Psychopathology - Behavioural explanations of Phobias Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

how does the behavioural approach explain phobias

A

the behavioural approach is focused on explaining the behaviours created by the phobia and does not explain the cognitive or emotional features of phobias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who applied the two-process model to phobias

A

Mowrer 1960

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was Mowrer 1960’s two-process model

A

he theorised that phobias are learnt (acquired) by classical conditioning and then continued because of operant conditioning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the aquisition of the phobia by classical conditioning

A
  • Involves learning to associate something of which we initially have no fear (neutral stimulus) with something that already triggers a fear response (unconditional response).
    1. Phobic objects start as a neutral stimulus (NS)
    2. if it is then paired with an unconditioned stimulus (UCS), which produces an unconditioned response (UCR) the NS will become associated with the UCS.
    3. Then the UCS and then the fear (phobia), will occur whenever the NS is there
    4. The NS becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS) and the UCR becomes the conditioned response (CR)
    This conditioning is then generalised to similar objects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

describe the maintenance by operant conditioning

A
  • Behaviour is reinforced (rewarded) or punished
  • Negative reinforcement = individual avoids a situation or stimulus. This results in a desirable consequence = repeated behaviour
  • Reduction of fear reinforces the avoidance behaviour = phobia being maintained
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe Little Albert 1920

A

Aim was to give Albert a phobia by using classical conditioning. / to investigate whether phobias can be learned.
Albert showed no anxiety at the beginning of the study when he was introduced to a variety of animals.
When shown a white rat he tried to play with it. However, whenever the rat was presented to him after, the experimenters made a loud frightening noise by banging an iron bar close to Alberts head.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

break down the conditioning present for little Albert 1920

A

The noise is the UCS which creates an UCR of fear.
When the rat the NS and the UCS are encountered close together in time the NS becomes associated with the UCS, and both now produce the fear response – albert became frightened when he saw the rat.
The rat is now the CR.
This conditioning is generalised to similar objects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened after the initial experiment on little Albert 1920

A

They tested Albert by showing him other furry objects such as a non-white rabbit, a fur coat and Watson wearing a Santa Claus beard and mask. Little Albert displayed distress at the sight of all of these.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who carried out the little Albert experiment in 1920

A

John Watson and Rosalie Rayner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is an ethical weaknesses of the Little Albert experiment

A

Ethical - It was an unethical experiment at he wasnt from psychological harm (doesn’t need a this means that for this precise thing) additionally they didnt recondition him to not be frightened.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a methodological weakness of the little Albert experiment

A

methodological - lab created fear so may not reflect phobias in real life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the strengths of the behavioural explanation of phobias

A
  • A strength is that the two-process model has real-world application, it explains using two distinctive elements how phobias are both created and maintained. It is supported by Watson and Rayner’s ‘Little Albert’ study which shows how a frightening experience can be conditioned.
  • Implications for therapy – explains why patients need to be exposed to the feared stimulus.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the limitations of the behavioural explanation of phobias

A
  • The two-process model doesnt account for the cognitive processes associated with phobias, behavioural explanations focus on the cause.
  • Doesn’t explain avoidance is to reduce the anxiety
  • Not all phobias appear following a bad experience
  • Evolutionary factors (Bouton 2007)
  • Biological Preparedness (Seligman 1971)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

state and describe 2 alternative explanations of phobias

A
  • Evolutionary factors -Bouton 2007 we easily acquire phobias of things which may have been a source of danger in our past
    eg. snakes, dark
  • Biological Preparedness - Seligman 1971 innate predisposition to acquire certain fears more to phobias than just conditioning.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How is phobias not always appearing from experience a limitation of the behavioural explanation of phobias

A

Not all phobias appear following a bad experience and the phobia of snakes is evidenced in many people who have no experience of them, which does not support the two-process model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly