Property Offenses Flashcards
What are the property offenses (9)?
- Larceny
- Embezzlement
- False Pretenses
- Robbery
- Extortion
- Receipt of Stolen Property
- Theft
- Forgery
- Malicious Mischief
What are the elements of “larceny” (4) ?
- a TAKING (obtaining control) and CARRYING AWAY (asportation)
- of TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF another with POSSESSION
- by TRESPASS (without consent or by consent induced by fraud)
- with INTENT TO PERMANENTLY DEPRIVE that person of her interest in the property
With regards to “larceny” what is the rule re possession?
The property stolen must be taken from the custody or possession of another.
If D had possession of property at the time of the taking, the crime is NOT larceny, but may be embezzlement
With regards to “larceny” what is the issue re: “possession” versus “custody”?
- “possession” involves greater scope of authority than custody. Person has discretionary authority of property
NOTE –> low level employees normally only have custody of an item. So they can be guilty of larceny for taking item.
With regards to “larceny” what is the special rule re: bailee and breaking bulk?
Normally –> bailee has possession and may be guilty of embezzlement (not larceny)
HOWEVER –> if she opens closed containers in which property has been placed, she is breaking bulk, and she may be guilty of larceny bc possession is regarded to go back to bailor
What is the rule with regards to “larceny” and “intent to permanently deprive”?
In General –> larceny requires that AT THE TIME OF THE TAKING, D INTENDED to permanently deprive that person of the property
Sufficient intent –> intent to create substantial risk of loss, or intent to sell or pledge the goods
Insufficient Intent –> D:
- believes property is hers; OR
- she intends only to borrow the property; OR
- to keep it as repayment of a debt
MBE tip –> make sure D had intent to permanently desire WHEN she took the property. If NOT, there is no larceny (unless it’s a continuing trespass situation)
What is the rule re: larceny and mislaid property?
Larceny CAN be committed with –> lost or mislaid property, or property that has been delivered by mistake
BUT NOT –> with ABANDONED property
What is the rule re: larceny and “continuing trespass” situation?
If D WRONGFULLY takes property WITHOUT intent to permanently deprive (ie… without permission borrows umbrella) and LATER decides to keep the property, she is guilty of larceny WHEN she decides to keep it.
HOWEVER –> if the original taking was NOT WRONGFUL, and she later decides to keep it, it is NOT LARCENY.
EXAMPLE –> she took the umbrella thinking it was hers, then decides to keep it.
What are the elements of “embezzlement” (3)?
- conversion (dealing w property in manner inconsistent w arrangement) of personal property of another
- by a person in LAWFUL POSSESSION of that property
- with INTENT to defraud
How do you distinguish “larceny” from “embezzlement”?
Larceny –> D misappropriates item while it is not in his possession
Embezzlement –> D misappropriates item while it IS in his lawful possession
What is the rule with regards to “embezzlement” and “fraudulent intent”?
D must have INTENT to DEFRAUD
With regards to “embezzlement” and “fraudulent intent” - what is the rule if D has the intent to restore the property?
- If D has intent to restore EXACT property taken –> not embezzelement
If D has intent to restore SIMILAR or SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR property –> it IS embezzlement
-NOTE –> this includes money of identical value
With regards to “embezzlement” and “fraudulent intent” - what is the rule if D has a claim of right?
There is NO embezzlement if D took property under a claim of right
What are the elements of “false pretenses” (3) ?
- obtaining TITLE to PERSONAL PROPERTY of another
- by an INTENTIONAL false statement of PAST or EXISTING fact
- with INTENT to DEFRAUD
NOTE:
- the victim must ACTUALLY be deceived or act in reliance on the misrepresentation; AND
- it must be a MAJOR FACTOR in them giving up title
What is the difference between “false pretenses” and “larceny by trick”?
“larceny by trick” –> victim is tricked by misrepresentation of fact into giving up mere CUSTODY of the item
“false pretenses” –> victim is tricked into giving up TITLE of the item