PSY1001 WEEK 10 Flashcards

1
Q

outline social penetration theory

A

development, superficial to intimate and dissolution, via SD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define social penetration

A

process by which one peels back layers of personal info (from superficial to intimate, personal, core)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is norm of reciprocity (SD)

A

SD at specific level, matched by partner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define depenetration

A

emotional withdrawal from relationship through reduction in quantity and intimacy of info SD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

name 4 stages of social penetration

A

orientation, exploratory affective exchange, affective exchange, stable exchange

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

outline the orientation stage of social penetration

A

superficial info, cautious, careful, share public self, avoid conflict, socially desirable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explain the exploratory affective exchange stage of social penetration

A

less cautious, still public self, greater breadth of topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain the affective exchange stage of social penetration

A

some intimate info, level of comfort, initiation of conflict, sarcasm, nicknames

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain the stable exchange stage of social penetration

A

openness, breadth, depth, honesty, high spontaneity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

link social penetration theory to social exchange theory

A

economic framework of reward/cost/transfer. greater reward-cost ratio means more rapid penetration so quicker escalation and more positive SD experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

state limitations of social penetration theory

A

individual difference (introvert, culture)
not linear ( if comfortable, SD more)
ignores other factor apart from SD
limited in scope (co-worker)
doesn’t describe established relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain link of social media and social penetration

A

more visible, accessible SD but superficial (imposition on time/resource however allow better behavioural prediction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define evolutionary account of gender relationships

A

arise from differences between men and women in benefits obtained by friendships with those with particular traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

define cultural accounts for gender relationships

A

social role theory - gender role produced, reinforced via social interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

outline men’s same gender friendships

A

greater value for agentic characterstic (means to an end- athletic, rich)
higher risk of low-quality (low expectation, less close relationships)
increased homophobia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

outline womens same gender friendships

A

communion and SD (more intimacy, effort, expectation)
more likely of disappointment
increased risks of co-rumination (discuss problems, constantly dwell, association of depression and anxiety)

17
Q

state the commonalities in same gender friendships

A

symmetrical reciprocity (similar level of loyalty, mutual regard, trust, reciprocal exchanged)
inclusion, mutual activity
geographic proximity
similarities

18
Q

evaluate same-gender friendship

A

evidence support (meta-analyses)
culturally specific (homophobia, corumination, male vulnerabiltiy)
no account of non-binary

19
Q

explain John Lee colours of love

A

combining primary colours (love types) create secondary colours (love types)

20
Q

what is Sternberg triangular theory of love

A

combining 3 main factors produces 7 types of love
passion
intimacy
committment

21
Q

outline 3 factor theory of passionate love

A

meeting suitable potential partner
attributing physical arousal to partner
understanding and accepting love

22
Q

define companionate love

A

based on friendly affection and deep attachment due to extensive familiarities, replacing passion, enduring

23
Q

outline social exchange theory (relationship satisfaction)

A

balance between giving and receiving, take part in relationships with reward outweighing cost, compare to alternative

24
Q

outline equity theory (relationship satisfaction)

A

equality leads to higher satisfaction, perception of advantage, those perceiving underbenefitting experience higher level of anger, frustration. over benefitting feel guilt, equal level feel happiness and satisfaction

25
Q

outline how interpretation of attribution can contribute to relationship satisfaction

A

a happy relationship blame problem on self and give partner credit for solutions. unhappy blame partner, see their problematic behaviour as affecting other parts of relationship

26
Q

outline research into the impact of social comparison on relationship satisfaction

A

cross-sectional survey found those with high rel sat perceived own relationships better than other

27
Q

outline the role of social networks in relationship satisfaction

A

sharing social networks increase marital satisfactions

28
Q

how can secure attachments influence relationship satisfaction

A

lasting relationships, experience companionate love, preferred as partners

29
Q

how can anxious attachments influence relationship satisfaction

A

perceived higher relationship conflict, less optomism for future

30
Q

explain Rusbult investment model

A

commitment to relationship predicted by high sat in current relationship, investments size, alternative quality
mimic those we unconsciously think attractive

31
Q

with Rusbults investment model, how do those in happy and committed relationships behave

A

engage in rel protecting behaviours such as devaluing attractive individuals and less goal directed mimicry

32
Q

name 4 stages of Ducks model of relationship breakdown

A

intrapsychic, dyadic, social, grave dressing

33
Q

outline intrapsychic phase of Ducks relationships dissolution model

A

partner thinks in detail about relationship problem source, conduct internal cost-benefit analysis

34
Q

outline dyadic phase of Ducks relationships dissolution model

A

decision made about something needs to be done, negotiate, reconciliate, argue

35
Q

explain the social phase of Ducks relationships dissolution model

A

when accepted relationship is ending, both partners turn to friends for support

36
Q

explain the grave dressing phase of Ducks relationships dissolution model

A

division of property, access to children

37
Q

how may someone with avoidant attachment style move on from relationships breakdown

A

increased anger, sad

38
Q

for those who’s partner initiated breakup, how do they move on

A

increased depression, anxiety, distress, takes longer

39
Q
A