Psychopathology Flashcards
Definition of Abnormality
A psychological/ behavioural state leading to impairment of interpersonal functioning and/or distress to others.
Definitions of Abnormality: Statistical infrequency
Statistical norms: any commonly seen behaviour or characteristic amongst the population.
Statistical infrequency: rare occurrences among the population.
-Someone is abnormal if their trait, thinking or behaviour is statistically rare & infrequent.
-This is an objective, mathematical method.
Normal distribution
A symmetrical spread of data frequency that forms a bell-shaped pattern.
The mean, median & mode are all located at the highest peak.
IQ & intellectual disability disorder
-Average IQ is set at 100.
-Most people (68%) have a score ranging from 85-115.
-Only 2% have a score below 70.
-These individuals are ‘abnormal’ and can receive a diagnosis of a psychological disorder - intellectual disability disorder (IDD).
-95% fall within 2 standard deviations of the mean.
Strength of SI: Useful in clinical practice
-Used in clinical as part of formal diagnosis & to assess severity of symptoms.
-E.g. IDD requires an IQ of below 70z
-Beck depression tool is used to assess severe depression with a score of 30+ (top 5%) of respondents.
Shows value of SI criterion is useful in diagnosis.
Limitation of SI: Unusual characteristics can be positive
Statistical infrequent characteristics can be positive too.
-People with an IQ above 130 is also unusual, but not considered abnormal.
-Being unusual at one end of the psychological spectrum does not necessarily someone abnormal.
Not sufficient as a sole basis to define abnormality.
Strength of SI: Benefits of ‘abnormality’
-Someone who has a low IQ and is diagnosed with IDD can access support services or someone with high BDI may access therapy.
-Counter: Not all statistically unusual people benefit from labels. Someone with a low IQ who can cope with their lifestyle may not need a label. Leads to social stigma & self-fulfilling prophecy.
Definitions of Abnormality: Deviation from social norms
Social norms: unwritten rules for acceptable behaviour, but also can be policed by laws.
Deviation from social norms: defines abnormality by behaviour thats different from the accepted standards in society (against the norm).
Norms are culturally specific
-Few behaviours that would be considered universally abnormal on the basis that they breach social norms.
-E.g. homosexuality was considered abnormal in our culture and is still viewed that way in some cultures & is even illegal.
-> April 2019, Brunei introduced law that make sex between men and women offence punishable by stoning to death.
Example: antisocial personality disorder
-A person with this is impulsive, aggressive & irresponsible.
-According to DSM-5 (manual by psychiatrists to diagnose mental disorder), an important symptom of antisocial personality, is absence of pro social internal standard (failure to conform to lawful/acceptable behaviour).
-Social judgement that psychopaths abnormal for not conforming to our moral standards.
Strength of Deviation from social norms: Useful in clinical practice
-Key defining characteristic of antisocial personality, is failure to conform to acceptable behaviour (ie. recklessness,aggression).
-These are deviating from norms.
-Also plays part in diagnosis of schizotypal personality disorder where the term ‘strange’ is used to characterise the thinking, behaviour & appearance of people with the disorder.
Shows value in psychiatry.
Limitation of Deviation from social norms: Cultural & situational relativism
Limited due to variability between norms in diff cultures and situations.
-A person from 1 cultural group may label someone from another group abnormal to their standards.
-E.g. hearing voices is the norm in some cultures as messages from ancestors/religious messages, but would be a sign of abnormality in UK.
-E.g. Finishing food on a plate is respectful in British culture, but in India, it’s a sign of hunger.
-Aggressive and deceitful behaviour is not acceptable in family, but more so in context of corporate deal-making.
Difficult to judge deviations across cultures and situations.
Limitation of Deviation from social norms: Norms change
A behaviour that broke social norms in 1950, may be normal today.
-E.g. an unmarried mother in 40s, would break norms and classified abnormal, and these women were sectioned as ‘moral imbeciles’ and society demanded they give up their babies.
-The individuals don’t change, but the classification of behaviour does.
Lacks reliability as it doesn’t consistently produce an accurate definition of aboral behaviour over time.
Definitions of abnormality: Failure to function adequately
Maladaptiveness: failure to fucntion adequately.
-States abnormal behaviour is when an individual can’t cope with everyday life.
-Acknowledges people may act differently if they can’t manage everyday life.
Rosenhan & Seligman (1989) - 7 features
Focusses on; no conforming to standard interpersonal rules, severe personal distress and irrational behaviour.
7 features:
1. Personal distress
2. Maladaptive behavuour
3. Unpredictability
4. Irrationality
5. Observer discomfort
6. Violation of moral standards
7. Unconventionality