public policy 8 Flashcards
advocacy coalition framework
policy dynamics of conflict and struggle between advocacy coalitions within a specific policy subsystem
policy belief system: deep core
fundamental values that are often implicit and apply to many policy areas
policy belief system: policy core
values specific to a policy area
policy belief system: secondary aspects
choice of instruments to achieve specific values and goals
policy stability
the balance of power (resources, authority & information) between advocacy coalitions are stable
policy changes: deep core
changes are unlikely, but can happen because of external pressures or fundamental changes in the system
policy changes: policy core
changes in balance of power between advocacy coalition
policy changes: secondary aspects
policy learning, feedback
policy monopoly
incremental policy development within a stable policy subsystem
policy punctuations
dramatic non-incremental turning points of policy rationality (destruction / construction of policy monopoly)
policy stability
policy topics without major public and political attention
incremental
gradual and marginal policy change
non-incremental
disrupt stakeholders network & rapid and fundamental
policy innovation
new policy in new area when new situations have emerged
policy succession
replacement of a policy without changing the fundamental ideas
policy maintenance
incrementalism, secondary adjustments to established policy
policy termination
deconstruction of a policy, because it was successful, or because it doesn’t fit anymore / didn’t work / new regulations
first order learning
learning focused on improving policy instruments (policy maintenance)
second order learning
choice and selection of policy instruments (policy succession)
third order learning
aims and priorities of policies (policy innovation or termination)
powering
interest driven nature of policy making
puzzling
finding & solving public problems
reflective learning
open process where fundamental policy ideas are discussed
epistemic learning
address fundamental ideas & learning promoted by certified actors
learning through bargaining
high tractability and multiple actors are involved
learning in the shadow of hierarchy
high tractability and high certification of actors
comprehensive rationalist model
ignoring the complexity of problems
single loop learning
most simple feedback, no search for causes
double loop learning
more analytical of causes of problems
epistemic communities
networks of experts in a particular domain, held together by a shared set of beliefs
frame alignment
connecting frames to have a broader shared interpretation of situation and trigger collective action
learning as critical frame reflection
role of researcher not to resolve policy controversies, but to help involved actors with reframing
4 causes of path dependency
past policies define the today playing field, policies follow a historic sequence of events, group think & self-referentiality