pyschology Flashcards

1
Q

how many participants are in milgram

A

40 male

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

age of the participants in milgram

A

ages 20-50

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

where was milgram study conducted

A

new haven America

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what occupation did the participants in milgram study do

A

various occupations eg salesman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how many participants where in sperry study

A

11 spilt brain participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what surgery did sperrys participate undergo

A

hemisphere disconnection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

who did freud observe

A

little Hans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the age if little Hans during the study

A

ages 3-5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how participants did bandora at el have

A

72
36 boys 36 girls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

where was the participants from bandoras study from

A

stanford university in California

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

age of the participants in bandoras study

A

ages 3-5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

participants in bocchiaros pilot study

A

92 vu university students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

participants in bocchiaros main study

A

149 under graduates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the participants in the main study of bocchiaros studies given for completing the study

A

£7 or course credit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how many participants in bocchiaros predicting task

A

138

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how many participants in chaneys study

A

32 participants
22males 10 females

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

ages of participants in chaneys study

A

ages 1 1/2 to 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

who gave consent in chaneys

A

the children parents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

how did the self reports get conducted in chaneys study

A

questionnaire and phone interviews

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

loftus and palmer findings

A

smashed condition estimated speed of 40.8mph compared to contacted which was 31.8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

loftus and palmer 2 study findings

A

16 smashed participants said they saw broken glass compared to 7 in hit condition and 6 in controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

where did the students in Casey study come from and how many

A

562 from stanford university nursing school

23
Q

how many participants completed in self report in casey study in their 20s 30s 40s

A

20s=155 completed self reports
30s=135 completed self reports
40s=59 completed self reports- experiment 2=27

24
Q

how many and what age where the participants in grant study

A

39 participants
17-56 age

25
Q

how many boys and girls in grant study

A

17 females 23 males

26
Q

what did grant study

A

context dependant memory how good student could recall memory for a test and if it could be improved

27
Q

Moray experiment 1 sample

A

Sample: no sample

28
Q

Moray experiment 1 procedure

A

Moray used dichotic listening task in lm ear a shadow would read a passage of fiction and in the left ear a word list repeated 3 times and were asked to ignore it.

29
Q

Moray experiment 1 Procedure 2

A

Recognition test 21 words they had to identify what they recognised. 7 words were fictional. 7 were rejected message. 7 words weren’t in either message.

30
Q

Moray experiment 1 conclusion

A

Selective attention does happen
Unattended information isn’t processed and therefore isn’t recognised.
It shows that there is a back up against some information

31
Q

Moray experiment 2 sample

A

Sample: 12ps

32
Q

Moray experiment 2 procedure

A

Aimed to investigate whether meaningful information like a persons name could divert attention in exp 2 the shadow had 10 short passages of light fiction to aim to see what breakers the block of rejected information.

33
Q

Moray exp 2 procedure 2

A

Before the task ps were asked to listen to there right ear they’ll be given instructions to change ears

34
Q

Moray exp 2 procedure 3

A

In 3 of the rejected passages the ps name was used eg .John smith change to your other ear. Ps attentions was measured in ps hearing the instruction then changing the to the ear they were told to

35
Q

Moray experiment 2 conclusions

A

Showed that something meaningful like a name is enough to break through the block that selective attention creates. However were the ps better at hearing the instructions as they were expecting them

36
Q

Moray exp 3 sample

A

Sample: 28 ps

37
Q

Moray exp 3 procedure

A

Moray wanted to see if it was meaningful information that breaks the block or that the ps were given warnings to listen out for something

38
Q

Morays experiment 3 procedure 2

A

2 conditions 14p were not given specific instructions but told they will be asked about content of rejected message 2 condition told to remember the debits they heard

39
Q

Simon and Chabris sample

A

228 consenting volunteered undergraduates paid large candy only 192ps data was used

40
Q

Simon and chabris procedure

A

Sp watched one 75 second video of basketball they had to count the passes for wither white or black team depending on condition. Randomly in the video a umbrella woman or gorilla would walk left to right of the screen

41
Q

Moray questions

A

Did you notice anything unusual
Did you notice anything other than the 6 players
Did you see a gorilla or woman carrying a umbrella walking across the screen

42
Q

Simon and chabris IV and DV

A

IV easy v hard, white team v black team, transparent v opaque and gorilla v umbrella
DV number of participants who noticed the unexpected event

43
Q

Kohlberg aim

A

To investigate moral development and devise stages of moral development

44
Q

Kohlberg sample

A

75 American boys

45
Q

Kohlberg conducted a

A

Longitudinal study as it investigated children ever 3 years from 10-16 to 24-28

46
Q

Simon and chabris aim

A

To build on previous research into divided visual attention and to further investigate inattentional blindness. To see if a prolonged visual event can be missed.

47
Q

Simon and chabris sample

A

Initially 228 but only 192s data was used of the volunteer undergrad students.

48
Q

Simon and chabris procedure

A

Ps watched 75 sec basketball game they had to watch either black or white team the team had to count all the number of passes between the teams (easy) or separately count bounces and aerial passes the team made (hard)

49
Q

What is the unexpected event in Simon and chabris

A

A tall woman with and umbrella would walk past the screen left to right for 5 seconds or a woman dressed as a gorilla

50
Q

Simon and chabris conlusion

A

We are likely to miss information when we are attending something else ( inattentional blindness) and the more concentrated on a task the more likely we are to miss other information

51
Q

Levine sample

A

Large cities in 28 countries in large cities and was the members of the population

52
Q

Levine

A

3 different helping stages
Where the victim dropped a cane
Whether the victim was drunk
Wherther the victim hurt leg or dropped a magazine
They were all men

53
Q

Levine research and design and method

A

Independent measures and field experiment

54
Q

Levine conclusion

A

Helping behaviour does differ between countries

The lower wealth of the country the more likely for citizens to offer help