Psychology: Social Influence 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Define obedience

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why did Milgram want to study obedience? (what inspired him?)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Briefly outline the procedure of Milgram’s study.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline key information about the participants:
- How many were there?
- How were they recruited?
- How diverse were the participants?
- What reward did they receive for participating?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the results of Milgram’s study? Include both qualitative and quantitative data.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What percentage of participants were glad to have taken part when they received their full
debrief?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Milgram conclude about obedience on the basis of his findings?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How generalisable is Milgram’s study? Why is this a strength/ weakness of his explanation?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How replicable is Milgram’s study? Outline a replication that has been done and explain why
this is a strength of Milgram’s explanation.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What implications has this research got for society? Why is this a strength of Milgram’s
explanation of obedience?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluate the validity of Milgram’s research. Make sure to refer to Psychological researchers in your answer. If possible make it a double PEEL.
Hint: Orne + Holland, Perry, Sheridan + King, Hofling et al.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the three situational factors affecting obedience that Milgram investigated?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the three variations of proximity? How much did obedience change for each of the
three variations?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did Milgram vary the location of the study? How much did obedience change? Why?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How did Milgram vary the uniform in the study? How did obedience change?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What research support is there for Milgram’s situational variables? Why is this a strength of
Milgram’s explanation?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How has Milgram’s research into situational variables been replicated in other cultures? Why is
this an important strength of his explanation?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How can you counter-criticise the research conducted in other cultures for the situational
variables? Why is this a limitation of Milgram’s explanation? (Bond + Smith)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Why might Milgram’s research lack internal validity? How is this a limitation?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What big event(s) sparked Milgram’s interest in studying obedience, and what was the common
factor amongst them all?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Define agentic state

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define autonomous state

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the agentic shift?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What are binding factors? Give an example of one in Milgram’s study.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

How can you explain the results of Milgram’s study using the agentic state explanation?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is legitimate authority and give some examples of people who generally are seen to have
legitimate authority.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What do perceived legitimate authority figures lead us to do?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What are some visible symbols that make authority legitimate?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

How can Milgram’s study be explained using the legitimacy of authority explanation?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What did Blass + Schmidt (2001) find? How does this support Milgram’s explanation of
obedience?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

How can you use Hofling’s study to evaluate LoA and agentic state?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

How can this explanation of obedience explain cultural differences? Why is this a strength of
this explanation?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

How does the legitimacy of authority explanation manage to explain real life events? Why is
this a strength?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Define authoritarian personality (AP).

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What does dispositional explanation mean?

36
Q

What is the procedure of Adorno’s F-scale study?
- Participant number, characteristic etc
- What was he studying?
- What did he use to study this?

37
Q

What did Adorno find in his study? How is this important for obedience?

38
Q

What are some characteristics of people with an authoritarian personality? (attitudes, cognition etc)

39
Q

What reason did Adorno give for people developing an AP?

40
Q

How is Adorno’s theory a Psychodynamic explanation?

41
Q

What is acquiescence bias? How is this a limitation of Adorno’s explanation of obedience?

42
Q

What supporting evidence has this theory of obedience got? Why is this a strength of this
explanation of obedience?

43
Q

How can we counter-criticise this supporting evidence? What might the 3rd variable be?

44
Q

How does this explanation not account for mass obedience? Why is this a limitation?

45
Q

How does this explanation compare to the situational explanation? Is this a strength or limitation?

46
Q

Define minority influence

47
Q

Why does minority influence lead to internalisation?

48
Q

Outline the procedure of Moscovici’s blue-green slide study. What were the three conditions?

49
Q

Outline the findings of Moscovici’s blue-green slide study. What conclusions can be drawn from
this study?

50
Q

What are the three important factors for effective minority influence?

51
Q

How is consistency important for minority influence? What are the two types of consistency?

52
Q

What is the augmentation principle? Which process is that demonstrating of minority influence?

53
Q

Why do the minority also need to be flexible?

54
Q

How might minority influence have limited real-life application? Why is this a problem for minority
influence as an explanation?
S+C: can you countercriticise this point?

55
Q

Why might it be difficult to measure the effect of the minority? Why is this a problem?

56
Q

Research into minority influence uses artificial tasks. Why is this a limitation?

57
Q

What research support is there for the idea that minority viewpoints are more likely to be
internalised? How is this a strength of the explanation?

58
Q

What research support is there for the idea that minority viewpoints are more likely to be influential
when they are consistent? How is this a strength of the explanation?

59
Q

Define resistance to social influence.

60
Q

Define Locus of Control (LoC)

61
Q

What does someone with a high internal LoC believe about themselves? Give an example of how
someone with a high internal LoC might interpret a situation.

62
Q

What type of explanation is LoC? Why? (situational vs dispositional)

63
Q

Who is the key Psychologist for LoC?

64
Q

Which type of LoC is more likely to resist Social Influence? Why?
Hint: there are multiple potential reasons

65
Q

Define social support (SS).

66
Q

How does social support enable someone to resist social influence?

67
Q

What type of explanation is SS? Why? (situational vs dispositional)

68
Q

Give a specific research example of how SS can reduce obedience.

69
Q

Give a specific research example of how SS can reduce conformity.

70
Q

What research support is there for SS as an explanation for resisting SI? Why is this a strength of
the explanation?

71
Q

What research support is there for LoC as an explanation for resisting SI? Why is this a strength of
the explanation?

72
Q

What contradictory evidence is there? How is this a limitation of the explanation for resisting social
influence?

73
Q

How might the role of LoC be exaggerated? Why is this a limitation of the LoC explanation for
resisting SI?

74
Q

Define social influence

75
Q

Define social change

76
Q

What are the processes of minority influence in social change?

77
Q

What is social cryptoamnesia and when does it occur?

78
Q

Use a specific example to demonstrate how minority influence can lead to social change.

79
Q

How can social change occur through conformity processes?

80
Q

How can social change occur through obedience processes?

81
Q

What research did Nolan et al. or Schulz et al., conduct? Why is this a strength of conformity being
involved in social change?

82
Q

How is minority influence most likely to be indirect? Why is this a limitation?

83
Q

How has the idea of deeper processing been counteracted? Why is this important?

84
Q

What might be a barrier to social change? Why is this important?

85
Q

What methodological issues are there in research conducted about social influence processes
involved in social change? How is this a limitation?
Countercriticise: can you turn research methods into a strength?