psyc 251 (w6-12) Flashcards
Moral Judgement theorists
Kohlberg and Piaget
Piaget’s theory of moral development states that
children’s moral reasoning changes from a rigid acceptance of the rules into an appreciation that moral rules are a product of social interaction
cognitive development is linked to moral development
Piaget’s 3 stages of moral development, name them
- Heteronomous
- Transitional
- Autonomous
Are Piaget’s stages continuous or discontinuous
Stages are discontinuous; linear progression through them
Heteronomous morality stage of moral development age and what it entails
- Until about 7 years old
- Children regard rules/duties to others as unchangeable “givens” or “things”
- Justice is whatever authorities say is right
- What determines good/bad actions are the consequences, not the motives/intentions behind it
- belief that rules are unchangeable due to social and cognitive factors
children in the heteronomous morality stage believe rules are unchangeable due to which two factors
- social: parental control is coercive and unilateral leading to unquestioning respect for the rules set by adults
- cognitive: children’s cognitive immaturity causes them to believe that rules are “real” things and not just products of the mind (ex. chair)
Transition period of moral development age and what it entails
- about 7-10 years old
- Interactions with peers lead to develop ability to take other’s perspectives and beliefs of fairness
- Rules can change (by situation, majority opinion) and there are exceptions to the rules
Autonomous morality stage of moral development age and what it entails
- by about 11 years old
- children no longer accept blind obedience to authority as a basis of moral decisions
- understand that rules are products of social agreements and can change
- consider fairness and equality as important when constructing rules where punishments should fit the crimes
- intentions and motives are more important than consequences
- understand concept of justice and that rules and justice are important for society
Strengths and critiques of Piaget’s theory of moral development
Strengths:
- moral development does depend on cognitive maturity
- Considered role of interactions with others
- Based on multiple methods of data collection including interviews and observations
Critiques:
- Understanding of intentions develops earlier (before 2 years old)
- Moral reasoning isn’t always this linear
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development focus/interest
Interested in the sequences through which children’s moral reasoning develops over time
Focused on rationale (the why) behind moral decisions
3 Stages of moral development (with 2 substages) of Kolhberg’s theory of moral development
Preconventional
-Punishment and obedience
-Instrumental and exchange
Conventional
-Good girl, nice boy
-Law and order
Postconventional
-Individual rights
-Universal ethics
Stage 1 of Kohlberg’s theory on moral development
Preconventional level- self-centered with focus on rewards and avoiding punishment
Stage 1: Punishment and obedience orientation- reasoning focused on consequences
Stage 2: Instrumental and exchange orientation- reasoning focused on fair exchange
Stage 2 of Kohlberg’s theory on moral development
Conventional level- centered on social relationships and complience with social duties and laws
Stage 3: “Good girl, nice boy” orientation- reasoning focused on social expectations
Stage 4: Law and order orientation- reasoning focused on fulfilling duties and upholding laws
Stage 3 of Kohlberg’s theory on moral development
Postconventional level- centered on ideals and moral principles
Stage 5: Individual rights orientation- reasoning focused on best interest of group
Stage 6: Universal ethical orientation- reasoning focused on upholding moral principles (ex. right to life)
Strengths and critiques of Kohlberg’s theory on moral development
Strengths:
-Link between cognitive ability/perspective taking skills and higher-level moral reasoning
-Moderate correlation between moral reasoning and moral behaviour (external validity)
Critiques:
-Stages are neither discontinuous nor linear; variation in responses depending on situation, social norms etc.
-Ignores cultural differences where there’s emphasis on different values
-Gender differences?
“if you steal, you will go to jail”
Preconventional, stage 1
“he should steal the drug so his wife can cook for him”
Preconventional, stage 2
“If you get caught, you will shame your family”
Conventional, stage 3
“it’s against the law to steal”
Conventional, stage 4
“he should steal because everyone has the right to life”
Postconventional, stages 5/6
Social domain theory of moral development states that
growth in moral reasoning occurs through gradual change based on child’s social interactions and through direct socialization
parents are key to this process as they transmit values both directly and indirectly
3 different domains of social knowledge in the social domain theory
- Moral domain
- Societal domain
- Personal domain
moral domain
an area of social knowledge based on concepts of right and wrong, fairness, justice, and individual rights; these concepts apply across contexts and supersede rules or authority
ex. knowing it is not acceptable to steal another child’s toy
societal domain
an area of social knowledge that encompasses concepts regarding the rules and conventions through which societies maintain order
ex. manners, forms of greeting, clothing choices
personal domain
an area of social knowledge that pertains to actions in which individual preferences are the main consideration; there are no right or wrong choices
ex. how to spend their money, their appearance, friend choices
Conscience
an internal regulatory mechanism that increases an individual’s ability to conform to standards of conduct accepted in their culture
Eisenberg’s theory of prosocial moral development, 5 stages of moral orientations
Level 1- hedonistic self-focused
Level 2- Needs-based orientation
Level 3- Approval/stereotypes
Level 4- self-reflective empathetic
Level 4b- transitional
Level 5- strongly internalized
Having a sense of internal right and wrong
Conscience
Development of conscience influenced by adults, who and how?
Parents: socialization and awareness of others’ thoughts and feelings (“how do you think he felt when you didn’t share your toy”), and secure attachment
Teachers: Inductive discipline (offering explanations for why a behaviour is right or wrong, clarifying how child should behave, setting expectations for behaviour)
Inductive discipline
offering explanations for why a behaviour is right or wrong, clarifying how child should behave, setting expectations for behaviour
Prosocial behaviour
voluntary behaviour intended to benefit another, such as helping, sharing with, and comforting others
What factors predict prosocial behaviours
Genetics
Temperament
Empathy and sympathy
TOM
Culture
Parenting practices
-modelling and teaching
-explicit instruction
-arranging opportunities
-disciplinary style
Peer influences
Primary prevention
a program targeting all individuals in a particular setting (ex. school) in order to prevent the occurrence of a problematic behaviour or condition
secondary prevention
a program designed to help individuals at risk for developing a problem or condition, with the goal of preventing the problem or condition
antisocial behaviour
disruptive, hostile, or aggressive behaviour that violates social norms or rules and that harms or takes advantage of others
aggression
behaviour aimed physically or emotionally harming or injuring others
tertiary intervention
a program designed to help individuals who already exhibit a problem or condition
instrumental aggression
aggression motivated by the desire to obtain a concrete goal
ex. conflict over possessions
relational aggression
intended to harm others by damaging their peer relationships
ex. spreading rumours
aggression- differentiated by purpose
Reactive and Proactive
Reactive aggression
emotionally driven, antagonistic aggression sparked by one’s perception that other people’s motives are hostile
hostile, emotional response to provocation (ex. sibling takes toy, child acts out)
Proactive aggression
unemotional aggression aimed at fulfilling a need/desire
aggression used to obtain something
common in young childre
aggression- differentiated by form
Verbal
Relational
Physical
when does violent crime peak
age 17
delinquent behaviours are predicted by?
earlier aggression
oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)
a disorder characterized by age-inappropriate and persistent displays of angry, defiant, and irritable behaviours
conduct disorder (CD)
a disorder that involves severe antisocial and aggressive behaviours that inflict pain on others or involve the destruction of property or denial of the rights of others
positive youth development
an approach to youth intervention that focuses on developing and nurturing strengths and assets rather than on correcting weaknesses and deficits
service learning
a strategy for promoting positive youth development that integrates school-based instruction with community involvement in order to promote civic responsibility and enhance learning
delinquent behaviours
non-agressive antisocial behaviours
ex. rule breaking, vandalism, crime
lying
- part of typical development
associated with cognitive maturity, TOM, self-control
Sociometrics
process through which researchers quantify social relationships
Sociometric status
measurement of degree to which children are liked/disliked by peers
nominations by classmates
5 status groups in sociometrics
popular- many positive noms, few negative noms
average- average number of positive and negative noms
rejected- many negative noms, few positive noms
neglected- few noms at all, less involved
controversial- many negative noms, many positive noms
Which status group in sociometrics has worse outcome and info about them
rejected children have most negative peer interactions and worse outcomes
poorer academic achievement, internalizing and externalizing behaviours, victimization
40-50% are ‘rejected aggressive
-worse outcomes as they want to engage socially but lack the skills
10-25% are ‘rejected-withdrawn-
Stability in sociometrics
average children tend to remain average
variability in other categories over time, especially during transition periods (ex. changing schools)
Sex
distinction between genetic females (XX) and genetic males (XY) as well as other sex compositions
Gender
social assignment or self-categorization as a girl or boy or both, neither, or other
Cisgender
individuals who identify with their gender assigned at birth
Transgender
individuals who do not identify with the gender assigned at birth
nonbinary
individuals who do not identify exclusively with one gender
gender-fluid
individuals who identify with different gender categories depending on the context
bigender
individuals who identify with two genders
agender
individuals who do not identify with any gender category
gender typing
the process of gender socialization
gender-typed
behaviours stereotyped or expected for a given person’s assigned gender
ex. girls like playing with dolls
cross-gender-typed
behaviours stereotyped or expected for the gender other than that of a given person
ex. boys not expected to play with dolls