psyc 251 (w6-12) Flashcards
Moral Judgement theorists
Kohlberg and Piaget
Piaget’s theory of moral development states that
children’s moral reasoning changes from a rigid acceptance of the rules into an appreciation that moral rules are a product of social interaction
cognitive development is linked to moral development
Piaget’s 3 stages of moral development, name them
- Heteronomous
- Transitional
- Autonomous
Are Piaget’s stages continuous or discontinuous
Stages are discontinuous; linear progression through them
Heteronomous morality stage of moral development age and what it entails
- Until about 7 years old
- Children regard rules/duties to others as unchangeable “givens” or “things”
- Justice is whatever authorities say is right
- What determines good/bad actions are the consequences, not the motives/intentions behind it
- belief that rules are unchangeable due to social and cognitive factors
children in the heteronomous morality stage believe rules are unchangeable due to which two factors
- social: parental control is coercive and unilateral leading to unquestioning respect for the rules set by adults
- cognitive: children’s cognitive immaturity causes them to believe that rules are “real” things and not just products of the mind (ex. chair)
Transition period of moral development age and what it entails
- about 7-10 years old
- Interactions with peers lead to develop ability to take other’s perspectives and beliefs of fairness
- Rules can change (by situation, majority opinion) and there are exceptions to the rules
Autonomous morality stage of moral development age and what it entails
- by about 11 years old
- children no longer accept blind obedience to authority as a basis of moral decisions
- understand that rules are products of social agreements and can change
- consider fairness and equality as important when constructing rules where punishments should fit the crimes
- intentions and motives are more important than consequences
- understand concept of justice and that rules and justice are important for society
Strengths and critiques of Piaget’s theory of moral development
Strengths:
- moral development does depend on cognitive maturity
- Considered role of interactions with others
- Based on multiple methods of data collection including interviews and observations
Critiques:
- Understanding of intentions develops earlier (before 2 years old)
- Moral reasoning isn’t always this linear
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development focus/interest
Interested in the sequences through which children’s moral reasoning develops over time
Focused on rationale (the why) behind moral decisions
3 Stages of moral development (with 2 substages) of Kolhberg’s theory of moral development
Preconventional
-Punishment and obedience
-Instrumental and exchange
Conventional
-Good girl, nice boy
-Law and order
Postconventional
-Individual rights
-Universal ethics
Stage 1 of Kohlberg’s theory on moral development
Preconventional level- self-centered with focus on rewards and avoiding punishment
Stage 1: Punishment and obedience orientation- reasoning focused on consequences
Stage 2: Instrumental and exchange orientation- reasoning focused on fair exchange
Stage 2 of Kohlberg’s theory on moral development
Conventional level- centered on social relationships and complience with social duties and laws
Stage 3: “Good girl, nice boy” orientation- reasoning focused on social expectations
Stage 4: Law and order orientation- reasoning focused on fulfilling duties and upholding laws
Stage 3 of Kohlberg’s theory on moral development
Postconventional level- centered on ideals and moral principles
Stage 5: Individual rights orientation- reasoning focused on best interest of group
Stage 6: Universal ethical orientation- reasoning focused on upholding moral principles (ex. right to life)
Strengths and critiques of Kohlberg’s theory on moral development
Strengths:
-Link between cognitive ability/perspective taking skills and higher-level moral reasoning
-Moderate correlation between moral reasoning and moral behaviour (external validity)
Critiques:
-Stages are neither discontinuous nor linear; variation in responses depending on situation, social norms etc.
-Ignores cultural differences where there’s emphasis on different values
-Gender differences?
“if you steal, you will go to jail”
Preconventional, stage 1
“he should steal the drug so his wife can cook for him”
Preconventional, stage 2
“If you get caught, you will shame your family”
Conventional, stage 3
“it’s against the law to steal”
Conventional, stage 4
“he should steal because everyone has the right to life”
Postconventional, stages 5/6
Social domain theory of moral development states that
growth in moral reasoning occurs through gradual change based on child’s social interactions and through direct socialization
parents are key to this process as they transmit values both directly and indirectly
3 different domains of social knowledge in the social domain theory
- Moral domain
- Societal domain
- Personal domain
moral domain
an area of social knowledge based on concepts of right and wrong, fairness, justice, and individual rights; these concepts apply across contexts and supersede rules or authority
ex. knowing it is not acceptable to steal another child’s toy
societal domain
an area of social knowledge that encompasses concepts regarding the rules and conventions through which societies maintain order
ex. manners, forms of greeting, clothing choices