Property Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Property

Types of property (2)

A

A relationship between people wrt things
Real = Land or anything permanently attached to land, is fixed and not moveable
Personal = anything that isn’t real property, can be tangible or intangible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of possessory interests in land (3)

A

Fee simple = greatest private interest person can have in real property, ownership
Life estate = rarely used, person can live on the land for their lifetime only and after death the land is transferred to another person, used in estate planning
Leasehold estate = Interests in real property limited to specific time period, after which possession of land reverts back to owner, can be residential or commercial, created by lease agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Non possessory interests in land (5)

A

Easement = gives person right to use portion of another’s land for specific purpose
- ex Canada post entering property to deliver mail
Right of war = allows person to cross another’s land to get somewhere
- ex shared driveway
License = allows person to use another’s land for profit
- ex gold course on municipally owned land
Restrictive covenant = promise that prevents party from specific action on the land
Mortgage = gives holder right to take possession of real property if debtor defaults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Joint tenancy

Tenants in common

A

Join tenancy = 2 or more people own equal shares in 1 parcel of real property, when one dies the other inherits their interest
Tenants in common = don’t have equal share and there is no right of survivorship, dead tenant’s interests go to their heirs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mediums for transfer/registration of land interests (4)

A

Provincial land registry system (outdated)
Contractual agreements for purchase and sale of property
Electronic land titles system
Title insurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Condominium

A

Combination of fee simple (apartment unit) and co ownership (common area such as lobby)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cooperative housing

A

Not for profit
Members don’t own their units, pay for property maintenance
Members vote on how co-op is run
Cost is usually much lower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What things are limited in residential tenancies (6)

A
Deposits
Rent increases
Discrimination
Dispute resolution
Termination and eviction
Landlord's right of distress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Basic terms that a commercial lease will cover (7)

A
Basic rent and additional rent
Gross vs net leases
Permitted use of premises
Rights of renewal
Assignment and sublease
Term and termination
Remedies for breach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lockmac Holdings Ltd v Earle

A

About: land interests, personal covenants
Plaintiff claimed that a restrictive covenant didn’t run with the land (dies with original vendor) (contract law)
Court agreed that personal covenants are enforceable only by/against original parties to the deed, not tied to the building scheme
Covenants that run with the land can be enforced by/against subsequent owners (property law)
If parties intended for the restrictions to run with the land, the land must be clearly defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Woolworth v Hudson’s Bay

A

About: restrictive covenants
Restrictive covenants will run with the land when the covenant is expressly stated to run, or when the land is part of a common building scheme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Peters v Peters

A

About: land interests
Court held that 2/3 brothers’ application for sale of property jointly owned with 3rd brother wasn’t for vexing/oppressive reasons, but because of their inability to operate as joint owners
Court ordered sale of property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Semelhago v Paramadevan

A

About: land interests and specific performance
Awarded plaintiff damages for breach of contract relating to house sale
Rejected traditional view that specific performance is a is a remedy for breach of contract wrt land because every piece of land is unique, since in modern real estate properties are often mass produced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rules about personal property (2)

A

If personal property is permanently affixed to real property, they become real property
Finders keepers: finders have good title against everyone except the true owner, unless the goods are lost on private property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bailment

A

When one person (bailee) has possession of goods that belong to someone else (bailor)
If something happens to the goods during bailment, the bailee is usually responsible
- standard of care expected will be influenced by value/nature of goods, whether bailment benefitted bailee or bailor, and terms of contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Thomas v Canada

A

About: personal property, finders keepers
Plaintiff found $18k accidentally put in his PO box, turned it over to the postal office but was denied recovery of money after no true owner was found
Court rules that plaintiff came into possession of money as soon as he opened it and didn’t give up possession when he turned it over to postal office because that wasn’t his intent, and ex turpa causa doesn’t apply because there was no intention of criminality
Plaintiff was entitled to money

17
Q

Trachuk v Olinek

A

About: finders keepers for personal property
Construction workers found money buried in ground and true owner was never found, owner of land where money was buried didn’t have right to money because possession of land didn’t translate to possession of money

18
Q

Bird v Ford Frances

A

About: finders keepers for personal property
Young boy found money on private property and turned it over to police, boy sued municipality for the money after they deposited it in a trust for the true owner after no owner was found

19
Q

Costello v Chief Constable of Derbyshire

A

About: ex turpa causa
Thief’s prior possession of the stolen car seized by police doesn’t allow him to recover possession if the good is lawfully divested from him and invested in another

20
Q

Baird v BC

A

About: ex turpa causa
Plaintiff wanted to recover money that he stole after it was seized by police
Seizure of money was defended on basis of ex turpa causa (no cause of action may be founded on an illegal/immoral act)

21
Q

Weitzner v Herman

A

About: personal property
Defendant who found money hidden in house they just bought claimed title to the money because of salvage rights, but judge ruled that since neither party had knowledge of the money, it was impossible for it to have been included as part of the ‘as is’ sale of the house
Plaintiff (wife of deceased husband who hid money originally) entitled to money

22
Q

Longley v Mitchell Fur co

A

About: bailment
Plaintiff sued fur storage company after their coat was stolen while in their custody, court ruled that since company wasn’t an insurer and demonstrated that they took reasonable care there was no case

23
Q

Samuel Smith & Sons v Silverman

A

About: bailment
Plaintiff sued parking lot for damage that occurred to their car on the premises, defendant admitted to negligence in their care of car but they had disclaimer for theft/damage on parking receipt
Court dismissed plaintiff’s case because of disclaimer

24
Q

Intellectual property

A

Protects creations of the mind but not the ideas themselves (protects applications of those ideas)

25
Q

Trademarks

Registered vs unregistered

A

Are words/logos/symbols that distinguish G/S
Applies to specific G/S, don’t exist in abstract (exception is ‘famous marks’)
Colour cannot be trademarked, sound can be trademarked
Registered (renewable) = provides rights of use across Canada, protection against a challenge based on prior use after 5 years, and 15 years of protection
Unregistered = arises automatically, but only provides local rights

26
Q

Types of trademark infringement (2)

A

Passing off = requires goodwill/reputation in original mark, public misrepresentation by company doing the trademark infringement, and resulting damages
Dilution = using a mark in a non confusing manner that tarnishes/diminishes value of original mark

27
Q

Remedies for trademark infringement (4)

A

Damages
Injunctions (most valuable)
Account of profits (turn over profits from infringement)
Delivering up (turning over merchandise with trademark infringement)

28
Q

Copywrite

A

Protects original creative works from unauthorized copying
Arises automatically if criteria (original, fixed medium, connected to Canada) is satisfied
Valid for author’s life (not owner’s) + 50 years
Usually not registered, can be sold

29
Q

Fair dealing

A

Exception to copyright protection, allows for

  • review
  • criticism
  • news reporting
  • private study
  • parody/satire
30
Q

Moral rights

A

Rights of the creator to be associated with the work and not to have the work disparaged/humiliated
Belongs to creator, can’t be transferred
Can be waived by creator

31
Q

Patent
Criteria (3)
Remedies

A

Protects inventions (products/compositions/processes/improvements on existing inventions), provides exclusive right to practice an invention for 20 years
Only applies to specific use of the invention
Can’t be sold, leased, or used as collateral
Unless stipulated in contract, if employee invents something that invention belongs to them, not their employer
Criteria
- new (can’t have been disclosed to public more than 1 year before patent application)
- serve a useful, specific purpose
- not obvious
Same remedies as trademark infringement (damages, injunction, profits, merchandise)

32
Q

Industrial designs

A

Protects visual appearance of a product against manufacture/sale/rent/importation
Must be registered within 1 year of initial use, lasts for 10 years
Do not extend to functional components or composition, only for design/appearance

33
Q

Trade secrets

A

Don’t count as intellectual property because they are protected through contract and are no property

34
Q

Harvard College v Canada Commissioner of Patents

A

About: patents
Harvard’s patent for oncomice production was refused, SCC allowed Commissioner of Patents to appeal the overturn of their initial refusal
Composition of matter (Patents Act) shouldn’t include genetically modified higher life form, as ‘matter’ is only one aspect of a higher life form
Reasonable to assume that Parliament didn’t intend Patent Act to extend to higher life forms

35
Q

Lego v Mega Bloks

A

About: trademark, industrial design
Registrar rejected Lego’s trademark of its blocks after Mega Bloks began making identical blocks after Lego’s patent for locking system expired, since the distinctive locking system was purely functional
A distinctive mark should not be confused with the product itself
Trademark law isn’t intended to prevent competitive use of utilitarian features of products

36
Q

Armando Pastor v Roger Chen

A

About: trade secrets, intellectual property
Court held that confidentiality agreement between plaintiff and defendant wasn’t unenforceable restraint of trade (only prohibited disclosure of plaintiff’s trade secrets)
Plaintiff’s dance was determined to be copyrightable, not too far in public domain that confidentiality could not be reasonably requested
Awarded plaintiff for damages for defendant’s breach of contract

37
Q

Saltman Engineering v Campbell Engineering

A

About: intellectual property
Requirements of a valid confidentiality agreement are
- confider must demonstrate that info is not in public domain
Info must have bee communicated in a way that imported obligation of confidence
Confider must prove that confidant breached obligation of confidence

38
Q

Mattel Inc v Canada

A

About: intellectual property, trademark
SCC dismissed Mattel’s opposition to a restaurant’s trademark registration of ‘Barbie’ since the industries were so different that it wouldn’t create confusion