Psychological therapies for SZ Flashcards
(32 cards)
3 main psychological therapies for SZ
- Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
- Family therapy
- Token economy
CBT
- NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) recommend that all people should be offered CBT (CBTp for psychosis) in the treatment for SZ
- helps to deal with the symptoms of SZ + improve patient’s functioning
- at least 16 sessions
- used to treat residual symptoms of antipsychotic medication
- helps to treat LT +ve and -ve symptoms
- taken alongside antipsychotic medication
- can be group sessions or one to one
- involved ABC model
process of CBTp
- Assessment
- Engagement
- The ABC model
- Normalisation
- Critical collaborative analysis
- Developing alternative explanations
Assessment - CBTp
- patient expresses their thoughts to the therapist
- realistic goals for therapy are discusses
The ABC model - CBTp
- patient gives their explanation of activating event (A)
- that appear to cause their emotional behaviour (B) + consequences (C)
- patient’s own beliefs can then be rationalised, disputed + changed
Normalisation - CBTp
conveying to people that many people have unusual experiences e.g. hallucinations + delusions
= reduces anxiety + isolation
= less alienation + stigmatised
Developing alternative explanations - CBTp
- patients develops their own alternative explanations for their previously unhealthy assumptions
- new ideas constructed w/ therapist through e.g. positive self talk
ads of CBTp
- more effective
- depends on stage of disorder
disads of CBTp
- lack of availability
- meta-analysis
more effective - ads of CBTp
- CBTp seems to be more effective in treating SZ compared to standard care (antipsychotic medication alone)
- a review of treatments for SZ found consistent evidence that CBTp was effective in reducing rehospitalisation rates up to 18 months
- also reducing the severity of symptoms + improvements in social functioning
depends on the stage of the disorder - ads of CBTp
- the effectiveness of CBTp is dependant on the stage of the disorder
- group based CBTp seem to be more effective following the stabilisation of the psychotic symptoms w/ medication
= helps normalise their experience by meeting similar individuals - not effective in the initial acute phase of SZ where self reflection is not appropriate
lack fo availability - disads of CBTp
- despite being recommended by NICE as treatment for SZ
- estimated only 1 in 10 individuals w/ SZ actually have access to CBTp
- study found that in North West of England, out of 187 SZ patients, only 13 (7%) had been offered CBTp
- HOWEVER, a significant number either refuse or fail to attend the therapy sessions
= limiting effectiveness
meta-analysis - disads of CBTp
- there are problems w/ meta-analysis of CBTp as treatment for SZ
- there is a failure to take into account the quality of the studies
- e.g. in some studies, they fail to randomly allocate participants to CBTp or control conditions
- other studies fail to assess the patients subsequent assessment of symptoms + general functioning
= the methodologically weak trials translated into biased findings about the effectiveness of CBTp
Family therapy
- aim of family therpay is to provide support for carers
= attempt to make family life less stressful
= reduce rehospitalisation - at least 10 sessions
- NICE stress that this should be considered a priority where there are persistent symptoms of high risk of relapse
- offered for a period of 3-12 months
- aimed at reducing the level of EE (Expressed Emotion), reduce risk of relapse
process of family therapy
- reducing level of EE + stress = reduce risk of relapse
- psychoeducation
- forming an alliance w/ relatives
- reducing emotional climate
- enhancing relatives’ ability tp anticipate + solve problems
- reducing expressions of anger + guilt by family members
- maintaining reasonable expectations among family members for patient performance
- encouraging relatives to set appropriate limits/ boundaries
procedure - key study on family therapy
- Pharaoh et al reviewed 53 studies to investigate the effectiveness of family intervention
- studies chosen were conducted in Europe, Asia + North America
- studies compared the outcomes from family therapy to ‘standard’ care (antipsychotic medication alone)
- researchers concentrated on studies that are randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
findings - key study on family therapy
- mental state = overall impression was mixed, some studies reported improvement + some didn’t
- compliance w/ medication = use of family therapy meant that patients took medication more
- social functioning = some improvement on general functioning, nit much effect on outcomes such as living independently or employment
- reduction in relapse + readmission = there was a reduction in the risk of relapse
= there was a reduction in hospital admission during treatment + in 24 months after
ads of family therapy
- economic benefits
- positive impact
disads of family therapy
- medication compliance, effective?
- lack of blinding in method
economic benefits - ads of family therapy
- there are economical benefits to family therapy
- NICE review of family studies demonstrated that family therapy is associated w/ significant cost savings when offered to people w/ SZ
- the extra cost of family therapy is offset by a reduction in costs of hospitalisation = lower relapse rates
- also evidence that family therapy reduces relapse rates for significant period after intervention
= costs savings would be even higher
positive impact - ads of family therapy
- the impact of family therapy on family members is also advantageous
- a study analysed the results of 50 family therapy studied
= 60% if these studies reported a significant positive impact of the intervention
(-ve) ALTHOUGH the methodological quality of most of these studies was poor
= making it difficult to distinguish the effective from ineffective intervention
positive impact - ads of family therapy
- the impact of family therapy on family members is also advantageous
- a study analysed the results of 50 family therapy studied
= 60% if these studies reported a significant positive impact of the intervention
(-ve) ALTHOUGH the methodological quality of most of these studies was poor
= making it difficult to distinguish the effective from ineffective intervention
medication compliance, effective? - disads of family therapy
is family therapy effective?
- according to Pharaoh’s study, it increased patient compliance w/ medication –> improvements in their mental state + social functioning
- but does it mean that family therapy improved patients symptoms or medication?
- overall the evidence for family therapy is mixed
lack of blinding in method - disads of family therapy
- there is an overall problem w/ a lack of blinding in family therapy studies
- in Pharoah’s study, 10/52 studies reported in the meta-analysis didn’t use any form of blinding
= raters knew whether parts were attached to the experimental or control conditions
= creates rater bias, may rate the parts allocated to family therapy conditions as showing an improvement
= creates problems as it doesn’t really tell us whether family therapy is really effective