Provocation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

R v Duffy

A

Classic Definition Provocation is some acts done by dead man that would cause any reasonable person, and actually causes accused’s loss of self control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

DPP v MacEoin

A

Provocation creates intention to kill or cause serious injury. Example of very subjective look.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Bedder

A

Objective test is profoundly illogical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

English Approach

A

Subjective/Objective test. Homicide Act 1957 Section 3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DPP v Davis

A

MacEoin was extremely subjective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DPP v Curran

A

A wholly subjective approach could ruin the point of the defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DPP v Kieran Lynch

A

Provocation is a notoriously difficult topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

DPP v McNamara

A

Any individual must exercise ordinary restraint such that an ordinary person of same stats and general intelligence. Must not be planned or considered. Must be in the face of something said or done. Judged as if they were sober. Not merely an insult. Must be outside bounds of any ordinary interaction. DOesnt apply to romance, male pride, or gang vengeance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mixed subjective/ objective test

A

MR for murder? Suddenly lose self control? Do the actions qualify as sufficient provocation? Would ordinary person act that way?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Richens

A

Killed V who raped girlfriend. D must not be able to restrain themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Cocker

A

Smothered wife who was terminally ill. Must not have reasonable amount of awareness?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DPP v Doyle

A

Mistaken identity is possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Acott

A

Need evidence of provocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Doughty

A

Smothered infant son. Claimed loss of control due to tiredness. Sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Duffy

A

Cant induce desire for revenge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

DPP v Kelly

A

Must be total and come suddenly before passion has time to cool.

17
Q

DPP v Curran

A

Just being in a rage or being vexed doesnt meet the requirement

18
Q

R v Ahluwalia

A

Domestic abuse case. Insufficient. But diminished responsibility.

19
Q

DPP v McNamara

A

Time lag should be on case by case basis.

20
Q

R v Edwards

A

Self induced provocation. Blackmailer cant rely on blackmail, but if person is excessive