Psychopathology Flashcards
Statistical deviation
Occurs when an individual has a less common characteristic, for example being more depressed or less intelligent than most of the population
Deviation from social norms
Concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in the community or society
Statistical deviation example IQ and intellectual disability disorder
This statistical approach comes into its own when we are dealing with characteristics that can be reliably measured, for example intelligence. We know that, in any human characteristic, the majority of people scores will cluster around the average, and that the further we go above or below the average, the fewer people will attain that score.
This is called the normal distribution.
The average IQ is set at 100. Most people (68%) have an IQ in the range from 85 to 115. Only 2% of people have a score below 70. Those individuals scoring below 70 are very unusual or abnormal and are liable to receive a diagnosis of a psychological disorder – intellectual disability disorder
Deviation from social norms – norms are specific to the culture we live in
Of course those social norms may be different for each generation and every culture, so there are relatively few behaviours that would be considered universally abnormal on the basis that they breach social norms. For example, homosexuality continues to be viewed as abnormal in some cultures and was considered abnormal in our society in the past
Deviation from social norms example – antisocial personality disorder
A person with antisocial personality disorder (psychopathy) is impulsive, aggressive and irresponsible. According to the DSM–5 (the manual used by psychiatrists to diagnose mental disorder) one important symptom of antisocial personality disorder is an absence of prosocial internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful or culturally normative ethical behaviour.
In other words we are making the social judgement that a psychopath is abnormal because they don’t conform to our moral standards. Psychopathic behaviour would be considered abnormal in a very wide range of cultures
Statistical deviation evaluation points
Real life application
Unusual characteristics can be positive
Not everyone unusual benefits from a label
Real life application evaluation of statistical deviation
A strength of statistical deviation is that it has a real life application in the diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder. There is therefore a place for statistical deviation in thinking about what are normal and abnormal behaviours and characteristics.
Actually all assessment of patients with mental disorders include some kind of measurement of how severe the symptoms are as compared to statistical norms. Statistical deviation is thus a useful part of clinical assessment
Unusual characteristics can be positive evaluation of statistical deviation
IQ scores over 130 are just as unusual as those below 70, but we wouldn’t think of super intelligence as an undesirable characteristic that needs treatment. Just because very few people display certain behaviours does make the behaviour statistically abnormal but doesn’t mean it requires treatment to return to normal
This is a serious limitation to the concept of statistical deviation and means that it would never be used alone to make a diagnosis
Not everyone unusual benefits from the label evaluation of statistical deviation
Another problem with statistical deviation is that, where someone is living a happy fulfilled life, there is no benefit to them being labelled as abnormal regardless of how unusual they are. So someone with a very low IQ but who was not distressed, quite capable of working, etc, would simply not need a diagnosis of intellectual disability.
If that person was labelled as abnormal this might have a negative effect on the way others view them and the way they view themselves
Not a sole explanation evaluation of deviation from social norms
A strength of the deviation from social norms definition is that it has a real life application in the diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder.
There is therefore a place for deviation from social norms in thinking about what is normal and abnormal. However, even in this case there are other factors to consider, for example the distress to other people resulting from antisocial personality disorder. So in practice, deviation from social norms is never the sole reason for defining abnormality
Cultural relativism evaluation of deviation from social norms
Another problem with using deviation from social norms to define behaviour as abnormal is that social norms vary tremendously from one generation to another and from one community to another. This means, for example, that a person from one cultural group may label someone from another culture as behaving abnormally according to their standards rather than the standards of the person behaving that way.
For example, hearing voices is socially acceptable in some cultures but would be seen as a sign of mental abnormality in the UK. This creates problems for people from one culture living within another culture group
Can lead to human rights abuses evaluation of deviation from social norms
Too much reliance on deviation from social norms to understand abnormality can also lead to systematic abuse of human rights. Looking at the historical examples of deviation from social norms it it is pretty clear that these diagnoses were really there to maintain control over minority ethnic groups and women. (Black slaves – running away and women – sexual attraction to working-class men) The classifications appear ridiculous nowadays – but only because our social norms have changed. More radical psychologists suggest that some of our modern categories of mental disorder are really abuses of peoples rights to be different
Failure to function adequately
Occurs when someone is unable to cope with ordinary demands of day-to-day living
Deviation from ideal mental health
Occurs when someone does not meet a set of criteria for good mental health
When is someone failing to function adequately? Rosenhan and Seligman
They have proposed some signs that can be used to determine when someone is not coping.
-when a person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules, for example maintaining eye contact and respecting personal space
– when a person experiences severe personal distress
– when a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others
Failure to function adequately example – intellectual disability disorder
One criteria for the diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder is having a very low IQ. However, a diagnosis would not be made on this basis only – an individual must also be failing to function adequately before diagnosis would be given
What does ideal mental health look like? Jahoda
She suggested that we are in good mental health if we meet the following criteria:
– we have no symptoms or distress
– we are rational and can perceive ourselves accurately
– we self-actualise (reach our potential)
-we can cope with stress
– we have a realistic view of the world
– we have good self-esteem and lack guilt
– we are independent of other people
– we can successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure
Failure to function adequately evaluation points
Patient’s perspective
Is it simply a deviation from social norms?
Subjective judgements