pyschology Flashcards
how many participants are in milgram
40 male
age of the participants in milgram
ages 20-50
where was milgram study conducted
new haven America
what occupation did the participants in milgram study do
various occupations eg salesman
how many participants where in sperry study
11 spilt brain participants
what surgery did sperrys participate undergo
hemisphere disconnection
who did freud observe
little Hans
what was the age if little Hans during the study
ages 3-5
how participants did bandora at el have
72
36 boys 36 girls
where was the participants from bandoras study from
stanford university in California
age of the participants in bandoras study
ages 3-5
participants in bocchiaros pilot study
92 vu university students
participants in bocchiaros main study
149 under graduates
what was the participants in the main study of bocchiaros studies given for completing the study
£7 or course credit
how many participants in bocchiaros predicting task
138
how many participants in chaneys study
32 participants
22males 10 females
ages of participants in chaneys study
ages 1 1/2 to 6
who gave consent in chaneys
the children parents
how did the self reports get conducted in chaneys study
questionnaire and phone interviews
loftus and palmer findings
smashed condition estimated speed of 40.8mph compared to contacted which was 31.8
loftus and palmer 2 study findings
16 smashed participants said they saw broken glass compared to 7 in hit condition and 6 in controlled
where did the students in Casey study come from and how many
562 from stanford university nursing school
how many participants completed in self report in casey study in their 20s 30s 40s
20s=155 completed self reports
30s=135 completed self reports
40s=59 completed self reports- experiment 2=27
how many and what age where the participants in grant study
39 participants
17-56 age
how many boys and girls in grant study
17 females 23 males
what did grant study
context dependant memory how good student could recall memory for a test and if it could be improved
Moray experiment 1 sample
Sample: no sample
Moray experiment 1 procedure
Moray used dichotic listening task in lm ear a shadow would read a passage of fiction and in the left ear a word list repeated 3 times and were asked to ignore it.
Moray experiment 1 Procedure 2
Recognition test 21 words they had to identify what they recognised. 7 words were fictional. 7 were rejected message. 7 words weren’t in either message.
Moray experiment 1 conclusion
Selective attention does happen
Unattended information isn’t processed and therefore isn’t recognised.
It shows that there is a back up against some information
Moray experiment 2 sample
Sample: 12ps
Moray exp 3 sample
Sample: 28 ps
Simon and Chabris sample
228 consenting volunteered undergraduates paid large candy only 192ps data was used
Simon and chabris procedure
Sp watched one 75 second video of basketball they had to count the passes for wither white or black team depending on condition. Randomly in the video a umbrella woman or gorilla would walk left to right of the screen
Simon and chabris questions to ps after watching the video
Did you notice anything unusual
Did you notice anything other than the 6 players
Did you see a gorilla or woman carrying a umbrella walking across the screen
Simon and chabris IV and DV
IV easy v hard, white team v black team, transparent v opaque and gorilla v umbrella
DV number of participants who noticed the unexpected event
Kohlberg aim
To investigate moral development and devise stages of moral development
Kohlberg sample
75 American boys
Kohlberg conducted a
Longitudinal study as it investigated children ever 3 years from 10-16 to 24-28
Simon and chabris aim
To build on previous research into divided visual attention and to further investigate inattentional blindness. To see if a prolonged visual event can be missed.
Simon and chabris procedure for easy and hard condition
Ps watched 75 sec basketball game they had to watch either black or white team the team had to count all the number of passes between the teams (easy) or separately count bounces and aerial passes the team made (hard)
What is the unexpected event in Simon and chabris
A tall woman with and umbrella would walk past the screen left to right for 5 seconds or a woman dressed as a gorilla
Simon and chabris conlusion
We are likely to miss information when we are attending something else ( inattentional blindness) and the more concentrated on a task the more likely we are to miss other information
Levine sample
Large cities in 28 countries in large cities and was the members of the population
Levine helping stages
3 different helping stages
Where the victim dropped a cane
Whether the victim was drunk
Wherther the victim hurt leg or dropped a magazine
They were all men
Levine research design/method
Independent measures and field experiment
Levine conclusion
Helping behaviour does differ between countries
The lower wealth of the country the more likely for citizens to offer help
