PSY1001 WEEK 10 Flashcards

1
Q

outline social penetration theory

A

development, superficial to intimate and dissolution, via SD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define social penetration

A

process by which one peels back layers of personal info (from superficial to intimate, personal, core)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is norm of reciprocity (SD)

A

SD at specific level, matched by partner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define depenetration

A

emotional withdrawal from relationship through reduction in quantity and intimacy of info SD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

name 4 stages of social penetration

A

orientation, exploratory affective exchange, affective exchange, stable exchange

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

outline the orientation stage of social penetration

A

superficial info, cautious, careful, share public self, avoid conflict, socially desirable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explain the exploratory affective exchange stage of social penetration

A

less cautious, still public self, greater breadth of topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain the affective exchange stage of social penetration

A

some intimate info, level of comfort, initiation of conflict, sarcasm, nicknames

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain the stable exchange stage of social penetration

A

openness, breadth, depth, honesty, high spontaneity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

link social penetration theory to social exchange theory

A

economic framework of reward/cost/transfer. greater reward-cost ratio means more rapid penetration so quicker escalation and more positive SD experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

state limitations of social penetration theory

A

individual difference (introvert, culture)
not linear ( if comfortable, SD more)
ignores other factor apart from SD
limited in scope (co-worker)
doesn’t describe established relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain link of social media and social penetration

A

more visible, accessible SD but superficial (imposition on time/resource however allow better behavioural prediction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define evolutionary account of gender relationships

A

arise from differences between men and women in benefits obtained by friendships with those with particular traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

define cultural accounts for gender relationships

A

social role theory - gender role produced, reinforced via social interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

outline men’s same gender friendships

A

greater value for agentic characterstic (means to an end- athletic, rich)
higher risk of low-quality (low expectation, less close relationships)
increased homophobia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

outline womens same gender friendships

A

communion and SD (more intimacy, effort, expectation)
more likely of disappointment
increased risks of co-rumination (discuss problems, constantly dwell, association of depression and anxiety)

17
Q

state the commonalities in same gender friendships

A

symmetrical reciprocity (similar level of loyalty, mutual regard, trust, reciprocal exchanged)
inclusion, mutual activity
geographic proximity
similarities

18
Q

evaluate same-gender friendship

A

evidence support (meta-analyses)
culturally specific (homophobia, corumination, male vulnerabiltiy)
no account of non-binary

19
Q

explain John Lee colours of love

A

combining primary colours (love types) create secondary colours (love types)

20
Q

what is Sternberg triangular theory of love

A

combining 3 main factors produces 7 types of love
passion
intimacy
committment

21
Q

outline 3 factor theory of passionate love

A

meeting suitable potential partner
attributing physical arousal to partner
understanding and accepting love

22
Q

define companionate love

A

based on friendly affection and deep attachment due to extensive familiarities, replacing passion, enduring

23
Q

outline social exchange theory (relationship satisfaction)

A

balance between giving and receiving, take part in relationships with reward outweighing cost, compare to alternative

24
Q

outline equity theory (relationship satisfaction)

A

equality leads to higher satisfaction, perception of advantage, those perceiving underbenefitting experience higher level of anger, frustration. over benefitting feel guilt, equal level feel happiness and satisfaction

25
outline how interpretation of attribution can contribute to relationship satisfaction
a happy relationship blame problem on self and give partner credit for solutions. unhappy blame partner, see their problematic behaviour as affecting other parts of relationship
26
outline research into the impact of social comparison on relationship satisfaction
cross-sectional survey found those with high rel sat perceived own relationships better than other
27
outline the role of social networks in relationship satisfaction
sharing social networks increase marital satisfactions
28
how can secure attachments influence relationship satisfaction
lasting relationships, experience companionate love, preferred as partners
29
how can anxious attachments influence relationship satisfaction
perceived higher relationship conflict, less optomism for future
30
explain Rusbult investment model
commitment to relationship predicted by high sat in current relationship, investments size, alternative quality mimic those we unconsciously think attractive
31
with Rusbults investment model, how do those in happy and committed relationships behave
engage in rel protecting behaviours such as devaluing attractive individuals and less goal directed mimicry
32
name 4 stages of Ducks model of relationship breakdown
intrapsychic, dyadic, social, grave dressing
33
outline intrapsychic phase of Ducks relationships dissolution model
partner thinks in detail about relationship problem source, conduct internal cost-benefit analysis
34
outline dyadic phase of Ducks relationships dissolution model
decision made about something needs to be done, negotiate, reconciliate, argue
35
explain the social phase of Ducks relationships dissolution model
when accepted relationship is ending, both partners turn to friends for support
36
explain the grave dressing phase of Ducks relationships dissolution model
division of property, access to children
37
how may someone with avoidant attachment style move on from relationships breakdown
increased anger, sad
38
for those who's partner initiated breakup, how do they move on
increased depression, anxiety, distress, takes longer
39