PSY2002 W1 Language I Flashcards

An introduction to computational models of speech production

1
Q

Language Definition

A

an exchange of information: language processing occurs under the level of conscious awareness. You are not aware of all information being processed to allow you to speak.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Methods to test speech prodcution

A

Timing of speech onset, hesitations and pauses
Tip-of-the-tongue state
Speech errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why do we hesitated

A

Word representations in the lexicon compete for selection due to spreading activation.
Competition between words slow down the speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tip-of-the-tongue state

A

Unable to retrieve the word you want

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tip of the tongue - grammatical gender (Vigliocco et al. 1997)

A

In language with grammatical gender, you are able to state the grammatical gender of the word but cannot access the phonological form of the word
Can retrieve the syntactic elements that go with the word. Cannot retrieve the sounds to expression the word.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does the tip of the tongue state suggest

A

Sentence is planned, structured is planned, syntax in place but strugglin gto retrieve the sound, suggest specific levels of procssing required to produce speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Speech errors - specific processes

A

Speech errors tend to occur within specific processes, such as the selection of syntatic units or form (syllables and phonemes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Specific levels of processing language

A

Semantic processing (think about the concept) => Syntactic adn morphemic processing => Articulation (form processing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types of speech errors

A

Omission, Addition, Lexical substitution, Morpheme substitution, phonological substitution, lexical exchange, phonological exchange, anticipations, perseverations, blends, morpheme shift, morpheme standings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Speech errors - language processes

A

Errors tend to occur within the following process rather than corssing th eboundaries between them.

  • Semantic processing
  • Syntactic and morphemic processing
  • Articulation (form processing)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Semantic processing - Speech errors

A

Semantic processing = conceptualisation semantic blend errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Syntactic and morphemic processing - speech errors

A

formulation syntactic and morpheme exchange

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Articulation (form processing) - speech errors

A

articulation word and phoneme exchange.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Model of utterance generation (1971): Victoria Fromkin

A

First models of speech prodcution. Serial processing (discrete).
1. Meaning
2. Syntactic structure [article + // + plural + possessive + article //]
3. Position of intonation
4. Lexicon look-up (finds words and generate phonological segments)
5.Morphophonemic constraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Discrete Models

A

Each stage must be completed before the next begins.

Activation is feed forwards can only move from meaning to sound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.

A

Assumes processes are fluid, information can go back and forth through the language production processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production.

A

Assumes processes are serially organised and must complete 1 before the other begins – similar to Fromkin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Types of models (cognitive psychology)

A

Box and arrow model
Computational model

19
Q

Box and arrow model

A

Fromkin’s model

Describe the relationship between different mentla prossess under the assumption that the mind opperates like multi stage information processing machines.
We can study this models by manipulating the input and observing the output.

20
Q

Computational model

A

Implemented as functiong computational models = (Dell, G. S. (1986) and Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999))

21
Q

Statistical models

A

a mathematical relationship between variables, that hold under specific assumptions

22
Q

Theoretical models

A

description of the relationship between different mental processes, that makes assumptions about the nature of these processes.

23
Q

Behaviourism

A

Input => Brain => Output (behaviour)

24
Q

Neural Networks

A

Nodes represent groups of neurons. Activation of nodes spreads activation across the network.

25
Q

Dell (1986) Spreading activation theory

A

The theory is a cascaded interactive model. Information is active in parallel.
Spreading activation in both semantic level adn phonemic level.
All diffirent stages happen at once, we may also activated other semantically related concepts and could account to word errors.

26
Q

The thoery and prediction - Dell 1986

A

Spreadin gactivation results in activation of related items at all levels of processing. Processing items that verlap in semantics adn or phonology will result in higher errors rates than processing items that do not overlap

27
Q

Experiement Ferreira and Griffin 2003

A

Participants named target pictures (picture of a priest) after first reading sentences that primed a semantic competitor (‘nun’), a semantic and phonological competitor (‘none’) or an unrelated word (‘match’).
In an interactive model the combined influence of Semantic and Phonological similarity results in an error.
Participants were more likely to mistakenly produce the semantic or phonoligcal and sematic competitor than they were to produce an unrealated word.

28
Q

The Evidence: Ferreira and Griffin (2003)

A

Participants can successfully inhibit ‘match’ to say ‘priest’ but fail to inhibit ‘nun/none’ and say ‘priest’. Semantically and phonologically related items are active at the same time and can be selected for output.

29
Q

Is speech production based on interactive processes?

A

Evidence from Ferreira and Griffin (2003) demonstrates that semantic and phonological similarity can result in speech errors suggesting that processing is fluid and interactive

30
Q

Speech Errors in Dell’s 1986 Model: How does this account for the speech errors observed by Fromkin?

A
  • errors may occur due to more than one concept receiving the same amount of activation. Both concepts become active resultign in a cascade of processing to the level of phonology
31
Q

Dell 1986 Interim Conclusion

A

The model provides a convincing account of speech errors. Evidence from lab induced speech errors supports the suggestion that processing is interactive.
However, some suggest that the parallel processing in the Dell model would predict that we make far more speech errors than we actually do.

32
Q

Levelt et al., 1999 WEAVER++ = Word-form Encoding by Activation and VERification

A

Similar model to Dell but Discrete.
Activation can only go in one direction, process must be complet before another can begin, prevents errors in speech all the time.

33
Q

LEMMA

A

The word form and the syntactic information that links with the word form

34
Q

Competitive processes

A

Selection of items at each level is based on competition between items. Once word has been selected, this node sends inhibitory signal to other related concepts to stop activation.

WEAVER++ (levelt et al.) predicts that items which are semantically similar will inhibit processing.

35
Q

Dell 1986 - Inhibition

A

No inhibition in dell’s model, due to the lack of inhibitory connections processing items which are semantically similar will not be inhibitive

36
Q

The Experiment: Wheeldon & Monsell 1994

A

Participants were asked to answer a question out loud and then name a picture ( What is the largest creature that swims in the seam - whale - picture of a shark)
Once you activate the concept of whale you inhibit related concepts like shark so you will be slower in naming the image aka shark

37
Q

The Experiment: Wheeldon & Monsell 1994
Results:

A

Mean reaction times for semantically related adn unrelated items. It takes longer to record the word of an image semantically related to the answer to the question

38
Q

Is speech prodcution based on interactive processes

A

Evidence that semantically related items inhibit processing of each other suggest that speech production processes are discrete.

39
Q

Speech errors in Levelt et al.’s WEAVER ++ Model

A

Errors may occur if the wrong concept is selected and processed to the phonological level. Two concepts that are both viable options for the utterance could be selected and processed to the phonological level

40
Q

WEAVER ++ Interim conclusion

A

Levelt et al.’s model has to suggest that speech errors are ‘special cases’, but WEAVER++ accounts for inhibitory effects in speech production where Dell’s model appears ill equipped to accommodate these effects

41
Q

Interactive processing

A

If processing of spoken words is interactive and parallel (Dell, 1986) phonological processing is likely to occur for all items that are related by semantics and/or phonology to the target item.

42
Q

Discrete processing

A

If processing of spoken words is discrete and feedforwards (Levelt et al., 1999) phonological processing should only occur for items that have been selected and should not be affected by ‘non target’ information.

43
Q

Semantic interference Meyer & Damian (2007)

A

When phonological items overlap (related items) are faster, because the DO of doll and dog will activate the concepts quick.

Phonological should not have an effect on our speech production then there must be some interaction even if they don’t match the studies