PVB bits Flashcards
approaches to child decisions
child paternalistic approach
child liberationist approach
what are the types of best interests for children
basic interests - physical/emotional wellbeing
developmental interests - promote child development/emotional maturity/education/confidence/socialisation
autonomy interests - respecting and promoting autonomy
when do basic and developmental interests take precedence in children
if the autonomous decision will result in death or serious harm
should 18 be a cut off for legal protection from bad decisions?
- development continues after 18
- values and beliefs change as an adult
+ if we value autonomy, yes
+ practically there must be a legal cut off
+ there if more than just law to protect from bad decisions
+ autonomy should be respected especially as children start to be able to be exposed to risk factors for ill health at their own choice - drinking alcohol, smoking, extreme sports without adult supervision
how should decisions be made for children without autonomy (babies, infants etc)
best interests - basic and developmental
approaches to parental autonomy
parental rights
best interests
pros and cons of parental rights argument
+ parents share values/beliefs with children
- dont have a right to impose beliefs on others
- parents have duty to ensure child reaches autonomous adulthood
parental autonomy best interests argument
+ parents know child more than anyone else, family welfare is relevant to child
- parents may be too emotionally involved, lack of objective weighing up
- personal values/beliefs may mean they consider effective treatment as unacceptable
risks and benefits of tissue donation as a child
risks - physical harm to child donor, transplant fails for recipient and causes grief and guilt
benefits - altruisim, saving a life, if sibling dies without transplant, guilt and grief
professional guidance for children participation in research
minimal risk of harm
not possible to do in adults
condition specific to children
parental consent
age of consent for children
16+
court approval for major decisions with parental disagreement over 16
what are the requirements for Gillick competency
ask child if you can tell parents - if they say no, respect it
assess child maturity - understanding etc
likely to suffer harm without treatment given
what is utalitarianism
consequence based approach - whatever decision brings greatest happiness is right (benefit is measured by overall happiness from consequences)
pros and cons of utalitarianism decisions
+ democratixc, each persons happiness has value
+ intuitively 10 lives better than 1
- certain actions always wrong
- not all consequences can be forgiven
- may justify heinous acts for greater good
rights based approach to decisions
moral obligation placed on people to uphold rights of others
negative rights - may not harm us, may not steal from us may not kill us etc
positive rights - autonomy, education, healthcare (things that must be provided)
pros and cons of rights based approach decisions
+ protects all individuals, incl marginalised and lacking power
- no power shifting possible
what is the concept of justice
reciprocal relationship between individuals + society - all humans valued equally
if human life valued equally - justice means ensuring equal capability to flourish - access to healthcare
requires that societal structures value people equally
is justice equity?
no, instead removing barriers and engaging with priorities instead of helping those with barriers overcome them