psychopathology Flashcards
phobias
anxiety disorders characterised by extreme irrational fears
clinical characteristics of phobias
behavioural characteristics: avoidant/anxiety response
emotional characteristics: persistent excessive fear
cognitive characteristics: recognition of exaggerated anxiety
behavioural approach of phobias: 2 step acquisition of a phobia
classical conditioning - creates phobia
operant conditioning - maintains phobia
study to support behavioural explanation of phobias
watson and rayner: little albert
- exposed to white rat (neutral stimuli), produced no response
- when paired with a loud bang (unconditioned stimuli), produces unconditioned response of fear
- through several repeats, little albert made the association between the rat (conditioned stimulus) and fear (conditioned response)
- now when presented with a rat, albert avoids it (maintaining phobia through operant conditioning)
evaluation of behavioural approach study
- only one ptp so findings cannot be generalised to others (low external validity)
- albert’s final test was at 12 months, but fears emerge naturally over time in infants, so maturation could account for albert’s reactions
- albert’s reactions were inconsistent: showed little distress to rat in later tests, suggesting conditioning wasn’t very effective or durable
- no informed consent from albert’s parents
- deliberate psychological harm on little albert: unethical
- watson and rayner didn’t attempt to decondtion or desensitise albert to the fear response, so they didn’t remove the psychological trauma they had induced
behavioural treatment of phobias
systematic desensitisation: based on classical conditioning, taught relaxation which leads to reciprocal inhibition
flooding: fear is taken to the worst case, either imagined or real until client can no longer feel fear due to exhaustion
evaluation of treatment of phobias
systematic desensitisation:
- mainly suitable for patients that are able to learn and use relaxation strategies
- if used in imaginary sense, no guarantee it will work irl
- only really works on simple phobias, not effective on social phobias
flooding:
- ethical issues surrounding psychological harm
- not suitable for patients in bad health, risk of heart attacks
clinical characteristics of depression
behavioural: loss of energy, social impairment, weight change, poor personal hygiene
emotional: loss of enthusiasm, constant sad mood, feeling of worthlessness
cognitive: unipolar - delusions thoughts of death, poor memory
cognitive explanation/ approach to depression
- becks negative triad: negative views about the world, the future and the self. negative schemas + cognitive bias = maintain negative triad
- cognitive biases: doesn’t explain why it happens.
- ellis’ abc model: activating event, beliefs, consequences. depressives mistakenly blame external events for their unhappiness. however, its their interpretation of these events that is to blame for their distress
cognitive biases
- arbitrary inference: thinking everything is your fault
- selective abstraction: only remembering the negatives
- overgeneralisation: making everything a big deal
- magnification and minimisation: everything bad is a big deal, everything good isn’t a big deal
studies to support cognitive model/explanation of depression + evaluation
saisto et al:
- studied expectant mothers and found that those that didn’t adjust to personal goals to match specific demands to the transition to motherhood, and indulged in negative thinking had increased depression
- sample = biases as its only mothers and children
tony and glazioli:
- assessed 65 pregnant women for vulnerability before and after birth.
- women with high vulnerability had post-natal depression cognitions that developed before pregnancy. shows how negative triad increases likelihood of depression
- doesn’t support ellis’ abc model as it states that an activating event triggers the depression. however, no negative event has occurred to the pregnant women so it’s a chemical imbalance that leads to depressive thoughts
more evaluation of the cognitive approach to treating depression
- acknowledges other aspects of depression including genetics: acknowledges brain’s set capacity, but also that it can be affected by surroundings you’re in (nature/nurture)
- this approach has less success in treating bipolar depression: won’t stop hallucinations. telling people that something isn’t there won’t make it go away
- not all depressives have a distorted view of their own abilities: you are assuming they believe their abilities are less of what they are -> not all people who suffer with depression suffer from this
cognitive behavioural treatment of depression
beck’s cognitive behaviour therapy:
- identification of irrational thoughts/negative triad
- ‘patient as scientist’: generate hypothesis to test validity of irrational thoughts
- reinforcement of positive thoughts
- cognitive restructuring
ellis’ rational emotive behaviour therapy (REBT):
- ABCDE model
- D = disputing
- E = effect
- central idea is to identify irrational thoughts and dispute them through vigorous argument
- change negative belief and break the link between the event and depression
- 3 types of dispute: pragmatic, empirical, logical
research to support CBT
Lincoln et al:
- used questionnaire on stroke victims who developed clinical depression
- 19 patients were given CBT for 4 months
- found that patients reported a reduction in symptoms, supports idea that cbt reduces symptoms of depression
- however, study used self reports, which means ptps could have been affected by social desirability effects and not reported the truth.
- yet, study is a naturally occuring phenomena and therefore is more internally valid in its approach to researching depression
embling:
- used opportunity sample of 38 patients aged 19-65 suffering depression
- group of 19 patients were used as a control group who took antidepressants and had no cbt
- dv = to record dysfunctional thought record to record mood changes on a scale of 1-100 to rate emotions like anger and anxiety
- beck’s depression inventory 2 was used to assess both groups depression levels as the dv aswell
- treatment group expressed more negative emotions by the end of the treatment, which shows success of cbt as they could express themselves
- conclusions: depressed patients are less likely to readily express negative emotions
- evaluation: lack of depressed emotions may be a casual factor rather than an effect of depression. improvement of the treatment group may be the fact they were seen more than the control group and for longer time than control group
evaluation of treatment of cbt
- cognitive approach puts burden of responsibility on the person to change thinking
- what if some of the person’s ‘irrational’ beliefs are true
- cbt is as effective as drug treatment in depression, without the side effects
- only works if client truly gets involved and follows through the whole treatment