vs limited) - type of opinion (positive vs negative) - reasonable = high, but not absolute assurance - limited = reduce risk to an acceptable level - 'FS provide true & fair view' vs 'no reason to disbelieve' = less bullish
53
risks of taking on a new client?
- inherent risk - lacking intimate knowledge of their systems - lacking certainty over their opening balances
54
risks when client is in a niche industry?
- threat to pro competence & due care - may require auditor's expert - need to know laws & regs of the industry - higher risk of non-compliance - industry may be heavily regulated - increases client risk - may deter us from accepting the engagement
55
do external audits include auditing subsequent events?
yes
56
threats arising from auditing a client for numerous years?
familiarity threat
57
how do auditors reduce risk when providing a review for financial info?
- provide disclosures to reduce liability
58
why is management integrity important?
lack of integrity may indicate - aggressive accounting policies - fraud - dishonesty - windowdressing - concealing information - intimidation - overdue fees
59
how do you gauge management integrity?
- internet searches - interview w/ management - contact 3rd parties - contact previous auditor (upon client permission) - search companies' house