Psychopathology Flashcards
what are the 4 definitions of abnormality?
- statistical infrequency
- deviation from social norms
- failure to function adequately
- deviation from ideal mental health
what is deviation from social norms?
behaviours that are atypical to the accepted standards of behaviour in society
what is a strength of the deviation from social norms definition of abnormality?
it is a more appropriate definition compared to ‘statistical infrequency’
this is because whilst deviation from social norms distinguishes between desirable and undesirable behaviour and the effect it has on others, the statistical infrequency definition classes behaviour as normal if it falls out of the ‘range’ for most people. this is a strength as it may be a more appropriate definition of abnormal behaviour
what are the weaknesses of the deviation from social norms definition of abnormality
- social norms vary as times change. this is because what is socially acceptable now may not have been socially acceptable 50 years ago. for example, today homosexuality is acceptable but in the past it was deemed a psychological concern by the DSM. this is a weakness as the lack of consistency reduces the validity of this definition
- also, norms differ between cultures (culturally relative). for example, hearing voices is deemed socially deviant in western cultures, but in others it is accepted. this s a problem as the definition should be consistent between cultures, and since it isnt it can be described as ethnocentric
- lastly, it can be criticised for terming people as deviant when they are just trying to express their individuality. for example, just because people dont conform to what is deemed ‘normal’ by society, doesnt mean that they are psychologically abnormal. this is a weakness as this definition can be damaging to certain people in society.
what is failure to function adequatley?
behaviour that entails somebody being unable to cope with everyday life or engage in everyday behaviours
what is the accronym to remember the 5 features of failure to function adequately proposed by researchers? also define the features
MUSIC
- maladaptive = when someone is stopping themselves from progressing
- unconventional = abnormal behaviour
- suffering = struggling to cope
- irrational = acting in a way that people do not understand
- control (lost) = acting in an unpredictable and inappropriate manner
what is a strength of the failure to function adequately definition of abnormaltity?
- it includes the patients perspective. this is because it allows us to view the mental disorder from the point of view of the person experiencing it. for example, the level of distress experienced by a patient is considered when determining whether their behaviour is abnormal or not. this is a strength as the definition provides useful criterion, which allows patients to self assess themselves and their own level of functioning
what are the weaknesses of the failure to function adequately definition of abnormality?
- abnormality is not always accompanied with disfunction, as people with dangerous personality disorders can still appear normal. for example, harold shipman, a GP that murdered 215 of his patients over a 23 year period seemed to be a respectable doctor. therefore, this is a weakness as using this definition may not be appropriate in all cases.
- also, this definition is limited by cultural relativism. for example, long periods of grief after bereavement are more acceptable in some cultures than others. this means whilst behaviour may be be seen as failure to function in one place, it may be completely normal in another. this is a weakness as the definition is not consistent within cultures.
what is statistical infrequency?
when behaviour is classed as abnormal because it falls out of the typical range on a normal distribution curve and is infrequent in the population (two+ standard deviations from the mean)
what is a strength of the statistical infrequency definition of abnormality?
- its an objective way to define abnormality, as a clear cut off point has been agreed. this makes it easier to decide who meets the criteria to be labelled as abnormal in comparison to other definitions. therefore this definition is seen as less subjective as the other definitions
what are the weaknesses of the statistical infrequency definition of abnormality?
- the are many abnormal behaviours that are actually desirable. for example, very few people have an IQ above 150, yet it would not be suggested that having an IQ above 150 makes somebody abnormal. this is a weakness as only undesirable behaviours need to be identified, so the definition cannot be used alone when making a diagnosis
- statistical infrequency may also be culturally biased, as there are behaviours that are statistically infrequent in some cultures, but more frequent in others. this is a problem as the definition would class these people as abnormal, despite their behaviour being deemed normal where they are from.
what is deviation from ideal mental health as defined by jahoda? what is the accronym for this?
people who lack all the following characteristics for optimal living:
- an accurate perception of reality
- a resistance to stress (being able to cope in stressful situations)
- self attitudes that are positive (such as high self esteem and a strong sense of identity)
- autonomy (functioning independently)
- self actualisation (being focused on the future and fulfilling their potential)
- mastery of environment (ability to adjust to new situations)
what is a strength of the deviation from ideal mental health definition of abnormality?
it offers an alternative perspective on mental disorders. this is because the definition focuses on the positives rather than the negatives. therefore, jahodas ideas are in accordance with the humanistic approach, which also focus on the positive nature of humanity
what are the weaknesses of the deviation from ideal mental health definition of abnormality?
- definition is ethnocentric. this is because the ideals of mental health are not applicable to all cultures. for example, the criterion of self-actualisation is relevant to members of individualistic cultures but not collectivist cultures, where individuals strive for the greater good of the community, rather than just themselves. this is a problem as for the definition to be classed as reliable, the same behaviour should be viewed consistently between cultures.
- also, it is unclear how many of the criterion need to be absent before someone can be classed as deviating from ideal mental health. for example, it is unknown whether all 6 need to be lacking in the individual, or whether they could lack only one or two before being classed. this makes way for subjectivity during diagnosis, which may differ between individual psychiatrists, leading to inconsistency. this is a weakness because the lack of objectivity means that this definition is rarely used in the real world
what is a phobia?
an irrational fear of an object or situation, that is out of proportion to the phobic stimulus
what is a common source used to diagnose mental health problems?
the DSM-5