PSYC 3330 - 4 (attention) Flashcards

1
Q

Atkinson and Shiffrin’s modal model assumes

A

multiple memory systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What regions are in charge of perception and long-term storage?

A

non-frontal regions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What regions are in charge of short-term maintence and manipulation?

A

frontal regions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Single cell recodings:

A

-electrodes placed in/near neuron

-measure action potentials per second

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Event-related potentials (ERP)

A

-electrodes placed on skull

-measure summed potential of a lot of neurons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ERP is based off what kind of reading?

A

EEG (signal averaged over many events)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Read up on contralateral delay activity (CDA)

A

slides 18-23

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Read up on N2pc

A

slide 24-26, 35

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a component of active suppression?

A

distractor positivity (Pd) component

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does the Pd work?

A

working memory contents protected by actively suppressing similar but irrelevant environmental stimuli (inhibiting irrelevant memory-matching external stimuli)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cognitive-behavioural paradigms (neurocognitive inhbition)

A

assess effects of ignoring distractors, stopping pre-potent actions, limiting perseveration on prior goal states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Single unit and other brain recordings (neurocogntive inhibition)

A

assess the source and impact of inhibitory signals on neural activity (suppression)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Distractor devaluation

A

ignoring a stimulus negatively affects its emotional tone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Raymond, Fenske, & Tavassoli (2003) found that:

A

stimuli that are ignored become affectively devalued

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

De Vito, Ferrey, Fenske, & Al-Aidroos (2018) found that:

A

-ignoring an item in working memory causes it to be devalued

-individual differences in attention and working-memory waveforms correlated with difference in distractor devaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The Pd component is an index of:

A

active suppression

17
Q

Evaluative labeling

A

emotional connotations of ‘rejecting’ vs ‘accepting’ sufficient to explain distractor devaluation (category-level of artefact of instructions)

18
Q

More active suppression is required when interference from distractors is

A

similar to contents of working memory than other distractors (de-valued more than non-matching distractors)

19
Q

Read up on slide

A

57

20
Q

Inhibitory devaluation

A

inhibitory signals are interpreted by fronto-limbic regions as an avoidance-type process that triggers negative affect (associated with perceptual details of inhibited stimulus)